Election 2020

Sidney Powell Now Claims Election Conspiracy Involved Republican Gov. Brian Kemp, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders

Without a shred of evidence, Sidney Powell is alleging a conspiracy more vast than Russiagate. Shouldn't that raise red flags?

|

Sidney Powell, an election lawyer assisting the Trump campaign, has claimed that the president is the victim of a vast conspiracy to steal the 2020 Election that involved foreign powers, a corrupt software company, and other players.

On Saturday, Powell made even stronger claims during an interview on Newsmax. She accused Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican and key Trump ally, of accepting bribes from Dominion, the voting software company baselessly accused of switching millions of votes from Trump to Biden. She declined to provide evidence for this sensational claim, merely stating that the campaign's attorneys "have certainly been told there is evidence of that."

She then asserted that Hillary Clinton had used the same election-rigging software to defeat Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries. Sanders is well aware of this fraud, according to Powell, but "sold out" and kept his mouth shut.

"They informed Bernie of all their findings but he didn't do anything except get enough money to buy another fabulous house," said Powell.

One wonders, among other things, why the Clinton campaign was willing to commit this heinous crime in the primary—risking the end of the candidate's political aspirations and jail for all involved if apprehended—against an opponent she was going to defeat with relative ease, but not in the general election. Powell has no answer to that, of course. In fact, she has provided no evidence for any of her claims. Last week, she declined a request from Fox News host Tucker Carlson to review her evidence. Fox News contacted people within the Trump campaign, and none of them had seen a shred of evidence either.

Keep in mind that Powell is not some random gadfly: She has appeared alongside Rudy Giuliani at press conferences and has been a key spokeswoman for the legal effort to keep Donald Trump in the White House. What she is alleging is a vast conspiracy, involving millions of machine-altered votes, deceased dictator Hugo Chavez (who "couldn't even make the red lights work in Venezuela," notes Fox News personality Geraldo Rivera), and top Democrats and Republicans. If all of these people were in on this illegal scheme—which would be the most serious and unprecedented assault on American democracy in living memory—then there would need to be dozens or perhaps hundreds of staffers and support persons in the know as well.

It's important to comprehend the sheer size of this alleged corruption, because generally speaking, the more people involved in a sinister plot, the more likely it is to become exposed and fail. Already this is a conspiracy of significantly grander proportions than what was claimed by the most Russia-obsessed "collusion hoaxers," to borrow the phrasing of Trump supporters. That many in the media initially made much stronger claims about Russia's involvement in the 2016 election—significant, consequential collusion between President Vladimir Putin and the Trump campaign—than what was ultimately proven has been cited over and over again by Trump backers as reason to distrust the press. Doesn't that say something about the level of faith one should assign to these more even more incendiary claims—claims that are not supported by a single piece of evidence?

Those in the right-wing orbit who are defending Powell say that we must wait until she presents her evidence in court. Thus far, when campaign attorneys have appeared in court, they have made far milder claims, and even those have produced scant backing. That the allegations of significant and widespread fraud are reserved for press conferences and TV appearances in which ideologically loyal hosts provide little pushback should tell us something, too.

Extraordinary claims require significant proof, and the idea that Powell is actually sitting on some massive reveal—one that would shake this country to its core—seems increasingly far-fetched, in part because the tale she's telling grows ever more elaborate every time she opens her mouth. To say that she's straining credulity would be the understatement of the year.

On Sunday evening, Giuliani released a statement distancing the campaign's legal efforts from Powell: "Sidney Powell is practicing law on her own. She is not a member of the Trump legal team. She is also not a lawyer for the president in his personal capacity."

NEXT: Still Waiting for Drone Deliveries

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Doesn’t matter it’s over the fix was in from the beginning. Regroup republicans, try to hold the senate, get the house in 2 years, kick the prog left out in 2024.

    And remove liberaltarians from the discussion forever. Goodbye Koch brothers. Thanks for nothing.

    1. Koch was only libertarian when it was advantageous to his empire.

      1. Start making extra income Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by working just online. I have made $29K in this month by working online. Its a simple and easy home job and even a little child can do this job online and makes real money…►► WORK24HERE

          1. Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than aad regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
            on this page…..work92/7 online

      2. Super Simple Sales System Review ✅ Students are seeing 4 to 40x return on day ONE
        https://fstoppers.com/photo/532676

    2. “And remove liberaltarians from the discussion forever. Goodbye Koch brothers. Thanks for nothing.”

      LOL

      Koch-funded left-libertarianism is clearly the way of the future. It has seen tremendous victories in 2020 and 2018, and only lost in 2016 because Russia hacked the election.

      #BillionairesKnowBest
      #VoteDemocratToHelpCharlesKoch

    3. It’s a shame that the government will now need to be overthrown.

      1. Getting together with your militia buddies in the woods this weekend, are ya?

        1. Shoveling more bullshit this evening, are ya?
          Fuck off and die. Your family will thank you.

          1. Getting together with your fellow Trith Lords this weekend?

            1. Shoveling more bullshit this evening, are ya?
              Fuck off and die. Your family will thank you.

          2. Telling someone to fuck off and die all because you disagree on something as small and insipid as politics just seems immature.

            1. Let’s be clear that politics is not small and insipid

              It should be. But people like White Knight like to use it to coerce and steal from people.

              So we’re all forced into it, if I only for self defense.

            2. When those politics involve confiscatory taxes used for income redistribution it becomes something other than “small and insipid”.

        2. You’re just jealous because your Antifa pals are too busy burning down cities, to take you to go and frolic in the woods with the “militias”.

        3. No. I haven’t done anything. However, millions of Americans are waking up to he fact that Americans and progressives (like you) are incompatible. So you and your friends need to leave.

          1. You’ve been saying this here for a few years now. Come on Shitty…Genocide doesn’t start by itself. It needs brave leaders like you Nardz and the rest of the Chairborne to mobilize!

            1. Lolz …Chairborne. Yea, shithead is a member of the 101st Chairborne. His call sign is Brown-leader

              1. Well I’m o a action hero like you, but I do what little I can. Of course there are tens of millions of us that have all the guns. It also probably doesn’t help you progtards that you’re huge pussies that hate guns, can’t fight, and are just generally weak. Which is always showcased the moment fights back against your antifa buddies and isn’t outnumbered twelve to one.

                So I don’t need to be tough at all. As you and every one of your prog friends are worthless cowardly weaklings.

            2. You mean mass helicopter flights over shark-infested waters of political enemies? That’s not genocide, that’s what happens when commies get removed from power, shitheel. Learn the difference.

    4. CourseReel Review ✅ Create 100s of Video Courses without being an expert
      https://fstoppers.com/photo/532757

    5. Joe Biden announced Job opportunity for everyone! Work from comfort of your home…………VISIT HERE FOR FULL DETAIL.

    6. I am now making more than 350 dollars per day by working online from home without investing any money.Join this link posting job now and start earning without investing or selling anything.

      Follow Instructions Here……. Home Profit System

    7. Koch is like the other saboteurs who undermine the GOP and Libertarianism for their own Globalist reasons. They undermine America from the inside out. They are traitors of the worse kind. They acted like friends of freedom but are not.

      America cannot stand up for itself or have any say in its own destiny. It must become part of the COMINTERN.

    8. yeah, who wants that annoying freedom stuff?

  2. “Keep in mind that Powell is not some random gadfly: She has appeared alongside Rudy Giuliani at press conferences and has been a key spokeswoman for the legal effort to keep Donald Trump in the White House.”

    Oh my!

