Election 2020

The Attorney General Says He Hasn't Seen Any Evidence of Fraud That Could Have Changed the Outcome of the Election

Rudy Giuliani is unfazed.


In a TV interview on Sunday, Donald Trump complained that the Justice Department and the FBI have not taken his wild claims of massive election fraud seriously enough. He speculated that "maybe they're involved" in the vast conspiracy to deny him his rightful victory. Today Attorney General William Barr confirmed Trump's suspicion.

"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr told the Associated Press. Alluding to claims by the president, former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell, and current Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, Barr added: "There's been one assertion that would be systemic fraud, and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far we haven't seen anything to substantiate that."

According to Barr, the Justice Department has investigated various election fraud claims but has not found anything like the contest-flipping chicanery alleged by Trump, Giuliani, and Powell. "Most claims of fraud are very particularized to a particular set of circumstances or actors or conduct," he said. "They are not systemic allegations. And those have been run down; they are being run down. Some have been broad and potentially cover a few thousand votes. They have been followed up on."

The Trump campaign was unfazed by that assessment from the nation's top law enforcement official, who has heretofore been a vigorous defender of the president. "With all due respect to the Attorney General, there hasn't been any semblance of a Department of Justice investigation," Giuliani said in a press release from the campaign. "We have gathered ample evidence of illegal voting in at least six states, which they have not examined. We have many witnesses swearing under oath they saw crimes being committed in connection with voter fraud. As far as we know, not a single one has been interviewed by the DOJ. The Justice Department also hasn't audited any voting machines or used their subpoena powers to determine the truth."

For a sense of what the affidavits cited by Giuliani actually show, here is a sampling of the dubious evidence on which he is relying. Giuliani promised that "we will continue our pursuit of the truth through the judicial system and state legislatures, and continue toward the Constitution's mandate and ensuring that every legal vote is counted and every illegal vote is not."

NEXT: The Head of D.C.'s Long-Troubled Metro System Says Another Federal Bailout Is Needed To Stave Off Apocalyptic Service Cuts

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “TO DATE” and “ON A SCALE”
    The master of weasel words – – – – – – – –

    1. Sullum gets paid to prevaricate by word count, apparently. This is his forth DNC propaganda column this week and it’s only Tuesday.

      They’re working him hard on this narrative.

      1. Who did you vote for?

        Oh, that’s right. You are a Canadian hyper-Republican partisan. That’s just really weird.

        1. Mother’s Lament is really weird… It is half moose! It’s the result of inbreeding between moose and humans for many generations, is what it is!

          1. A moose man. Cool.

            1. Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regulaer office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
              on this page…..work92/7 online

            2. Start making money this time. Spend more time with your family & relative by doing jobs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $63o to $70o a month. I’ve started this job and earn handsome income and now I am exchange it with you, so you can do it too. You can check it out here… USA ONLINE JOBS

      2. Reason just unleashed a great white website shark, so why can’t Trump find a bigger Kraken ?


        1. I’am made $84, 8254 so far this year working on the web and I’m a full time understudy. Im going utilizing an online business opportunity I caught wind of and I’AM profited. It’s truly easy to understand and I’m simply so cheerful that I got some answers concerning it. Here what I do,.more data essentially open this connection thank you……. EASY ONLINE EARNING

    2. “On a scale” — you do understand there are margins of votes that have to be overturned to change who won. That is why “on a scale” is referring to actual mathematical realities, not just the use of “weasel words”.

      1. Google pays for every Person every hour online working from home job. I have received $23K in this month easily and I earns every weeks $5K to 8$K on the internet. Afg Every Person join this working easily by just just open this website and follow instructions………….. Visit Here

    3. Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have qlo earned $28775 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do …….. Visit Here

  2. So…. we shouldn’t investigate for fraud at all unless it can change the election? We should ignore all the red flags because a cursory review says they won’t change enough votes? We should ignore the constitutional (state) lawsuits going on?

    Totes libertarian.

    1. I’ll wait to see the chosen narrative on the just announced special prosecutor investigation.

      1. Jesse, they got to Barr!! THEY GOT TO BARR!

        The deep state is everywhere!

        1. Or Sullum is twisting the same fuck out of Barr’s statement. Shall we check?

          1. Go for it.

            1. Don’t waste your time. Trump will fire Barr tomorrow anyway!

              1. I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. Without a doubt, this is the easiest and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had.MJh I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally changed my life.

                for more details visit this link… Home Profit System

      2. Barr did it to prevent Trump from declassifying any information about Crossfire Hurricane. Barr has shown himself to be nothing but another swamp rat.

    2. “we shouldn’t investigate for fraud at all unless it can change the election?”

      That is actually the standard excuse so-called “judges” use in dismissing voter fraud cases in the past. The primary job of a “judge” is to avoid doing their job. Some of the laziest lawyers in the country are judges.

      1. What do you call a lawyer with a 2-digit IQ?

        “Your Honor.”

        1. Actually, judges are the smartest lawyers. It goes, you get As in law school, you become a judge. You get Bs in law school, you become a law school professor. You get Cs in law school, you become a lawyer.

          1. Yeah the best at cheating in school. That explains a lot, actually.

      2. I just watched a judge up here get pissy that the plaintiffs submitted 100 pages of evidence in their defense.
        He never read any of it and ruled against them even though it was obvious it was a garbage suit.

        1. Fuckin’ Judge Judy. She’s awful

        2. Relevance?

          1. Just a recent anecdote regarding shitty judges. No relevance to the US election, nor did I claim there was.

            Now fuck off. Go masturbate to Jesse again or something.

            1. So, if there was no relevance to the election, why say it at all?

      3. When you sue someone, you propose a remedy. The judge says you can’t have the remedy even if you win the law suite. Thus the lawsuit is moot.
        So if you propose to throwout 6 million votes because 4 people didn’t get equal protection, you may be disappointed.
        Of course if you propose to drop 6 million votes because poll workers rolled their eyes, you may get Rule 11 sanctions on top of dismissal.

    3. They investigated for 3 weeks.

    4. Clearly you didn’t read the actual statements Barr made given that he said they are investigating fraud and that, of those investigations that have completed so far, there is no evidence of widespread fraud on the scale alleged by Trump. But even so, they are still investigating some of the allegations. No where in there is “we shouldn’t investigate for fraud at all…” you’ve made that up.

      We know there was fraud on a small scale, which Barr admits. We know that fraud has been committed both to favor Trump and to favor Biden. (see the Florida spoiler campaign for an example of a pro-Trump case of election fraud.)

