Texas Is Attempting to Sue Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin Over the 2020 Election
Embattled Attorney General Ken Paxton is the latest to ask the Supreme Court to intervene in the 2020 Presidential election results.
Embattled Attorney General Ken Paxton is the latest to ask the Supreme Court to intervene in the 2020 Presidential election results.
According to the ruling, the former Trump attorney also filed the wrong claims in the wrong court at the wrong time on behalf of the wrong plaintiffs.
"Don't listen to my friends," the president says, referring to supporters who took his fraud allegations seriously.
States where recreational use has been legalized now include about a third of the U.S. population.
Some of the changes are reasonable. But many of the new questions are badly designed and incorporate serious errors. Moreover, such tests raise the deeper issue of why immigrants are required to pass a test to get the right to vote, but natives are not.
Trump could have reined in his Twitter attacks, surrounded himself with truth-tellers rather than sycophants, and reached out to other voters. He didn't. That's why he lost.
"This is about restoring faith and confidence in American elections," the president says.
Fans of limited government have a lot to be happy about. It's much harder to go big when you are constantly at risk of being told to go home.
Circumstances change and the world may grow more complicated, but authoritarians never vary from their demand for more power over our lives.
The former Trump attorney's election fraud lawsuits feature the same sort of dubious evidence that has failed to impress courts across the country.
Either the AG is acknowledging reality, or he's joined the anti-Trump deep state conspiracy.
With no name recognition, no money, and no media, the Jorgensen campaign helped cement the L.P.'s decadelong transformation into the third party in the United States.
Which leaves the U.S. without a major party even slightly inclined to leave people alone to manage their own affairs.
Trying to counter viral election fraud claims is like playing whack-a-mole. [With Updates]
Fox News interviewer Maria Bartiromo uncritically accepts Trump's outlandish conspiracy theory.
"The Campaign cannot win this lawsuit," the 3rd Circuit says. "The Campaign's claims have no merit."
We're expected to suffer discomfort, economic pain, and emotional distress or else pay fines or serve jail time. Government officials, meanwhile, take offense when called out for violating the standards they created.
Judge Stephanos Bibas, on behalf of unanimous panel, finds the Trump campaigns arguments have "no merit."
There’s no journalist more relentlessly iconoclastic than Greenwald, who won the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for his reporting on the Snowden revelations.
Unfortunately, I'd guess the party did just well enough in the last election to punt those discussions to another day.
The Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist on Joe Biden, free speech, and leaving The Intercept for Substack.
Aaron Van Langevelde, Brad Raffensperger, and other state and local officials did the right thing and steered America away from the precipice.
At least nine GOP senators are publicly urging the president to concede or questioning his claim that he actually won.
Donald Trump continues to refuse to concede.
Libertarian History/Philosophy
The libertarian philanthropist and CEO of Stand Together on their new book, Believe in People: Bottom-Up Solutions for a Top-Down World
Also: Thanksgiving tips and reasons for gratitude, from The Reason Roundtable
A statement signed by multiple VC contributors calling on Donald Trump and the Republican Party to accept the election result and stop promoting unsubstantiated accusations of fraud.
Both the president and his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, have publicly embraced Powell's wild claims about voting machine manipulation.
The Pennsylvania Senator offered an appropriate response to the Trump campaign's failed election litigation
U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann rejected an attempt to block certification of Pennsylvania's election results.
Without a shred of evidence, Sidney Powell is alleging a conspiracy more vast than Russiagate. Shouldn't that raise red flags?
His promotion of far-fetched conspiracy theories about the election is highly unlikely to change the results. But it is damaging, nonetheless.
Richard Epstein vs. Lawrence Lessig
Although the president's lawyer says the anti-Trump conspiracy is "easily provable," the affidavits he cites fall notably short.
The brief filed by Univ. of Texas law professor Sanford Levinson and myself explains why the Trump administration's efforts to exclude undocumented immigrants from the apportionment count for allocating seats in the House of Representatives goes against the text and original meaning of the Constitution.
Trump's hope that state legislatures will replace Democratic presidential electors with Republican electors will be dashed.
Post-election conspiracy-mongering demonstrates the limits of "libertarian populism."
Anyone who was rooting for both "teams" to lose on Election Day should be fairly satisfied right now.
St. Louis residents agree to shift to approval voting for local primaries.
With a lot of money spent for little results, the most recent election was a rebuttal to arguments for campaign finance reform.
Americans are nowhere close to embracing the radical left.
The president's rhetoric and his campaign's actions are corrosive, but even the most powerful man on the planet can't control America's diffuse election system.
Law professors Richard Epstein and Lawrence Lessig go head-to-head.
The fabulism that is inseparable from Trumpism can conjure up "millions" of stolen votes as easily as "more than a MILLION" protesters.
This is not your older brother's "Libertarian Moment," caution Reason Roundtable podcasters.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10