    “On Sunday evening, Giuliani released a statement distancing the campaign’s legal efforts from Powell…”

    Oh, so a random gadfly after all.

    About the only difference is that the media actually gave weight to the silly russiagate conspiracy theory where now they’ll dismiss anything and everything at all without a glance.

    1. Don’t sweat the small stuff! And it is ALL small stuff by now!

      Because you know what? Trump has finally conceded!

      STOP THE PRESSES!!! INSERT HOTTEST NEWS FLASH!!!

      My most-senior inside contact at the White House has surreptitiously slipped me an advance copy of the lame-duck POTUS’s concession speech. Without further ado, here it is:

      Friends, non-foreigner-type True Americans, and all who Make America Great Again, lend me your ears! I come to bury Biden, not to praise him. Biden and his minions stole the elections, and we must dishonor that! To Make America Great Again, we must invent the most fantastic, fabulous, YUUUGEST BIGNESS EVAH SEEN, in the ways of truly factually fictitious, but Spiritually and Metaphorically True, NEW Republican ballots! Because I have directed My Generals and My Scientists to research the current and past performance, efficacy, and patriotism of one-party states, versus multi-party states. As I have directed them to, My impartial, unbiased, data-driven council of My Generals and My Scientists have determined that yea verily, one-party states work better! Therefore, we must all strive for the Glorious Day, when America becomes a one-party state, under the One True Party, the Republican Party! (Pause for applause, to be continued).

      But for now, the courts have sided with Biden and his camel-toe, and Antifa, BLM, and all the Marxist terrorists. We must let the courts have it their way, with mayo on the side. I mean, with Mao Tse Tung on the side, but without the Proud Boys standing back and standing by. Thank you, Proud Boys, for having stood by me. Also, thank you, Steve Bannon, Vladimir Putin, Kim Ill Dung, and Pepe the Stolen-Intellectual-Property Frog. Pepe, watch out for Miss Piggy, she and her “pre-nuptial contracts” will clean your clock, just like Melania is set to clean mine soon! But I digest.

      So we can’t disrepute what the nasty courts have said, or there might be civil war. Sad! The courts aren’t very American these days! And if you don’t like what I just said? Well, I’m sorry that you feel that way!

      So congratulations to Biden for having stolen the elections! This is America, so we must properly honor the decisions of the courts, in a dishonorable way! Biden can come and live with us in the White House, per the wishes of the courts. He can pour our covfefe for us, for Steve Bannon, Pepe the Frog, and I, and Jill can make sandwiches for us. We promise to call him POTUS, and her, First Lady! POTUS of covfefe, and First Lady of sandwiches, that is! Hey Biden! Get yer butt over here! Pepe needs some covfefe!

      That setup will get us by for a little while! Meanwhile, we can schedule the NEW run-off elections, this time without any fraudulent so-called “Democratic” votes being allowed, and we can do this RIGHT the next time!

      Meanwhile, congratulations to Joe Stalin-Biden, on being elected POTUS of pouring covfefe for Pepe!

      1. Stop sqrlsy. Just stop it.

        We are sick of your witless blathering.

        And having shit for brains is not an excuse for fucking up your highly anticipated nap with the car running and garage door down.

        1. Don’t stop, SQRLSY. You are annoying the CACLLs!

            1. I get a kick out of working Sqrlsy up. It’s bullying sure, but it’s the same kind of laughs as getting the autistic kid in high school to spaz out. It’s actually pretty funny.
              Plus Sqrlsy, Hihn and Buttplug don’t do the lefties here any favours when they sperg out.

              And for those who are genuinely annoyed by scrolling through Sqrls demented copypasta, they can always hide it by flagging him.

              1. So you’ve always been a raging prick. Tulpa’s always been an asshole. News at 11.

          1. The White Knight
            October.22.2020 at 3:18 pm

            It means conservative and conservative-leaning libertarian, and I coined it.

            1. How………….
              pathetically ‘proud’.
              “SFLS”; Stupid Fucking Lefty Shit. But there’s no reason for me to claim the honors; they show up here regularly and need no set of initials; lefty shits does just fine.

          2. CACLL is the only kind of libertarian there is. Left libertarian is a logical impossibility.

            1. A libertarian that focuses more on civil rights abuses is to the left of one that focuses more on economic regulation.

              1. but since lefty politics is largely defined by civil rights abuses and/or state-mandated ‘fixes’ NOYB2 is correct. Left-libertarian is a logical impossibility.

                1. While I certainly see your point, I don’t think “left” is a well enough defined term for it to be a logical anything. There is certainly no such thing as a socialist libertarian. Or a welfare state libertarian. But “left” sometimes means things other than social and economic coercion.

        2. He’s already tried that. Too ba it was in a Prius.

    2. “Oh, so a random gadfly after all.”

      Except, as you yourself acknowledged, she was right by Giuliano’s side at the big press conference. She was very clearly part of the election challenge team, regardless of whether she was official or getting paid.

      1. She declined to provide evidence for this sensational claim, merely stating that the campaign’s attorneys “have certainly been told there is evidence of that.”

        Sounds like one of our Reason commentators sent her a tweet.

      2. So quoting the article which could easily be a third party retelling, a.k.a. hearsay, is acknowledging what exactly? I acknowledge that someone else said it, what else?

    3. That Tucker Carlson. He was always pushing Russiagate!

      1. Did progressivism make you an evil person? Or were you drawn to progressivism because of your inherent evil?

  3. We spent the last four years watching the establishment try and reverse the 2016 election in the most corrupt manner ever in American history, basically consisting of several coup attempts.

    Why is it suddenly unbelievable that they would fraud an election, Robby?

    1. It is unbelievable because there is no evidence of fraud on any significant scale. Also the Trump team conspiracy theories are getting nuttier by the day.

      1. Tell me again how a $150,000 in Facebook ads let Putin steal an election, but the biggest vote increase percentage in 120 years is just because people were “passionate”.

        1. They were passionate, about getting Trump the Cretin to vamoos.

          1. Your head wants company; stuff your TDS up your ass, you pathetic piece of shit.

            1. H&R’s Oscar Wilde.

              1. H&R’s commenter hoping for literate recognition. Are you hoping that’s found clever?

                1. I was hoping for intelligible, but clearly, I have set my hopes too high.

        2. it was not the biggest vote percentage in 120 years…please fact check your statements.

    2. Like that impeachment coup that would have installed President Pence in power!

      1. Is English your native language? Is there supposed to be a point there to be communicated to those who are English speakers?
        Or did your TDS jump out and type your bullshit for you?

      2. What is funny about this is that I recommended the Republicans do this as Pence was a better bet for them. President Pence would very likely have done a much better job addressing Covid19 and would very likely have won election in 2020. Republicans would be looking at control of both the Presidency and the Senate in 2021. As it now stands Biden is President Elect and the Senate is still in limbo.

        By the way, note that Trump is doing nothing for the Georgia Republicans. Basically if he can’t win he does not care.

  4. Come on, Robby.

    On Saturday, Powell made even stronger claims during an interview on Newsmax. She accused Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican and key Trump ally, of accepting bribes from Dominion, the voting software company baselessly accused of switching millions of votes from Trump to Biden. She declined to provide evidence for this sensational claim, merely stating that the campaign’s attorneys “have certainly been told there is evidence of that.”

    That’s just one paragraph. I’ve eliminated a few words for you to remove some opinion markers. The story stays the same, but looks less biased.

    1. But you removed all the words that keep him getting paid.

    2. the claims were stronger, the charge was baseless. the claim was sensationalized….. just because it sounds biased to you does not make it inaccurate.