      So no, don’t ignore the lawsuits. Just be aware that no matter how hard Republicans wanted to hold on to the Whitehouse, they lost in a fair election just as they won in a fair election in 2016.

    5. Nobody has said that.

    6. If a person lies IRS about their income and pays fewer taxes it won’t make a bit of difference to the countries debt or deficit so why go after tax cheats. Why have laws at all since it doesn’t seem to matter at all

    7. It used to be “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”. Nowadays, it’s more like “where there’s smoke, we won’t risk discovering there’s more to it”.

      1. And yet, while you say that, “firemen” are searching the “building” looking for the fire. But it appears to them that someone raised a false alarm and the smoke doesn’t exist at all.

  3. Reason is supported by:


    1. Charles’s…

    2. Cats… Candles… Cookies…


      1. Chlamydia… cholera… cancer…

  4. Trump needs to fire Barr immediately for gross insubordination.

    1. After all his very job definition is to back up Trump in all matters!

      1. He pretty much did. Jacob has twisted the inference so badly that it’s almost backwards.

        But shills gotta shill. You of all people should know that.

    2. Or maybe not – – –


      “The move better insulates Durham from being relieved of his duties under an incoming administration led by former Vice President Joe Biden, who appeared to play a pivotal role in weaponizing the intelligence community to launch a deep-state coup on President Donald Trump days before leaving office in 2017.”

    3. You do realize that Attorney General is supposed to be America’s attorney not tRump’s? He is literally not supposed to be subordinate to him.

      1. Look where that attitude got Jeff Sessions.

  5. *starts some Jiffy Pop*

  6. Barr just needs to ask LC, jesse, nardtz and the other brain-dead idiots around here. They have plenty of evidence for him.

  7. I get my news from CNN and their investigative evidence is beyond reproach.

    1. While I know this was meant as dripping sarcasm, it comes across pretty flat since CNN’s reporting on this has been fairly accurate so far.
      Large, organized, election fraud of the sort, which would cross multiple states and take different forms as required, would involve so many people that the sort of conspiracy needed to pull it off is extraordinarily difficult. Not one of these conspiracists appears to have been poorly chosen. Not one made a mistake. The conspiracy was so well managed that there isn’t even a pattern or any notable trend to point to.

      So either that is true or it was a fair election and Trump simply lost. Which if these is more likely?

      1. You are rather naive. Conspiracies do not require coordination. Everybody on the ground knows we need to cheat. Everybody on the ground pursues different approaches based on the unique circumstances in their districts.

        Much of this was laid out in Jimmy Carter’s report on voter integrity. It’s just that each local swamp creature borrowed from his well-researched playbook ON THEIR OWN.

        Where you have Democrats, you will have natural and organic cheating. It’s just who they are.

        1. Ignoring your argument in bad faith…

          You’re still making the claim that these naturally cheating Democrats are so intelligent and skillful that they can *all*, to a person, cheat on a scale of 10’s of thousands of votes in key counties in multiple states amounting to several million more votes than even Hillary got, without leaving a trace or making a single mistake or confiding in one person who would blow the whistle.

          I mean, clearly, the Democrats are so much smarter than the Republicans and deserved to win, right?

          Except for the fact that they totally forgot to rig the Senate race too! Oops. Their one mistake in this grand scheme was only helping Biden but no other Democrat. Curses! Foiled again!

        2. It’s well documented that humans are averse to cognitive dissonance.

          So is it not possible that your beliefs are simply the result of your brain rejecting the reality that Trump’s dick has been in your mouth for 4+ years?

  8. https://twitter.com/montaga/status/1333900044920102912?s=19

    Fact: The FBI investigated a sitting Pres. using a fabricated dossier paid for by the DNC. But hundreds of affidavits plus witness testimony plus detailed forensic evidence in front of 3 State Senate panels are considered zero evidence of election fraud. This will not end well.

    1. …for you maybe.

    2. Number of affidavits does not mean anything. Those have been looked at and they are very weak. Also there is no forensic evidence. If there was anything to any of these cases, at lease one of the Republican judges would not have dismissed the case.

      1. We’ve already seen some affidavits turn out to be false.

        1. This is to be expect. Some people will make mistakes or there will be misunderstandings. Some will deliberately make stuff up. It’s doubtful this would be every affidavit, though.

          1. Depends. If I offer people a million bucks to send in evidence, I’m given the vast majority of them an incentive to lie.

            While I think all credible claims should be investigated and all false alarms prosecuted, the whole thing looks like an attempt at a real-world denial-of-service attack on the election system.

    3. And like clockwork Tony’s socks D’Ohpressor and MollyGodawful show up and shit on the forum.

      The reason Koch betrayal continues unabated.

      1. I am just trying to refute the stupid lies that others write.

        1. Except nothing I quoted is a lie. At all.

          1. It wouldn’t matter if it was. It’s not about how someone wins but who. I couldn’t give a shit if it turned out Biden won clean; overturning his win would be the best thing that could happen to this country right now.

            Fuck fairness. Fairness got us the left. Time to take the gloves off.

            1. You realize this is a libertarian website right?

              Anyways, you must have been the “fun” sibling during a game of Monopoly.

    4. Technically the dossier was not fabricated. In the intelligence business you report everything, even the lies, and sort it out later. You never want to be caught say “Oh that, I thought it was BS so I left it out.”
      BTW, that makes two independent reports that tRump’s has a urination fetish. “Kompromat” much?

      Hundreds of affidavits that read “I saw election officials roll their eyes when they saw a tRump ballot” is not evidence of fraud.
      You need something like I saw them throw out 100,000 tRump ballots and replace them with Biden ones. (with an army of monkeys filling in the circles. With 1000 people, it would probably take 1/2 hour or more.) Of course that is assuming that 100,000 tRump ballots even made it through a counting area controlled by Democrats.

      BTW, a hotel conference room filled with invited Republican is not a “State Senate panel”

      1. The bar is much higher to prove in court. This does not mean something did not happen, only that it can’t be proven to the degree required in a court of law.

        One characteristic of cheating in general, is that those who cheat recognize the risk of getting caught and tend to avoid cheating if that risk is perceived as too great. If you lower the risk of consequences, you’ll get more cheating.

        1. The great thing about that principle is that it applies to pretty much all of life, like tax, charities, foundations, elections, etc. But that’s politics for you; one person’s cheating is totally cool if they’re doing it to win for your team, right? We’ve just gone through 5 years of that garbage but now, now we need to investigate every minor detail until the very last moment so that, maybe, a state legislature will perceive enough political cover to burn all the ballots and appoint the president they want because the voters cannot be trusted.