      1. Is this a new standard in journalism? I’ve only seen this sort of thing very recently when talking about things involving Trump. Would have been nice to see these words and phrases being used in articles about, say, Obamacare or the Iraq War.

        1. it has never been a point of bias to state that something is baseless, larger, or sensationalized….. the fact that these words underline just how stupid all this is does not make it bias…… is that easier for you to understand? those words do not actually carry any judgement, they are accurate descriptors.

          1. Rape allegations against Kavanaugh were deemed credible although they were baseless and sensational.

            1. and where did i say it would have been bias to use those words to describe them?

          2. Reason is an opinion journal, oh would-be editors.

    3. Robby can’t help the incessant bleating. He wants to be one of the cool kids.

  5. FWIW Russiagate didn’t have a single sworn affidavit nor a shred of evidence. Right now there is actually lots of evidence, but it’s not necessarily proof at this point.

    1. what there is is a glaring lack of evidence.

  6. Scott Adams posited this morning that the Venezuelan military officer eyewitness was disinformation based on the fact that no photo was shown and he hadn’t been on interviews. It did make sense although it was pretty off the wall. But now in light of Sidney Powell getting thrown under the bus it really seems plausible.

    Well good. I’m glad everything in the election was on the up and up. Phew!

    On an unrelated note, can anyone recommend a nice remote mountain cabin location only accessible by foot?

    1. Accessible by drone might be a bigger deal.

    2. Soooo, what you are saying is that Rudy G is part of the Deep State conspiracy and threw Powell under the bus for telling the truth?

      Or is it that Powell is part of the Deep State conspiracy and telling wild stories about commies coming to get your daughters pregnant to spread more communism that way she could get the Trump campaign lawyers discredited?

      Or are they both part of the deep state to sow even more confusion?

      I can’t tell which way to go with these conspiracy theories. They all make so much convoluted sense.

      1. It has been very very difficult to tell the difference between this comment section and the comment section on Faux News for quite some time now.

        1. I was thinking the same thing. I was expecting some sort of rational discussion down here, but I suppose not.

          1. they happen, but they do get drowned out.

        2. “Faux News”

          And I thought the comment section was locked in to parroting thoughtless memes! What’s next? “No blood for oil!”?

          1. Out of all of this, that is what you take exception to? Mmk.

  7. I trust Sidney Powell more than Robby Soave. She has an excellent track record in court reversing previous injustices by government officials.

    1. Same here. She’s a serious attorney who’s been proven right many times in the past. I’m reserving judgement at this point.

      1. TRUMP DON’T NEED NO EVIDENCE!

        WE WAS ROBBED!

        1. You never needed any evidence, did you Kiddie Raper?

          1. You QAnon nutjobs don’t know what evidence is.

            Have you found that pizza shop with the child sex ring underneath it yet?

            1. Asking for a friend?

              1. Well he does support Creepy Joe. Now we know the REAL issue he was voting on.

            2. “You QAnon nutjobs don’t know what evidence is.”

              KIddy-diddlers who got banned from a site showed any and all what evidence is, kiddy-diddler who got banned from a site.
              Do you still show your face in public?

            3. No, but there was certainly evidence of the child porn you posted here. You are a pedophile. With luck, someone will torture and kill you for your pedophilia.

              We can only hope your suffering is truly legendary and unending.

            4. Not sure why this was never picked up, but turns out NAMBLA endorsed Creepy Joe this election.

      2. And just like that, Super Sid is kicked to the curb. Ba ha ha. Probably a conspiracy in there somewhere.

        1. My goodness! What a, uh, comment…
          Did you have a point?

          1. I guess I should find a box of digital crayons to explain. The Trumpista “stop the steal” folks have been babbling about how Sidney Powell was this very serious attorney who would set things right. And now Team Trump is all in on Rudy Giuliani. I find that amusing, much more so than the inevitable ex post facto justification that dumping Powell is part of some Zulu warlock legal strategy or how this somehow proves they were right all along. Hey, I get it. You’re busy on your conspiracy theory hamster wheel. Don’t mind me.

            1. Apparently Sevo has no awareness of which way is up or down so a hamster wheel fits him just fine.

    2. Its all a deep state conspiracy, right? So Powell was telling the truth and Rudy G got rid of her? Or was she part of the deep state and Rudy G found out? I don’t know which way to go, will you enlighten me?

  8. Agreed. And I would rephrase your first sentence. This is not, nor ever was, about Trump. What animates Sidney Powell–and indeed the MAJORITY of the American people’s support for her–is not that “the president is the victim of a vast conspiracy”. It is that WE ARE. WE, the People. Remember us? That is why this will not go away. Remember who this more than half of the country is. No snowflakes, here.

    1. The amount of shit-giving about Trump voters is over. They have shown their true colors in supporting this ongoing effort to overturn a legal and clean election. They are not patriots, they do not support the values of our country, and as far as I care they can all go to hell.

      1. Legal and clean . . . 30% of democrat voters think something is up. But why investigate anything? It’s ‘well known’ and ‘common sense’ that everything is legit.

        1. I have been hearing that argument for weeks “we just want to investigate to make sure it was all legal”. But that proved to be a fake argument as soon as Trump called the Michigan legislators to the WH to browbeat them to throw out all the votes. Those who did not denounce that despicable move proved they did not stand with America.

          1. If that happened, it’s bullshit, but you have a whole side here that is insisting that everyone just accept ‘the results’ while at the same time blocking any inspection of such.

            You have a record number of people who believe that shenanigans occured. So, show them.

            1. It did happen, and all the Trump nuts were ok with it. And this has been the most scrutinized election in history.

              1. If it’s been so scrutinized, show that.

                This isn’t HARD. Transparency in the process is what allows the ‘plebes’ to trust it. Show them. Don’t hide it.

                1. She won’t because she doesn’t care.

                  She’s like Kirkland, just with less overt shoving things down people’s throats.

                  1. We owe leftists nothing.
                    They are cancer, and their lives have no value.

                    1. Said every fascist ever. Seriously, you’re going to be much happier on some other forum where there are no libertarians who–as a group–tend to oppose ethnic cleaning, genocide, mass murder, concentration camps, cattle cars, inquisitions, and other tools of the trade for jackboots who decide “the others” lives have no value. That said, we generally understand that Internet chest thumpers are harmless pansies who represent zero real world threat to anyone.

                    2. Your little bitch ass isn’t a libertarian, you’re a leftist who doesn’t have the balls or the brains to be honest about your position.
                      Well, since you want 3rd word style “democracy” (dictatorship) I’m ok with 3rd world style death squads.
                      Your life has no value.

                    3. Nardz, you are such a dork.

              2. “… And this has been the most scrutinized election in history…”

                You keep repeating that an so lefty shit, here’s a hint: Claims by lefty shits =/= evidence or argument.
                Prove your claim. Put up or STFU, lefty shit.

              3. “All the Trump nuts” does not make up all of the American people who think something looks funny about this election.

          2. If this fraudulent election isn’t overturned, then the rule of law in America is over and anything goes. If that happens, then there is no more reason to hold back. It will be time to remove the progressives.

          3. He ‘called to the WH’ people he has no authority over? To browbeat people who could walk away at any moment?

        2. 90 percent of Democratic voters think single payer works.

        3. You’ve quoted this 30% of Democrat voters stat before. Cite?

          1. Cite?”

            Lol, fuck off you fraud. We all know that the last thing in the world you want is a cite on that.

            1. That’s odd. The Rasmussen page linked to doesn’t quote those numbers.

              1. What it does say: “Sixty-one percent (61%) of Republicans say it’s Very Likely the Democrats stole the election, but just as many Democrats (61%) say it’s Not At All Likely. Among unaffiliateds, 29% feel it’s a stolen election; 45% do not.” So 39% of Democrats believe in some other level of likelihood it was stolen. Have to be a Platinum member of Rasmussen for the breakdown. Source: https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/61_think_trump_should_concede_to_biden

                1. Not “it’s not at all likely” =/= “believe in some level of likelihood”. The 39% of Democrats would include not likely and don’t have an opinion tranches.

                2. Dunning Kruger strikes again!

      2. Jeff’s trying to tamp down this thread as hard as he can. He’s earning his fifty-cents tonight.

      3. “…They have shown their true colors in supporting this ongoing effort to overturn a legal and clean election…”

        Is this now about CNN, the NYT, the Chron, MSNBC, etc?
        You’re right, and they’ve done so for four years.

      4. What’s wrong with asking the court to look at it? What are you trying to hide?

        1. Not conceding when there’s the appearance of shenanigans is the death of democracy but lying to a secret court to investigate the opposition party’s nominee is totally above the board.

          1. That’s Sullum’s value statement.

        2. What’s wrong with it? He’s a Republican! That’s what’s wrong with it.

      5. Whatever happened to your sleepy leader’s call for unity?

      6. Buddy, the Democrats spent most of the last 4 years doing the same.

        I ain’t defending Trump here – but beams and motes and all that.

    2. “Remember who this more than half of the country is.” ummmm…. the numbers do not back you up on this one…..

  9. According to Lin Wood, the statement about Sidney wasn’t exactly as bad as what the media is suggesting.

    “@SidneyPowell1 & I are more alike than we are different. We are fighting different legal battles for the same clients – We The People. The People voted overwhelmingly to re-elect

    @realDonaldTrump

    All interests are aligned. #FightBack”

    Could have been a strategic decision just to clarify that she is independent? It makes Trump look better if she is successful and doesn’t affect him as much if she isn’t

    1. No!!!
      You’re not suggesting that something regarding Trump got spun, are you?
      Not possible! Nope.

  10. Did something happen to Sidney Powell? This feels similar to the theory that henry viii received a traumatic brain injury…she tends to be very credible…or at least she used to be…

    1. Yes, she disagreed with the narrative. The duck weighing scales are coming out tonight.

  11. The reason this is happening is because a fat chunk of the country has no faith in the media and is scared to death of what the Democrats are planning to do to them once Biden is in office.

    You can yell at them for that.

    Or we can talk about 1) Why so many Americans are so afraid of the Democrats and 2) Why so many American have little or no faith in the media.

    If their reasons are valid, someone should address their concerns.

    1. Come on, man! Why are you so afraid of unity?

      1. Unity under the whip of government rule is always so grand just ask those in china or n korea

    2. Half of Americans don’t trust the other half. Film at 11. On the news channel that half of America thinks is beyond reproach because the the other news channel is lying 100 percent of the time. It’s tribalism, Ken, or the Star Trek episode with the white-black guy and the black-white guy getting their hate on.

      1. Except it’s not half and half. It’s about 20% vs. 20%, trying to drag the other 60% into their partisan feud.

        1. Agreed, but accuracy was sacrificed for rhetorical purposes.

          1. Understood

          2. Well, accuracy was actually sacrificed for bullshit prurposes.

        2. So 20% good guys, 20% evil guys, and 60% chaff blowing in the wind.

          1. Actually, no. I’d put it more at 20% right wing authoritarian assholes and 20% left wing authoritarian assholes. I’ll go with 55% trying to ignore the incessant bickering between the assholes and let’s say 5% looking for the exits.

      2. The difference is that one side wants live free, and the other wants to enslave everyone. Best we just eliminate the slavers.

        1. Live free? In what country do you reside?

    3. Talk about absolute shit reasoning that gets holes poked easily when you simply switch the nouns around.

      “The reason this is happening is because a fat chunk of the country has no faith in (the sanity of the current US president) and is scared to death of what the (Republicans) are planning to let him get away with.

      You can yell at them for that.

      Or we can talk about 1) Why so many Americans are so afraid of the Republicans (they always lose pop vote, and lost badly here) and 2) Why so many American have little or no faith in anything the president says, as its always a lie.”

      Gotta try harder man, dont think you could win a debate with Tony with this level of thought

      1. Both your “questions” are suppositions more dishonest than you accuse Trump of being.

      2. Whose sock are you?

    4. the more important question would be 3) why are they willing to accept random things from nutjobs as gospel truth without any evidence?

      that they don’t trust media is one thing…… that they put blind trust into nonsense is the problem.

      1. When you are convinced someone is lying to you, it is easy to accept what is counter to those lies.

        1. confirmation bias is definitely at the heart of it, it just seems so counter-intuitive. i can understand not trusting the media, but trusting a source with even less checks and balances seems like a poor response to that.

  12. Conservatives have been trafficking in nutty conspiracy theory since the John Birchers claimed flouride in water was a communist plot to sap Americans of their manlihood.

    Glenn Beck would be proud of this latest whopper – mixing Hugo Chavez, Cuba, communism, vaccines, and George Soros into some nutty election fraud scheme.

    Come to think of it, this Sidney Powell might be Beck in drag. He’s had time for a sex change since getting booted off Fox News.

    1. “Come to think of it, this Sidney Powell might be Beck in drag. He’s had time for a sex change since getting booted off Fox News.”

      You are just trash.

      1. Sidney is quite a bit masculine looking. Look at that pic. I could well be Beck in drag. It’s up to you to prove she’s not him.

        1. Her metaphorical balls are bigger than your physical ones, but that doesn’t make her a man.

          1. The great thing about metaphorical balls is that they are limited in size only by our imaginations.

        2. You’re a pedophile. Best you commit suicide before you’re tortured to death by one of your former victims, or one of heir family members.

        3. Sounds like transphobic rhetoric to me. Hypocrite.

      2. I mean, he linked to a child porn site and never paid his bet so being trash is a given.

    2. “…Conservatives have been trafficking in nutty conspiracy theory since the John Birchers claimed flouride in water was a communist plot to sap Americans of their manlihood…”

      Kiddie-diddler combines lies with more lies.

    3. Liberals are still talking about Russia.

    1. They neglected to call the Sidney Powell fan club here on H&R. Fools.

      1. Only thing odder than Powell’s story is lap83’s Powell fandom.

        Pretty sure I saw some of the same exact comments from the same person on Twitter.

        1. That’s not throwing her under the bus, but hivemind units such as you “and” jose aren’t smart enough to realize it.

          1. Under the bus may be a step too far. But off the bus is inarguable.

        2. I thought she was being thrown under the bus until I saw people with more knowledge than me explain that she is lfighting on behalf of the People and her funding isn’t from Trump. No political motivation in her, just loyalty and a desire for truth. And since I’m not a trash person like you, I think those are good things

    2. Oh GEE! TDS asshole finds a member of the legal staff fired!
      Never happened in the history of mankind! TDS asshole’s head explodes!

      1. Calm down Sevo. Careful, you might stroke out if you can’t control your rage and then we would all be deprived of your keen insight and clever wit.

        1. That’s rich coming from you, Jeff.

        2. Stuff it up your ass, MSO.

  13. Trump, and basically anyone calling themselves a Republican these days, is a piece of shit or a lunatic. Take your pick.