  9. Wow Jacob. I have to say I’ve been impressed that you’ve managed to vomit up an election fraud hoax piece every day for a couple of weeks. But two in one day? Bravo sir. Bravo!

  10. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-ballots-defaulted-and-switched-biden-dominion-system-maricopa-gop-chairwoman

    Maricopa County GOP chairwoman Linda Brickman on Nov. 30 testified before members of the Arizona State Legislature that she personally observed votes for President Donald Trump being tallied as votes for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden when input into Dominion machines.
    Brickman, the GOP head of one of the country’s largest counties and a veteran county elections worker, submitted her testimony in a sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury. She testified that she and her Democratic partner witnessed “more than once” Trump votes default and shift to Biden when they were entering votes into Dominion machines from ballots that couldn’t be read by machines.
    She alleged that she was later threatened by election supervisors at the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center (MCTEC) for speaking out about what she had witnessed.
    “I observed, with my Democratic partner, the preparation of a new ballot, since the original one was soiled, or wouldn’t go through the tabulators. I read her a Trump Republican ballot, and as soon as she entered it into the system, the ballot defaulted on the screen to a Biden Democratic ballot,” Brickman told GOP Arizona State legislators on Monday.
    She remarked that when she reported the issue to election supervisors, others in the room also commented that they had “witnessed the same manipulation.”
    “We were never told what, if any corrective action was taken,” Brickman continued. “All I know is the next day, I was called outside the room that I was working in for signature verification by a supervisor who said, ‘I understand you caused some problems this week and you thought our machines were not working correctly.’
    “I was told at that point in time that I could not discuss anything or talk about what was going on.
    “Many people were threatened,” Brickman told the hearing. “They were told that their voices would be suppressed, they would have to leave the room and not work there again. I’m here because I think this is our duty to speak the truth.”
    She told the hearing that she was yelled at and “reprimanded” by her own supervisor, who accused her of causing trouble and “bringing things up that I shouldn’t have.”
    She also said that during testing and certification of the Dominion voting machines on Nov. 18, she had refused to approve the certification of the Dominion system during a meeting with Secretary of State Katie Hobbs because the machines had malfunctioned during the test, and were shut down and reset by Dominion staff instead of corrected.
    She said that no explanation was given about the errors. “We could see the machines but we could not see or observe the software behind the machine to confirm what had really gone on,” she added.
    Trump’s legal team had previously pointed to witness testimony alleging that election results from Dominion Voting Systems are susceptible to manipulation—an allegation that the company has repeatedly denied.
    Writing for The Wall Street Journal in a piece published this week, Dominion CEO John Poulos said recent claims against the company “fueled the harassment of election officials and Dominion employees across the country,” including death threats.
    “The lies and smears have no basis in fact but they do real damage to our democracy by casting doubt on the legitimacy of the electoral process. The false allegations should be retracted immediately,” he said.
    Dominion has not responded yet to a request from The Epoch Times for comment.

    1. Brickman in the hearing also testified to a number of other voting irregularities that she directly observed, including the constant lowering of signature verification standards by her election supervisors in order to “move more quickly” and process the higher amount of early and mail-in ballots received for the November election.
      “Standards were lowered from approximately 15 points of similarities … reduced to a minimum of three, and then lowered to one, and ultimately none,” Brickman said, recalling that she was told to “just pass each signature verification through.”
      “We were told, ‘Too many rejections have already been turned in … we need to move more quickly.’ This is not the way an election should be run. Where’s the integrity?” Brickman challenged.
      The GOP chairwoman also said she observed signatures on envelopes that were completely different from the name of the listed voter being let through by election supervisors.
      “So the ones who signed the envelopes were not the actual voters, but these were allowed to go through with ‘Maricopa County verified’ stamped on the outside of each affidavit envelope,” she said.
      Batches of envelopes bearing the same handwriting for different signatures were also observed, she said.
      “There were at least 30 ballots that I saw at one time, that were signed by the same handwriting but on different voters’ names,” Brickman testified. “When I asked if the county attorney would be alerted for possible fraud, I was told ‘no,’ that supervisors would take care of it.”
      One of the most “egregious” irregularities, Brickman said, was the turning away of Trump votes as duplicated votes or “overvotes” because the voter filled checked both the bubble for Trump on the ballot but also wrote in the president’s name under the write-in candidate.
      “This would continue on as an overvote, which means no vote was counted at all despite the policy having been changed to allow these overvotes. Supervisors contradicted their own policies where the [voter’s] intent was clear,” she said.
      “I am here today again not as an expert in the Dominion software but as a voter in Maricopa County who wants to hear and speak the truth even though myself and others have been suppressed to speak before you now,” Brickman told the hearing.
      “There should be integrity,” she said.

      1. Hey Bill Barr! This ^ is the dude I was tellin you about. He’s got a ton of evidence for you to investigate. Get Kracken’n!

        1. Be fair. Those are serious allegations and they deserve to be fully investigated.

          1. I’ll leave that to you. I’m just here for the lolz

            1. Fuck off Tulpa

              1. thanks. Lolz

            2. Be honest, you’re only here for the ass eating.

      2. “Hearing”, you say. So, this was a hearing held by the Arizona legislature in a government building, with witnesses from both sides, and all sworn in, right?

        1. Tell us about how Flynn should be rotting in jail because the FBI and Nany Pelosi said he lied

          1. Also, you assholes demand evidence and then, after your asshole judges won’t allow their evidence to be shown in court, they hold hearings to air the evidence. And you dismiss it without even listening to it.

            Gee, I wonder why everyone thinks you’re full of shit.

            1. Evidence:


              “COURT NEWS: Former Trump attorney Sidney Powell has filed a federal lawsuit seeking to have @realDonaldTrump declared winner of Wisconsin’s electoral votes.

              “Among other things, suit seeks 48 hours of security footage from the TCF Center from Nov. 3-4.

              “TCF Center is in Detroit.”

            2. “Evidence” has a legal meaning. It has to meet certain minimum standards and “hearsay” isn’t one of them.

              “Yer honors, he looked shifty-eyed and untrustworthy!”

              A number of people making claims changed their tune when faced with a sworn oath and the possibility of perjuring themselves and facing jail time.

          2. Relevance?

      3. Well, that was a lot of evidence from a couple of very credible news sources. Here is a video from yet another very credible news sources. Although She was deemed not credible. Or maybe our whole court system in this country is a fraud too? But it is very entertaining watching this stuff.