    1. Very open minded of you.

      1. Yes, he should have a mind so open his brains leak out.

        1. From one who lost long ago what passed for a brain.
          Fuck off and die.

    2. LoS is a an ignorant lefty shit proposing to tell us about others; take your pick.

    3. So are the Democrats. You’ve come to the wrong place for sympathy.

    4. There are a few showing some integrity, or maybe just better sense of when to jump ship: Romney, Christie, …

      1. “There are a few showing some integrity, or maybe just better sense of when to jump ship: Romney, Christie, …”

        Lefty shit WK posted this; I only copied and pasted.

      2. “Romney has integrity”

        Lol, WK’s definition of Republican integrity is limited to politicians who will align themselves to DNC intrests.

        1. He’s a big McCain fan.

      3. Romney was never on the ship, idiot.

    5. The biggest problem with Republicans is that they won’t cut spending.

    6. And rhetoric like this is why gun sales are up.
      You are not paranoid, if they are out to get you.

  14. It’s be nice if, before dismissing such claims, there was some indication that they had actually been investigated first. They may be bogus, but just writing them off out of hand seems questionable.

    1. This has been the most scrutinized election in history. The investigations quickly debunk the accusations, then the Trumpers just make up new accusations, it is an endless loop. Nothing will make them happy cause they don’t care about truth.

      1. The media, and the TechGiants have acted to suppress the truth.

        Cover-ups only lend credence to claims being covered up.

        If even 50% (let alone 70%) of Republican voters believe election tabulation is significantly fraudulent, that is not my problem.

        Sure, if I encounter a comment claiming a fraudulent election, I will ask the commenter to make their case, but that is it. I will not further challenge the commenter, even if commenter’s case is much weaker than the case Tariq Nasheed made.

        Let those like Larry Tribe and the Axis of Unethical Conduct challenge these claims.

      2. “This has been the most scrutinized election in history…”

        Right off of, oh, CNN, right?
        Your claim; prove it, you scummy piece of lefty shit.
        You can’t; you, or someone you got that from, pulled that out of your ass, and didn’t bother to remove the stink before you posted it.
        Lefty shits are not moral enough to be embarrassed…

        1. Says the traitor ok with disfranchising the citizens of entire states.

          1. “Says the traitor ok with disfranchising the citizens of entire states.”

            Cite or:
            You.
            Are.
            Full.
            Of.
            Shit.
            And I’m sure your can’t offer such a cite, as you can’t for your bullshit claim of ‘most scrutinized election’.
            You’re simply a pathetic piece of lefty shit who is terrified that Trump might be right, and scumbags like you will have to accept 4 more years of your hopes being bashed.
            Fuck off and die a long, slow, PAINFUL death; what you deserve and what will make the world a better place.

            1. How did we go from waging a world war against people like you, who we shot and bombed until unconditional surrender to now, where you are in our country and pissing on our constitution.

              1. “How did we go from waging a world war against people like you, who we shot and bombed until unconditional surrender to now, where you are in our country and pissing on our constitution.”

                I’m going to assume your are a victim of government schools, and that, somehow, that pile of lefty shit is intended to express a logical claim…
                Well, no, on further examination, I’m not. Fuck off and die, lefty shit.

              2. BTW, scumbag, still looking for cites to back your lies and quite sure you will never deliver same.
                Make your dog happy; fuck off and die.

              3. How did we go from waging a world war against people like you, who we shot and bombed until unconditional surrender

                No, you’re confused, Jeff. The Allies won the war, not your team. Remember? Your boss and his wife killed themselves.

          2. Umm…Molly and her liberal friends have disenfranchised MY VOTE.

      3. “This has been the most scrutinized election in history.”

        Why hasn’t anyone inspected the Dominion source code?

        It boggles my mind how these lazy, luddite politicians can select an election tool without bothering to inspect how it works. And from a Canadian company no less. It needs to be open source or we don’t use it…period.

      4. What investigations? What evidence? Reported where?

        Given that we don’t have a functioning press anymore, how do you know what’s actually true?

    2. Speaking of writing, maybe Powell could write the claims down or give some details to support what she is claiming.

      1. What do you think she’s been doing? Legal papers aren’t grade school stuff.

        1. Yes but WK needs a cite to ignore once he gets it.

        2. She’s been hand waving in press conferences.

          1. Well the court of public opinion is a thing too.

        3. What legal papers?

          1. The ones she’s writing up.

            1. Any day now…

    3. the poll workers in one precinct were zombies…. we need to investigate……

      that is not how this shit works…… you can’t just make absurd claims and insist we investigate them. you need some fucking evidence that there is something to investigate.

  15. “Yes,” Chris Christie tells @GStephanopoulos when asked if it’s time for President Trump to stop challenging the 2020 election results, adding that the president’s legal team has been a “national embarrassment.” ABC

    When you lose Chris Christie and he calls your legal team an “embarrassment” it’s time to quit.

    But Trump fans are delusional as we know.

    Keep fighting Donnie Boy!

    1. “…When you lose Chris Christie and he calls your legal team an “embarrassment” it’s time to quit…”

      Yep, I’m sure Christie is the example that anyone other than a scummy lefty shit would choose as an example.
      What does cherry-picking pay these days, turd?

      1. Your loyalty to your Trith overload, Trump, is commendable. Some Trith, like Lord Christie, are weaker in their faith and are jumping ship.

        1. Your stupidity and TDS symptoms are not commendable, lefty shit.

        2. Trith overload

          No idea what this means but I get the sense that I should be embarrassed for you.

          1. He thinks he’s being clever by mixing tump and sith together. He’s not.

            (I’m not sure if he thinks the Democrats are the Jedi, but that wouldn’t really surprise me)

            1. It is really desperate for the left to praise it.
              It will not breathe much longer.

        3. What the heck is “Trith”?

    2. Chris Christie seems to have gotten off the Trump bus ever since he caught the coronavirus while helping Trump prep for the debates.

      1. As usual, WK and Buttplug take shit out of context.

        Christie criticized the legal team, not the premise.

        “if you’ve got the evidence of fraud, present it. Quite frankly the conduct of the president’s legal team has been a national embarrassment.”

        1. Whatever. Christie broke ranks by saying what he said.

          1. Cherry-picking paying a living wage to lefty shits?

          2. “Whatever. Christie broke ranks by saying what he said.”

            Independent thought from a political ally too alien a concept for a Democrat?

            1. I’m sure Trump will not see it as disloyalty. Nope. No, sir. He welcomes dissent.

    3. Two words: Bridge…Gate. The man has been a laughing stock for years.

    4. Chris Christie is one of those guys that both sides can point to as the lowest common denominator. You can dismiss him when he says something you disagree with because he’s a joke. When he says something you agree with you can say: “See? Even Chris Christie agrees that Trump is nuts.”

      Similar figures are Mitt Romney, Piers Morgan, John McCain, Justice John Roberts.

      All I’m asking is that you treat them with consistency. Do these people have integrity, or have they gone nuts? Are they incompetent and evil, or are they the only ones who have principles?

  16. More vast than Russiagate? Sure that should raise red flags. Russiagate was just the normal amount of conspiracy.

    1. Note MG, above makes this claim:

      “…They have shown their true colors in supporting this ongoing effort to overturn a legal and clean election…”

      Further note that Trump is still POTUS until at least early next year, so shame on him for making sure he wasn’t cheated!
      And of course, the 4-year effort by NYT, CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, and so on and so on, to overturn that last legal and clean election are ‘old news’, right?

  17. TDS heads *EXPLODE*:

    “Putin praises Trump as ‘talented,’ says liberalism has ‘become obsolete'”
    […]
    “Russian President Vladimir Putin in a new interview praised President Trump as a “talented” person, saying that despite not being a career politician Trump knew how to relate to voters.
    “Mr. Trump is not a career politician,” Putin told The Financial Times. “I do not accept many of his methods when it comes to addressing problems. But do you know what I think? I think that he is a talented person. He knows very well what his voters expect from him.”
    […]
    “Russia has been accused, and, strange as it may seem, it is still being accused … of alleged interference in the U.S. election,” he said. “What happened in reality? Mr. Trump looked into his opponents’ attitude to him and saw changes in American society, and he took advantage of this.”
    Mueller’s report found that Russia engaged in an effort to interfere in the presidential election. It did not find sufficient evidence to conclude a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Moscow took place…”
    https://thehill.com/policy/international/450756-putin-praises-trump-as-a-talented-because-he-know-what-voters-expect

    Yep, those GIFs MUST have been a result of the Russian government; no one else is so incompetent, unless we include the hag for consideration…

    1. Nice meltdown

      1. So we record the first head explode?
        Can we assume the handle ‘a libertarian’ is yet one more false flag from a lefty shit? Or do we need to wait for a bit more evidence?

      2. “Nice meltdown”

        His crazed rants are reminiscent of someone that used to frequently post here that had problems with his anger and the CAPS LOCK button. Congrats Sevo, those are some big shoes to fill. I’m sure you’re up to the task.

        1. “His crazed rants are reminiscent of someone that used to frequently post here that had problems with his anger and the CAPS LOCK button. Congrats Sevo, those are some big shoes to fill. I’m sure you’re up to the task.”

          So we can record you as the first TDS head explosion?
          Whose sock are you? Just asking, since, like most lefty shit socks (“a libertarian”, above) we have a brand new handle with claimed historical knowledge of the commenters here.
          So it’s pretty much a given that you are a pathetic piece of lefty shit who has been handed his/her hat in the past, and now you hope to show up with a new name and avoid the rep you so greatly earned under your last handle?
          Who are you hiding from and why? Or, more directly, why should anyone here take your bullshit to be anything other than bullshit?
          Fuck off and die, as I’m sure I’ve suggested to you in the past, lefty shit.

          1. Because only lefties disagree with Sevo, and only mentally ill people are lefty.

            Therefore, if you disagree with Sevo, you are mentally ill. QED.

            This is fact, not opinion.

            1. Congratulations on your first sock, Sevo. May it serve you well.

  18. So we can expect more of this shit until December 14th. If there’s nothing by then, we can all move on.

    Personally I could care less, my life stays the same either way. I’m really not that interested in abortion rights anymore, and let’s face it, that’s the only thing really different about the two parties.

    1. That $11T for the modified GND is chopped liver?

    2. “Personally I could care less, my life stays the same either way”

      No it doesn’t, but libertarians have really devoted themselves to blind faith in institutions and norms these days.

      1. No, they haven’t. The problem is the opposite. They have so much distrust and reflexive hostility towards government institutions (like the White House) that TDS came naturally to them.

        Trump President, therefore Trump bad! – libertarians.

        Libertarians care more about “muh freedomz” then they do about what’s good for this country. Nardz, you are not a libertarian, and I mean that as a compliment. I don’t know why you pretend to be, you seem to have more sense then most of the people around here.

        Genuine question: if you see the threat that Marxist speech and Marxist thought represent, as well as the threat of low IQ savages invading this country and ghetto hoodlums burning down our cities, and the clear use of anti-racism to tear down western civilization, how in the ever loving hell can you possibly think that *moar freedomz* are needed when all these problems are caused by the system weakness in our institutions called *classical liberalism*?

        I do not understand the worldview of someone who calls themselves a conservative and a libertarian when throughout history the terms are mutually exclusive. Libertarians are just left wingers who pretend to themselves that they are not.

    3. This post is not going to age well…

    1. Why is it that threads like this get all sorts of ‘new’ handles who seem to recognize the regular commenters, and always seem at least close to capsizing to port?
      There are many on the right here with whom I do not agree in detail, but, AFAIK, none of them (and certainly not me) have reverted to socks to add support to their arguments; lefty shits seem incapable of doing the same. In fact, they incapable of NOT doing so.
      What is is about the left that we now have HamSandwich, M. Stack Overflow, a libertarian, not to mention WK, all seemingly worn-out left shits now posting under new handles?
      Why are lefty shits so interested in avoiding the reps which they so richly deserve? They certainly should be embarrassed, but, as a general rule, their stupidity is such that they probably don’t recognize how stupid they are until they want to post again:
      “WOW! Did I really post that? Better change my handle, right now!”
      You been busted, lefty shits.

      1. I’ve been posting here for over a year you giant dummy. Nice self own yet again

  19. Might be worth a look before making sweeping announcements that there is absolutely no fraud, whatsoever:

    https://hereistheevidence.com/

    They are ‘aggregating publicly available items of evidence that would be admissible in court, not general election news stories or updates.’

    Of course, being a loyal Reason reader for over a decade, I’ll totally take the word of Soave, Sullum, Boehm and Co. They would never arrogantly dismiss any and all allegations of wrongdoing without a very compelling reason!

    1. Don’t let White Knight read that list of cites. His head will explode.

    2. I have gone through at least a dozen of the links and found nothing very convincing. I did find a purported video of “ballots switched at post office” that is actually a YouTube clip from “The Grinch Who Stole Christmas.”

      I think it would be silly to say there is “absolutely no fraud, whatsoever” about any election, anywhere, ever. However, I’ve seen no evidence that this election has featured more fraud, any giant conspiracy to commit fraud, or fraud that benefits one side more than the other on balance. I did see a cute video of the Grinch sorting mail, though.

      1. Thanks for saving me the trouble. My head would have exploded, you know.

      2. I’ve seen no evidence that the entity posting to your account is human.

      3. or fraud that benefits one side more than the other on balance.

        Translation: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

    3. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

      a collection of tweets? that is your evidence? STFU.

  20. No sane person is saying there was zero fraud. Straw man argument, that. The question is whether there is any credible evidence of fraud extensive enough to influence the outcome. And if that fraud favors one side over the other. And if the evidence stands up to scrutiny. For all of the talk of fraud, one would think the court record for Team Trump would be better.

    1. “…For all of the talk of fraud, one would think the court record for Team Trump would be better.”

      Lefty assertions =/= evidence or argument. I’ll take your opinions as what they seem to be worth from your posts:
      cero.

      1. Some thirty-odd election-related lawsuits filed by Team Trump. No election results overturned by a court yet. Cero victorias y treinta derrotas.

    2. When you hide what you’re doing it tends to produce that effect.

      1) Why can’t we inspect the Dominion software to prove “votes can’t be switched” as their CEO claims? Make it open source if you want to quash the accusations.
      2) Why prevent Republican poll watchers from observing the count?

      If you’re not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to hide.

      1. Clearly, any software company unwilling to publish its proprietary code for the world to see must be hiding something.

        1. It beggars belief to think that there is any intellectual property around the software needed to run a counting machine that could utilize 1980’s code. Does switching from a #2 pencil to black/blue ink to fill in the circle somehow require advanced software?

          Ballot goes in, reads box, reports result. The very idea that some sort of special software is need to this simply screams ‘fraud risk!’

      2. “If you’re not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to hide.” Said every proponent of the police state ever.

        1. Except that these concerns were taken seriously back when Warren and Klobuchar were raising them in 2019. Now, it’s “fake news”.

          If you want us to rely on your software, we need to know exactly what is happening underneath the hood.