    2. So, a quick round of Googling provides some missing context in your story.

      1) The Libertarian and GOP representatives invited to the pre-election check of the voting machines never showed. The Democrats did, however.
      2) The hand recount rules in AZ were changed by the Republican majority from precincts to centralized voting which created problems when the GOP wanted to only recount votes in heavily Democratic districts.
      3) The “evidence” provided regarding fraud was done at an unofficial hearing where the people giving testimony were not doing so under oath.
      4) In several counties, the post-election hand recounts weren’t attended by GOP and/or Libertarian representatives. [Apache, Gila, Graham, La Paz, and Yuma counties]
      5) The Maricopa county hand recount (2% of in-person and 1% of early voting) which was attended by Democrat, Libertarian, and Republican representatives, showed a 100% match across 8,200 votes.
      6) This: https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3Acf516be6-3230-4953-92a2-95ec72050d3a#pageNum=1

      1. Nardz, I expect you to respond to this before you vomit anything else up from twitter around here.

        1. I don’t really give a damn what you expect, you’re an enemy of this nation and habitual liar, as is shawn.
          You leftists have breached all levels of trust.

          1. Time for your nap.

            1. You know if you tried dieting and exercise, you wouldn’t be so morbidly obese that you live in fear of a moderate respiratory virus.

              1. I can lose weight.
                You can’t lose crazy.

                1. You can try, maybe get on some meds and see a specialist. Don’t sell yourself so short man.

          2. I dunno about “enemy” but I *am* a veteran.


            1. I couldn’t give a shit if you were fighting commies with an American flag tattooed on your chest. You’re here arguing this election is clean, that makes you an enemy of America.

              Trying to prove this election is clean is not the act of a patriot.

              1. This here might be the one comment that most perfectly crtystallizes the level of insane. NOTHING is good enough for these people except absolute unquestioned fealty to Trump. This is why soon even Breitbart won’t be “true enough” for them, they must continually move to newer, even more rabidly pro-Trump sources. In their minds, EVERYONE not named Donald Trump is “in on it” even Trump-appointed judges.

                You literally need mental help.

                1. I don’t see how. I don’t vote left.

      2. The link for #6 does not really show anything apart from a summary of the recount results. If you were able to provide a link here, though, why no links for the other assertions?

        1. Because it’s a waste of my time here. Bottom line. Everyone here should be doing a minimum amount of fact checking before posting alternative “facts” but most don’t. It took me less than 15 minutes to pull that together. The last link was just raw data and it’s easier to post the link than quote everything found there.

          In the face of all the information to the contrary, a surprisingly large number of people still believe the election was swayed to Biden by massive, distributed, expertly executed, fraud. Occam’s Razor be damned.

          1. Occam’s Razor is just intellectual trickery. You know god damn well this election was stolen.

            But your happy that it was stolen for the “right” people so it’s in your interest to pretend to yourself and everyone else that this election was clean.

            You’re a god damned traitor. You and every idiot who voted for Biden and JoJo should be shot as such. It’s the least you deserve for hating America.

            1. “Only liberals are gay. It is not possible for I to have had the cock of a lying corrupt dumb fuck in my mouth for 4+ years. It is not possible for I, a defender of liberty, to become the one thing I swore to fight.”

              -Top Genius and MENSA member:
              Mark Question

              But for real, you’re the branch that needs to be pruned off the liberty tree.

  11. Yes I am sure the DOJ looked all over their DC office for evidence. Much like their investigation looked into who pimped the Russian collusion story and why nobody got prosecuted for lying to congress or fabricating evidence.

    The fix is in. You are a DC insider with Ivy League credentials or you are an oligarch who funds them. Everyone else is a slave.

  12. In today’s AM links Nardz asked that I “Show [him] the consistency”, which he clarified to mean “Do ratio of mail ins in PA [to] Other states, national average. Show us it’s not a massive outlier.”

    Here are the results of that (slightly expanded) analysis.

    tl;dr: PA mail in ballot numbers seem very consistent with other states.

    All data is available for checking here:

    First I’ll look at voter turnout data (follow links on that page to a spreadsheet if you want to follow along). I’ll then turn to mail in ballots.

    First, the mean voter turnout (what they label as VEP Turnout Rate, which is the ratio of people who cast ballots to the eligible voting population, or VEP) is 67.7% and the standard deviation across states is 5.8 percentage points. In PA the turnout was 71%, less than one standard deviation from the mean. Conclusion: PA is consistent with other states.

    Now let’s look at the fraction of all ballots that voted for the highest office. I get this by dividing “Vote for Highest Office (President)” by “Total Ballots Counted (Estimate)”. Note that these numbers are not available for every state. The mean is 99.07% and the standard deviation is 0.75 percentage points. In PA it was 98.62%, less than one standard deviation from the mean. Conclusion: PA is consistent with other states.

    1. Now lets look at early vote statistics. This is provided by the same United States Elections Project. Data is available here, though it doesn’t seem to be in as convenient a format.

      I went through each state for which they provide data and transcribed it into a spreadsheet on my own. Feel free to do the same to check my analysis (I would actually appreciate someone doing this to make sure I didn’t make a transcription error). Note that I am taking the eligible voter population (VEP) from the other spreadsheet referenced above.

      Some caveats up front. Different states report differently, so this is not quite an apples to apples comparison. For example, Minnesota does not differentiate between mail-in ballots and early in-person ballots in their reporting, so the website I am getting data from combines those numbers. Another example: Louisiana, Tennessee, and Texas don’t report requested mail-in ballots, just total returned (RED STATE CONSPIRACY?? — I’m joking, I’m joking). Nevertheless, I am leaving out Louisiana, Tennessee, and Texas from the results reported below. Another: The numbers from Idaho are only from its most populous county. Also, not all Ohio counties report vote by type, so I am also leaving Ohio out of the results reported below (otherwise it combines in-person and mail-in voting). There are others you can read about at that website. I am acknowledging these limitations of the data up front in order to be transparent. With those caveats in mind, I will do the best I can with the data in hand.

      First let’s look at the number of requested mail-in ballots as a percentage of VEP. First thing to note is that there is quite a large spread. Only 5.97% of eligible voters in Arkansas requested a mail in ballot (the lowest of any state), while in New Jersey 98.3% requested ballots. That stood out to me, and it turns out that NJ sent mail-in ballots to all registered voters, so “requested” really isn’t the right term to use here. Colorado seems to do something similar, and I know a few other states did as well. Even considering that, the request rate was still pretty all over the place. Having said that, the mean request rate was 41.88% and the standard deviation was 28.04 percentage points (but, again, that is being influenced a lot lot lot by outliers). How about PA? Request rate was 31.56%, well within one standard deviation. Concerned about the outliers throwing things off? The median was 32.55%. Conclusion: PA is consistent with other states.