        2. Yes, but it’s rather different when you are saying that to government and politicians. There is no expectation of privacy or anonymity in that space and there shouldn’t be.

  21. Fuck you you hypocritical leftist cunt. You demand zero evidence before you hop on the “Kavanaugh is a rapist” bandwagon. You demand zero evidence before proclaiming Russia rigged the 2016 election and you spent months defending violent rioters destroying cities across this country. I’m done with you evil motherfuckers.

    1. Is that a promise. Bye bye.

      1. I’m hoping the lefty shit with the the sock handle WK fucks off and dies, WK.
        Make your family proud!

      2. Why is it that threads like this get all sorts of ‘new’ handles who seem to recognize the regular commenters, and always seem at least close to capsizing to port?
        There are many on the right here with whom I do not agree in detail, but, AFAIK, none of them (and certainly not me) have reverted to socks to add support to their arguments; lefty shits seem incapable of doing the same. In fact, they incapable of NOT doing so.
        What is is about the left that we now have HamSandwich, M. Stack Overflow, a libertarian, not to mention WK, all seemingly worn-out left shits now posting under new handles?
        Why are lefty shits so interested in avoiding the reps which they so richly deserve? They certainly should be embarrassed, but, as a general rule, their stupidity is such that they probably don’t recognize how stupid they are until they want to post again:
        “WOW! Did I really post that? Better change my handle, right now!”
        You been busted, lefty shits.

    2. the other side did awful shit that was wrong….. we want to do the same thing and pretend it isn’t wrong……

      tip for you…… if you ever justify your actions this way, you are a fucking hypocrite…… you are someone who screamed at the top of your lungs when the other side did it, and now you think it should be just fine for you to do it.

    3. But those weren’t “baseless” accusations. They were “credible”. Remember?

  22. The fact that Hugo Chavez was able to rig an American presidential election, seven years after dying, makes him the baddest badass to ever walk the earth.

    1. He didn’t rig the election he made it possible to rig the election. It’s his legacy. His evil legacy.

  23. Why is it that threads like this get all sorts of ‘new’ handles who seem to recognize the regular commenters, and always seem at least close to capsizing to port?
    There are many on the right here with whom I do not agree in detail, but, AFAIK, none of them (and certainly not me) have reverted to socks to add support to their arguments; lefty shits seem incapable of doing the same. In fact, they incapable of NOT doing so.
    What is is about the left that we now have HamSandwich, M. Stack Overflow, a libertarian, not to mention WK, all seemingly worn-out left shits now posting under new handles?
    Why are lefty shits so interested in avoiding the reps which they so richly deserve? They certainly should be embarrassed, but, as a general rule, their stupidity is such that they probably don’t recognize how stupid they are until they want to post again:
    “WOW! Did I really post that? Better change my handle, right now!”
    You been busted, lefty shits.

    1. The White Knight is a new handle?

    2. Lol. Flagged as SPAM. Take your meds and go to bed.

    3. I think there’s actually only nine or ten commenters here. The rest is socks all the way down.

  24. Leftists are not people, they are a hivemind.
    They have no human rights.
    Remember this as you contemplate what you should do when you encounter one.

    1. I think the creatures are more like a swarm of locust. They ravage the countryside and when they consume all of everyone else’s resources, they simply migrate to red states and do the same thing.

    2. Right, they are not like corporations that do have human rights. We have to get our priorities straight don’t we.

    3. Keep the hate alive, dude.

    4. Why are all the Trump cheerleaders such angry weirdos? Maybe you guys should take a break from posting on the Internet for a while. This can’t be good for your mental health.

      1. Why do you Biden ass eaters eat so much ass?

        1. Pro tip. It’s a libertarian website. The whole “anyone who disagrees me must be a leftist, progtard, socialist, etc.,” doesn’t work here. In fact, it just makes you look like a Gadsden flag waving nutter. We’re fuck Trump and the Republicans. We’re also fuck Biden and the Democrats. Some of us are even fuck the big “L” Libertarian Party. Night watchman minarchist ass eater… guilty!

          1. “We’re fuck Trump and the Republicans”

            The very definition of a leftist, progtard, socialist, etc.

            Thanks for outing yourself.

            Conservatism and libertarianism are incompatible. Dump libertarianism, and you’ll get a better America.

            Tyrannizing the left is how you get liberty.

            Fact, not opinion.

            1. You don’t know what a definition is, apparently.

            2. Beautiful self own.

          2. What’s wrong with the Gadsden flag?

    5. Yeah, let’s dehumanize people we disagree with. That always leads to good places. What could possibly go wrong?

    6. That perfectly explains why every single Republican Senator votes how Trump tells them to.

  25. NICE JOB FOR EVERY ONE CHEK DETAIL OPEN THIS LINK……… CLICK HERE FOR FULL DETAIL

  26. Why did Trump lose? One word: NIGGERS. If not for the niggers, he would have one in a landslide. Why should niggers, barely sentient apes, control our country?

    1. Die in a grease fire.

    2. Behold another propaganda attack by DNC and/or China on the US

      1. China, Russia, and our other adversaries are just sitting back laughing their asses off while we beat ourselves up. They didn’t have to do a thing.

    3. Great, now Jussie Smollett is lurking around here.

    4. Great. Now Tulpa has added the kkk to his sock army. Have you no shame???

    5. Fuck off. Nobody wants that shit here.

  27. She’s not even a member of Trump’s legal team. Top notch reporting as always reason! And tacking on that last paragraph doesn’t make it ok.

    1. She was a part of Trump’s legal team. Rudy, Trump, and Jenna all made multiple statements that she was, until she went off the rails.

    2. This is an actual statement from Rudy at the press conference:

      “This is representative of our legal team,” Giuliani said at the event. “We’re representing President Trump and we’re representing the Trump campaign. When I finish, Sidney Powell and then Jenna Ellis will follow me.” Powell herself has been working out an office at the Trump campaign’s headquarters.

      https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-campaign-disavows-its-own-election-conspiracy-lawyer-sidney-powell

      You people are clowns.

    3. We were always at war with Eurasia.

    4. Even Rush Limbaugh believed that she was part of Trump’s legal team. Are you going to make the claim that Limbaugh is part of the deep state now, too?

      https://www.foxnews.com/politics/live-updates-election-legal-11-24-2020

      “During his radio show on Monday, Limbaugh began by knocking the legal team’s efforts to distance itself from Attorney Sidney Powell, telling his listeners “It’s a tough thing to deny that she was ever a part of it because they introduced her as part of it. I mean, she was at that press conference last week.”

      “The problem with that press conference last week, folks, it goes way beyond Sidney Powell,” Limbaugh said. “You call a gigantic press conference like that, one that lasts an hour, and you announce massive bombshells, then you better have some bombshells,” said the syndicated host who is heard on nearly 600 stations.”

  28. No shred of evidence? Just be honest. Here is a list of evidence that is just scratching the surface.
    https://thedonald.win/p/11QRfcGgP0/voter-fraud-nov-19th-6-months-of/

  29. Why did Trump lose? One word: NIGGERS. If no longer for the niggers, he could have one in a landslide. Why need to niggers, barely sentient apes, manipulate our country?

    https://www.divineleather.com/mens-10-pocket-side-lace-leather-vest-tall/

    1. Die in a grease fire.

    2. That kind of racist language and thinking is typical of Biden/Harris supporters.

    3. Have the bots been hanging out at 4chan?

  30. “Without a shred of evidence, Sidney Powell is alleging a conspiracy more vast than Russiagate. Shouldn’t that raise red flags?”