      Now let’s look at the number of ballots returned as a percentage of ballots requested. This is much more consistent, though not without some outliers. Only 32.76% of requested ballots were returned in Nevada. But most were in excess of 60%. The mean is 79.06% with a standard deviation of 14.71 percentage points. The median was 82.98%. PA was 85.17%, well within one standard deviation of the mean and very close to the median. Conclusion: PA is consistent with other states.

      Now, on to rejection rates. I am reporting the number of rejected mail in ballots as a percentage of the total of accepted and rejected mail in ballots. Unfortunately only five states have rejection numbers on that website. That makes this analysis susceptible to small-number variations. But, for what it’s worth, here are the numbers:

      Georgia: 0.203%
      Iowa: 0.147%
      Michigan: 0.065%
      North Carolina: 0.808%
      Pennsylvania: 0.281%

      With such few states, mean and standard deviation are not particularly helpful, but if you are interested the mean is 0.3% and the standard deviation is 0.29 percentage points. What we can say is that PA has the second highest rejection rate behind North Carolina. Iowa is lower than all but Michigan, and Iowa (and North Carolina) went for Trump. Maybe with more time we’ll get results from more states and we can do a more robust comparison. Or, if you have a different source, please let me know. But so far, PA is not looking particularly inconsistent.

      We can also compare these rates to 2018. The following numbers for 2018 come from Ballotpedia. I report only the states reported above. The numbers in parentheses are the ratio of 2018 rejection rates to 2020 rejection rates.

      Georgia: 3.1% (15.3)
      Iowa: 1.6% (10.9)
      Michigan: 0.6% (9.2)
      North Carolina: 6.1% (7.5)
      Pennsylvania: 4.4% (15.6)

      Some observations: rejection rates were higher across the board in 2018 by between 7.5 and 15.6 times. The mean ratio between 2018 and 2020 is 11.7 and the standard deviation is 3.2. PA had the biggest drop in rejection rate between 2018 and 2020, but it is only 1.2 standard deviations from the mean. Again, these are small numbers, so I wouldn’t read too much into it, but a 1.2 standard deviation difference is not generally considered significant.

      Conclusion: Need more data, but the data we do have in hand doesn’t make PA look like that much of an outlier. I would call this consistent.

      What is inconsistent is the low rejection rate compared to 2018, but this is true for all the states I have data for, including two states that Trump won.

      So, is the drop in rejection rates in and of itself suspicious? Again, without more data, it’s tough to be definitive, but at this point I lean towards no. I will admit my priors are playing a role here, but consider that there was a major get-out-the-mail-in-vote effort this year, particularly from Democrats. I think it’s reasonable to assume that voters were better educated about how to properly complete their mail in ballots. And I also suspect that if you look at other characteristics, the population of mail in voters in 2020 will look a lot different than the population of mail in voters in 2018, so it’s not really an apples to apples comparison.

      Overall conclusion: PA mail in ballot numbers seem very consistent with other states.

      As always, I’m happy to accept constructive criticisms and to be pointed to additional data.


      (PS: I’ll post this again in tomorrow’s AM links so that more people may see it)

      1. You again ignore what was originally asked, so let’s draw it in crayon: state by state ratio/margin of mail in votes by candidate

        1. “But Trump told his voters to vote in person!”
          doesn’t explain PA having a Biden +60% margin and MI going Biden +40% on mail in votes vs Trump when the next highest is Ohio=Biden +15%, and most states (ex: FL=Biden +4%) have a margin in single digits.
          If I’m wrong about that data, please point me to your source (your link doesn’t have it).

          1. What is the source for your numbers?

            1. Hey look everyone Jeff is doing that pathetic thing where he has already dismissed the source with an ad hominem and is simply waiting for a reply to post it.

              ……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
              ……….”…\………. _.·´

              1. Very classy. NOT.

              2. So….your smart enough to make an ascii ‘fuck you’ but too stupid to know what ‘ad hominem’ means. *scratches head*

                1. Try to read for comprehension if you’re gonna bitch at me Jeff

                  “dismissed the source with an ad hominem and is simply waiting for a reply to post it.

                  Oops! You look stupid as fuck now.

                  1. Man this is so great, you thought you had something Jeff only to be betrayed by your own intellect.

                    You’re so fucking stupid and lazy that you couldn’t even read the entire post and now you look like your parents are related three different ways!

                    1. Hey look that shut you the fuck up!

                    2. Lolzzz for days. Tulpa the clown gettin ready to dance for us all! Dance boy, Dance! Ready …..set……….

                    3. Fuck off Tulpa

                    4. “So….your smart enough”


                    5. It’s Tulpa. Just tell him to fuck off.

                    6. Fuck off Tulpa

                    7. Fuck off Tulpa.

                    8. “So….your smart enough”


                    9. Also Fuck off Tulpa.

          2. Different states emphasized mail in voting differently.
            Ohio sent every registered voter an application for mail-in voting. PA did not (although in PA, its legal for someone else to request an application for a mail in – and as I understood it, the Democratic party requested one for every registered Democrat).
            So in Ohio everyone got an application, in PA, every Democrat got one.

        2. You don’t come in here for the hunting, do you? How many new assholes has he torn you so far? At least three.

          1. You have the intellect of a gnat, eunuch, and your life doesn’t matter.

          2. Ah, ok it’s you running a sock.

      2. DC…A couple of points.

        The rejection rate really should be evaluated on a historical basis. Meaning, the last 6-10 elections. And as you say, that does have to be looked into. Note that the examples you cited could easily change the election result.

        The data for ballots requested is a total hash. With a std dev that big, ~30-points either way from a 40-point mean, you cannot say anything about consistency. So I disagree with you on that.

        We will not have answers by December 14th to these questions. I suspect it may be a few years before we can really say one way or another. I do think there should be a forensic analysis so we can know with certainty one way or the other.

        1. Historical basis may not say much given the pandemic and how it altered voting behavior and how the politicization of the pandemic meant that voting by mail changed dramatically for one party over another.

          Just as I wouldn’t be surprised to find that a large number of new voters popped up in 2016 because Trump’s message resonated in ways no other politician had for certain voters in a long time prior.

          These things happen. Historically, a bunch of white nationalists registering and voting in large numbers is probably rare but in 2016 it mattered a great deal. Historically, presidents manage their affairs with a certain amount of tradition and decorum. Since Jan 20 2017, we’ve had a president that isn’t afraid to say wildly controversial things and piss off large numbers of his own supporters. So it comes as no surprise that downballot Republicans did well but the president did not.

          I don’t know that the average trends for mail-in votes over the last handful of major elections is going to be very informative here. The claims of fraud with these votes are easy enough to cross reference regarding deaths and relocations. Getting 140,000 fraudulent (dead or not a resident/citizen) mail in ballots would be quickly spotted in a single state with some rudimentary auditing.

          IMHO, the biggest fraud in this election is Trump’s use of a “fraudulent election” hoax as a means to generate donations to pay off his debts and set himself up for whatever he does next. It’s a scam that is eating away at our democratic (small ‘d’) foundations and threatening the country as a whole. A month after the election there is still zero evidence of any fraud of any consequence. If you want historical basis, Trump’s claims of fraud in the 2016 elections were investigated and found nothing and so far that is repeating this election as well.

  13. But c’mon Mr. Sullum.
    Team Red has thrown SO much sand in the air in an attempt to create so much doubt about the legitimacy of the election. Why just look at the huge stack of affidavits. Why just look at where Dominion software was used – VENEZUELA!!!! Why just look at all of these statistics and statistics. Given all of this, don’t you think it’s worth investigating at all? I mean just look at that huge cloud of sand in the air!

    1. I too see no reason to investigate after my preferred candidate has won!

      1. First, I voted for Jo Jo.

        Second, investigate all you want. But have your investigations grounded in reality and facts. Not on hearsay and bullshit statistics.

        Third, give up on the idea that there was MASSIVE FRAUD. There wasn’t.

        Look for ways to reform the system so that incremental improvements happen with the next election.

        1. I too tell people I voted for Jo!

          1. I believe him. He’s idiotic enough.

        2. I voted for Jo too. She was far and away the best candidate. Sad she didn’t win, but oh well.
          Amazing how bad of losers these Trumpsters are, they could learn a thing or two from Jo on HOW TO LOSE WITH DIGNITY.
          Hell, Hillary even conceded on election night. Sure she whined like fisher cat for a couple days but it’s nothing compared to the whining all the Trump-tards have been doing. Irony much?
          It’s pretty amazing actually. I sit at home and just have to laugh at all these bozos.

          1. Lose with dignity? We MUST uphold and protect the integrity of the electoral process by making your lives a living hell. That is the righteous judgement and punishment you vile swamp creatures deserve. YOU HAVE SHATTERED TRUST IN EVERY ONE OF OUR INSTITUTIONS OVER THE YEARS!

            Nothing you say will be trusted. No election results will be believed. Cheating will be expected (and when YOUR precedent comes around to bite you, I’m going to laugh).

    2. What makes you think this has not been investigated? It has been almost a month, and many very partisan people were in a position to investigate.

      1. Oh I know. I was being sarcastic.

        1. Don’t worry, some people just don’t understand sarcasm these days. I understood, it was very funny :^P

      2. Everybody who’s squealing “don’t look!” about all attempts to investigate.

        You’re probably going to get away with it because everyone in power and a quarter of the people in this country are corrupt beyond repair, but the result of that will be either totalitarianism or civil war.
        Enjoy your life while you have it.

        1. “De Oppresso Liber
          November.4.2020 at 2:09 pm
          Counting votes is now “totalitarian”. Shame on you. Take a civics course and an American history course.”


          1. Yea, those Soviet elections totes means it wasn’t totalitarian.
            Good call.

            “We put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”
            -Joe Biden

            1. De Oppresso Liber
              November.4.2020 at 2:09 pm
              Counting votes is now “totalitarian”. Shame on you. Take a civics course and an American history course.”


            2. “The posts isolate a clip from Biden’s Oct. 24 appearance on the progressive podcast “Pod Save America.” In the video clip shared in the viral posts, Biden says, “Secondly, we’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration — President Obama’s administration before this — we have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” refering to an anti-voter fraud”

              But if we are going to use fake memes:
              “Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers’
              The president has repeatedly disparaged the intelligence of service members, and asked that wounded veterans be kept out of military parades, multiple sources tell The Atlantic.”

              “If I were to run, I’d run as a Republican. They’re the dumbest group of voters in the country. They believe anything on Fox News. I could lie and they’d still eat it up. I bet my numbers would be terrific.”

            3. I think you missed the part about how the Justice Department is run by a Trump toady and Trump is still the president and can organize any amount of investigation he feels he needs to get the job done. Arizona and Georgia are still red states run by Republicans who voted for Republicans and control how elections are handled and recounts managed and can allocate all the resources at their disposal to investigate. And they are, Blanch, they are. Lots of investigations going on in every red and purple state that voted for Biden but has a GOP leadership. And they’re all coming up with nothing.

              Lack of evidence of a conspiracy isn’t proof of a conspiracy. It’s proof that there will always be a need for psychologists and the registration of firearms.

        2. “but the result of that will be either totalitarianism or civil war.”

          I sure hope you and your little friends are the first to start the civil war. It will be entertaining to watch the full force of the US military squash you like the insignificant insects you are.

          1. “So….your smart enough”


          2. The last civil war we made the mistake of letting the Confederates dictate some policy and carve out some anti-democratic provisions to ensure the South held outsized power to its population and economy. If there is another civil war, I hope we learn from this lesson.

      3. I thought investigations took at least three years. What gives?

  14. Ok to all the Trump sycophants, here’s the deal. There was literally no voter fraud that was detectable. Trump’s own people say so now. The jig is up, it’s time to move on, plain and simple.
    I have nothing against Trump supporters, other than the fact that they’re low IQ clowns hellbent on destroying this country, but it’s really time to give it up.
    I’m not thrilled about Biden. I voted for Jo and hoped by some miracle (not like a fake christian miracle, but a scientific one) she could pull it off but didn’t get my hopes up. I’m an adult and I’ve taken the loss in stride. It’s time for all you would-be adults to do the same thing. Put on your big-boy pants, change your undies and face the music.

    1. There was literally no voter fraud that was detectable

      Consider me reassured.

      1. How is fraud defined? An obvious way would be more ballots than voters, but that doesn’t seem to be the case in any of these states. Dead people voting? Can happen if someone sends in an absentee ballot or votes early then croaks, but would need several thousand voters to drop dead this way in each state, not likely either.

        1. “An obvious way would be more ballots than voters, but that doesn’t seem to be the case in any of these states. ”

          Based on…your head being comfortably buried in the sand?

          1. Based on your lack of alternative theories grounded in reality.

            If you have a theory that can be proven or disproven, lay it out. So far, numerous theories have been suggested, reviewed, investigated, and found empty. This is your moment; provide the winning theory that says a 6 million vote lead is really a loss. We’re all waiting.