    No, why should it? We are a country of free speech and rule of law. These claims will have their day in court, where evidence may or may not be presented, and the court and public can judge the merits.

    Nothing in this should raise red flags as no one is proposing going outside the rule of law. And acting like this is somehow worthy of a ‘red flag’ is a pretty pathetic, Robby.

    1. You’re reading it wrong.

      “Without a shred of evidence, Sidney Powell is alleging a conspiracy more vast than Russiagate. Shouldn’t that raise red flags get us some ad clicks?”

      There, fixed.

  31. You lost me when when you stated :”why would Hillary” fill in illegal act here.
    Because she can.

  32. Good grief, so many people let their buttons be pushed by propagandists.

    I have no idea whether Powell is a nutty conspiracy theorist, or whether she states fact about her investigation. What matters is the outcome of the legal process. Even that may not get at the truth, but it’s what determines who will be president for better or for worse.

    When it comes to truth, election fraud isn’t even relevant, the election outcome was determined by massive propaganda and massive spending by interests, both legal and highly corrosive. Whether they needed a bit of election fraud to push Biden over the finish line doesn’t matter in comparison.

  33. She claims she has evidence and she needs to get it into court in short order. Then we find out if there is anything to her statements or is she following the Adam Schiff model promising he had proof of Russian collusion only for it never to appear. Since there is no consequences for such things this will be the political norm going forward.

  34. I like donald trump’s point of view, even though he lost, I hope he will return in 2024.
    my website:
    https://uwinfun.com

  35. risking the end of the candidate’s political aspirations and jail for all involved if apprehended

    I’m not saying that the primaries were rigged against Bernie, but no matter what, Hillary Clinton does not get “apprehended” and she certainly doesn’t go to jail.

  36. It’s important to note that Russiagate does not imply the need for such a grand conspiracy. You just need a small branch of the GRU and a couple of insiders to the Trump campaign to coordinate with them. And much of this was overt and openly known. The only link in question was the coordination part (by Stone) and the implicit debt owed. The big difference of course, is that emails were actually stolen and we know disinformation was deliberately disseminated. The only real question was how much the Trump administration knew or had to do with it.

    But the big deal about Russiagate was not even if he coordinated, but that he still denies that it even mattered. As if stolen emails even mattered? Oh really? As if sowing disinformation wasn’t a problem? Oh really? Well, we certainly reap what we sow. We are now awash in disinformation and the GOP actively creates, diseminates and celebrates it.

    1. Sure and the fabricated evidence ploy didn’t work either.

  37. It’s important to comprehend the sheer size of this alleged corruption

    We libertarians know that these politicians and their lackeys mean well despite their lack of organization and coordination.

  38. You don’t need a vast conspiracy, just a few over zealous local Democrat ballot harvesters and lax signature checking standards.

    1. More than “a few.”

  39. Trump is cutting Powell loose because he knows she is venturing very very far into slander and libel territory.

    At this point, unless Powell puts forward a court claim with supporting documents to provide reasonable basis for claims, she and possibly Trump are going would be on the hook for slander, if Dominion were to exercise their constitutional rights to sue the pants off of them. It would, however, be supremely disappointing if Dominion were to settle for money rather an vocal and repeating (like once every week for 4 years by @realDonaldTrump) of admission of malice for personal gains.

    1. Very doubtful that a lawyer of Powell’s experience would open themselves up to a defamation lawsuit.
      Perhaps she’s off the deep end.
      Perhaps she really does have something epic.

      We’ll know in a little while one way or the other.

      Although I find it curious that Dominion is acting as if they have something to hide, as have the dems/media for the last couple weeks.

      1. Yeah, that’s the thing. I certainly don’t know if the election was stolen or anything like that. But the defensiveness of the Democrats and their media friends is something. If they really don’t have anything to hide, why not say “yes, let’s investigate this thoroughly and put these rumors to rest”? Even if it is all nutzo, when 1/3 of the country thinks something is up, a proper investigation is called for. Just saying “fuck you, you’re crazy” to that large a part of the electorate is not a good move unless the alternative is likely to get you in big trouble.

        1. Any defense lawyer will tell you not to give anything away.

          It is up to the opposition to provide evidence and make a case. Thus far they have not.

      2. It’s Already been reported this is for financial reasons as she has a separate crowd funding campaign for her work and it would be subject to all kinds of campaign regulations if she was part of trumps team. So it seems they made this distinction so she can continue to pull in donations from anywhere

  40. Dominion just backed out of a PA House hearing last week.
    https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/pennsylvania/pa-lawmakers-criticizing-dominion-voting-systems-after-it-backs-out-of-hearing/article_6020da90-2ba1-11eb-8420-534f51eeb494.html

    I’ll be pleasantly shocked if/when Dominion files any slander lawsuits against anyone, as doing would give defendants far more legal opportunities to access proprietary information from Dominion.

    1. Yes discovery, they won’t sue anyone.

  41. So the secretary of state didn’t enter into an agreement to violate GA law? No evidence? Lin Wood provided a copy of the document.

    I guess if you close your eyes there is no evidence.

  42. Poor little robby. There are many “red flags” surrounding this election, but this is where he plants his flag. Pathetic.

  43. I’m guessing she still believes in Santa Claus.

  44. How in the fuck does the author no that there is no shred of evidence?

    1. Probably because Trump’s legal team won’t reveal it in court.

  45. Hey, did anyone see this press conference yet? It was so amazing and entertaining. There was old Rudy at the top of his game, sweating like a pig and dripping food coloring down the sides of his face. As usual, spouting stories of fraud that he won’t repeat in court.

    Them there was Sydney. Wow, how powerful was her speech? I was amazed by her knowledge with the dominion voting system and the knowledge that she had about Hugo Chances rigging the election against trump even though he died years ago. Those were some amazing facts. It probably the most amazing thing was that she was willing to spew all those lies in front of the entire world.

    If I was a Trump follower, I would have probably believed all of those lies. And face it, Trump voters. If you were watching the conference live, you know you were sitting in front of your tv or computer yelling YEAH, YEAH, HELL YEAH. THIS IS GONNA BE PROVED IN COURT FOR SURE. WE WIN, WE WIN, WE WIN!!!!!. Bwaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha. Well, how do you feel today believing all that bullshit.

    I think it’s time for Trump voters to just call it a day and give up. What do you all think? I’m not even a Trump voter, and I’m starting to feel embarrassed for you all. Trump and his so called legal team just look like a bunch of buffoons. Don’t you agree? Hopefully you all agree. Or you can just carry on with your buffoonery. Your choice I guess.

    1. …. I would have probably believed all of those lies ….

      Definitively: A “democrat.”

      One, that is, who was taking a spell from telling them.

      For, ‘ … it isn’t so much that the definitively-treasonous, RICO-racketeering, organized-criminal, fascist-Marxist/Leninist elections-stealing Mobsters that call themselves: “democrats;” are ignorant. It’s just that they say so many things that simply are not so.’ — Ronald Reagan. (Apologies to)

      Have a nice day.

  46. I knew this article was going to get a huge response. Tons of pissed off people disputing it, but where’s the lie? They still haven’t presented any comprehensive evidence, and essentially every legal challenge has failed so far.

  47. Sidney Powell sounds like she’s going crazy on CNN these days.

    But let’s say while Sidney going cray-cray up on the lectern a blue beam suddenly shines down, and up Sidney goes into the UFO – which then quickly departs.

    Remember while you’re watching CNN that CNN would edit the last part out.

  48. Lost me at: “Without a shred of evidence.”

Please to post comments