    2. Why don’t you suck a dick, dumb shit?

      1. From the guy that clearly never gets his sucked?

        Incels for Trump!

  15. We’ve reached the part of this saga where the final piece of evidence, the last limp spaghetto hurled at the wall, is the rational deduction that there’s no way that so many people could have voted against a demented orange bug chasing mass murdering traitorous freakshow.

    Oh no, how improbable that a majority of American voters wants to see the White House cleansed of that useless fat bastard and his diseased sycophants.

    “Hey, ACB is a dumb cunt, maybe she’ll save me from the bad feelings!”

    I mean I’m having fun.

    1. Well…you tried. That sort of counts.

    2. “there’s no way that so many people could have voted against a demented orange bug chasing mass murdering traitorous freakshow”

      On the flip side, (and the less deranged side) are we supposed to buy the idea that at least some of the people who have been told for years that Trump was a” demented orange bug chasing mass murdering traitorous freakshow” WOULDN’T try to commit voter fraud to get him out of office?

      1. I certainly hope they had a plan. God knows the Republicans wouldn’t have batted an eye at stealing a closer election. They’ve done it before.

        Since you’re going to assume it was cheated anyway even though nothing looks remotely irregular, maybe we’ll just let you go on distrusting the system in the hopes that you never vote again. Let Trump be your president in exile. Pay attention to his twats instead of scientific reality. Just stop whining and grousing for fuck’s sake. We have too many real problems to solve to be spending all our time on the emotional pathologies of Trump supporters.

    3. Enjoy it while it lasts. A LOT of people are going to make D’s lives into a living hell for the next 4 years. Nothing you say will be trusted. You will get resistance on every mundane thing you try to pass. Even non-controversial bills will have a hell of a fight because it will be assumed by default that you D’s are attempting some form of corruption.

      You will have to prove your innocence on every…little…thing. And in four years, R’s will copy your playbook out from under you since voter fraud is legal now.

      Consequences to your actions, bitch.

      1. Uh… we all lived through the Obama years and the Trump years and everything you’ve threatened here has been going on since we elected a black dude to the presidency. Are you saying you’re going to continue to be obstructionist jerks in the exact same way as you’ve been for the last 12 years? I think you need a better threat if you want to motivate people.

        And look up “projection” on Wikipedia. HTH.

      2. What else is new. Projection, it’s what Republicans do. Fuck everything up and blame Democrats. I’ve been around the block a couple times dude.

        Nobody took any actions but voted your guy out of office. I’m sorry you lack the emotional maturity to handle basic civilization. Perhaps when you’re done behaving like a common terrorist, you’ll be put in a cage where such people might be more comfortable.

  16. You keep responding to all this BS as if it isn’t just a con. This election fraud thing has generated $170M, of which most goes into a Super PAC Trump created, and which can be used for personal use.

    That’s it. Period. He’s a con man…always has been, always will be. He just waits for the next sucker to show up, like all these commenters here who wait in line to sign up for his “university,” to buy his steaks, to invest in one failed business after another, and now…to fight election fraud that’s been nothing but a farce from day one.

    You keep responding to this as if facts matter, math matters, judicial rulings matter. Not to a con man. As Randy Newman said, it’s money that matters. And Trump is always looking for the next grift that allows him to separate you from yours.


    1. Trump aside, our election process has serious problems now that we’re doing mass mail in ballots. There is no way to verify that most mail-in ballots were cast legally. If there is no paper trail to audit and no observers were allowed to watch the envelope be opened and information verified, then you’re just running on faith.

      And then PA raises all sorts of questions about what state legislatures and Governors can do right before an election. How much can they arbitrarily/illegally change the election process before it becomes election interference?

      We need to rework how we do elections. Even if you don’t think there was a significant amount of fraud, you have to admit that much of the country has no confidence in our election process. Even if you think those people are being irrational, they aren’t going away any time soon. We’d all be better off fixing the system so they can’t complain next time around.

      1. It was the Democrats (i.e. Gov. Wolf, Democrat County officials, and PA’s Democrat Supreme Court) who conspired to reform/destroy the election process in PA via mail in ballots (by feigning concern about covid), and those same Democrats will adamantly oppose any efforts by the Republican controlled PA General Assembly to fix the many problems created by mail in ballots (so they can also steal future elections).

      2. Their confidence apparently depends on whether their candidate wins or loses. You can’t fix stupid.

        And as much of a skeptic of federalism as I am, it has saved our elections to have them run 50+ different ways. There’s virtually no physical way to cheat on a global scale.

        Just implement the reforms Democrats support and that Republicans have opposed at every opportunity and we’ll have paper trails and all the security you could want.

        1. “There’s virtually no physical way to cheat on a global scale.”

          Why? Because we have 50 ways of running elections? Look everybody! Tony can’t count past 50!

          1. It’s a layer of security. We’ve been through this before. Liberals always wondered whether 2004 Ohio was stolen by a partisan psychopath secretary of state and suspicious voting machines.

            The problem is we got stuck with Bush and you’re going to get stuck with Biden, and even if someone cheated, if you can’t prove a crime then you don’t get to overturn an election. Welcome to kindergarten.

      3. I don’t think this tracks logically.

        2/3rds of states have a no-excuse vote by mail system. I live in one of them. A few state do all voting by mail. The remainder require a valid reason to receive an absentee ballot. There have been comprehensive studies on voter fraud over the years and they all come up with the answer that actual voter fraud is rare and never enough to sway an election. Even Trump’s own 2016 fraud investigation came up with nothing. There is no data to support that election fraud is a problem.

        Yet, here we are discussing fraud. Why? Because people like Trump bring it up, spin it up, publicize it, hype it, and it gets re-broadcast on partisan news and feeds conspiracy theories amplified by social media. Trump has been claiming fraud since he *won* in 2016. Back then it was because he lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million voters. Now, it’s because he just plain lost the vote. But in all cases, there is no evidence of any meaningful fraud.

        So, to your logic: if you think there was a significant amount of fraud and have no confidence in elections, well, you’re doing so despite all actual facts so it is unlikely that anything anyone does is going to sway your opinion. If you think people are being irrational, well, you’re right because they are and the facts make that clear. So the conspiracy-believing crowd isn’t going away and they cannot be convinced by reality. What then?

        You posit that we “fix the system.” But the system (meaning: voting) isn’t broken. It can always use a tune-up, of course, but it ain’t broken. “Fixing” it doesn’t fix the problem, anyway, since any real improvements are unlikely to sway people who believe in the unreal.

        Rather, I say we figure out how to bring the conspiracy-believing people back to reality because that’s the real problem here. “Fixing” the voting system doesn’t fix the problem. People who are willing to believe carpet-bagging scam artists today will believe them tomorrow no matter what the facts on the ground may be.

        Now if you want to talk about voter suppression and other anti-vote tactics designed to keep one or another group from the polls, then that can be fixed. If you want to talk about gerrymandering, that can be fixed. Both of which would be helpful in the long run. If we cannot fix conspiracy-crazed whackos, we can at least limit the damage they can cause.

    2. You are right on the money here. Trump is raking in the money and on January 20, 2020 he will announce for 2024 and people will send him more money. He in control of the GOP, his kid will have jobs advising the party and all the meeting will be at Trump Hotels. This is the biggest cash cow ever and Trump and family are not about to lose out on this payday. So for all you who love Trump show your loyalty give, give and give more.

  17. Rudy whispering to assistant in court: Never tell anyone what I say here.
    Rudy to judge: We are not alleging fraud, Your Honor. These are not fraud cases.
    Barr: No evidence of widespread fraud.
    Rudy: Better check your life insurance, Billy. The whole world heard you.

  18. Wait, I thought Barr was Trump’s right-hand-man in covering up all of Trump’s misdeeds. I thought Barr deserved to be impeached for showing so much bias towards Trump. It’s almost as if the Democrats have been flailing for the past four years, lashing out at anyone who doesn’t obviously display an irrational hatred of the Orange Man.

    On topic, it doesn’t matter if there was enough fraud to change the election. Are we saying that part of our election security is to just never have a close election count? What happens when we get another Bush/Gore result that hinges on a few hundred votes? By then it will be too late to address election fraud. Root out all the fraud you can now and change the system to stop it from happening in the future. Fighting this fight as hard as he can through Jan. 20 is the last, best thing Trump can do for this country as president.

    1. Oh, also, stop making it trivially easy for lazy, ignorant people to vote. Voting was already trivially easy in every state for any halfway competent person. Get an ID, register, look up your ballot online (at the library, if need be), and show up at your poll on election day. It takes all of an hour a year, on average to manage all of that, even if you move. If someone can’t manage such a simple task once or twice a year, then how can they be competent enough to choose who will next wield the monopoly on violence?

    2. On topic, it doesn’t matter if there was enough fraud to change the election.

      To the contrary, that has been Trump’s central claim for almost a month now, and overturning the election is the secondary purpose† of all the “fraud!” misinformation of the past month.
      †The primary purpose is, of course, to separate Republicans from their money, and line Trump’s pockets with it.

  19. The deep staters at DOJ (who conspired to prevent indictments against Hillary and to implement their “insurance policy” to remove Trump from office since 2016) have made it impossible for Barr to actually do his job, which is why highly acclaimed prosecutor John Durham has delivered NOTHING, and why Barr hasn’t investigated the 2020 election heist.

    Meanwhile, Reason has betrayed libertarianism, the US Constitution and rational judgement by going ALL IN for Joe Biden.

    1. The US Constitution and rational judgement? Certainly.

      Libertarianism? Nope.

  20. So we are going to take the word of a group, the FBI, that already spied on Trump by sending a spy in to plant info then sent another spook in to get them to say they heard about what the other spy said to implicate them for info they gave them. The FBI also used false documents to a FISA court based on info they planted in the media to back up their claims. We are supposed to accept the FBI’s conclusion of no fraud HELL no we won’t are we stupid here.

    1. Also Barr doesn’t do any investigating he reports what his clown show tell him happened and now he just wants to keep his retirement because he knows the jig is up there are no more legitimate elections. He will be out after Biden gets in

      1. And if all the elections are rigged, why should you bother voting?

        You’ll be much happier being in the permanent opposition. God knows you people can’t govern for shit anyway.

        1. Why should we bother voting? Are you suggesting we switch to the Dem alternative and start cheating? After all, it was legalized by Democrats this year. The courts appear to have given a strong precedent to the legalization of voter fraud as well. I don’t advocate cheating myself because my moral compass is superior to a Democrat’s, but I fully expect plenty of R’s to do it.

          Karma’s a bitch!

          1. So you’re going to invent a crime someone committed from zero evidence, then use that as an excuse to commit that crime yourself.

            You have the ethical maturity of a hyena.

  21. This is the same William Barr who got an orgasmic thrill down his leg when Lon Horiuchi killed Vicki Weaver, and filed an amicus brief for Horiuchi saying that AGs have the right and need the ability to send snipers out to murder innocent American citizens. But I expect no less from “reason.” Your Silicon Valley overlords are pleased — you win a cookie.

    This comment not approved by Silicon Valley brain slugs.

  22. Have you looked?

    President Trump, himself, filed a new lawsuit in Wisconsin against the state’s Elections Commission, alleging “unlawful and unconstitutional acts” by officials and mayors:

    Specifically, the lawsuit alleges the following key unlawful acts:

    – Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission undercutting Wisconsin’s Photo Identification Law.

    – A Plan by the Mayors of Wisconsin’s five largest cities (Milwaukee, Madison, Kenosha, Green Bay and Racine) and funded by an out-of-state organization known as the Center for Tech & Civic Life to implement a new form of balloting in Wisconsin using un-manned, absentee ballot drop boxes without adequate or uniform chain of custody standards and security protocols contrary to the Wisconsin Election Code.

    – Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission that facilitated the unlawful, un-manned absentee ballot drop box Plan by endorsing illegal drop boxes (which were then ultimately used throughout the State in the election), failing to adopt uniform chain of custody and security protocols for the ballots in the drop boxes and failing to ensure public access to the process.

    – Directives by the Wisconsin Elections Commission to election officials to tamper with witness certifications on absentee ballot envelopes which facilitated the counting of unlawful ballots in the election in violation of the Wisconsin Election Code.

    “The United States Constitution prevents the rules in a Presidential Election from being changed at the last minute by un-elected bureaucrats and local politicians who may have a more narrow interest in the outcome of the election. We have alleged in our Complaint on behalf of the President that the Wisconsin Elections Commission and other state and local officials in Wisconsin broke the Wisconsin Election Code and ran an unconstitutional and unlawful election. Nothing is more important to our national fabric and future than integrity in our electoral process. This lawsuit is one-step in the direction of fairer, more transparent, more professional and ultimately more reliable elections in America.” Bill Bock, lead counsel in the Wisconsin federal suit for Donald J. Trump.

    “Today’s federal lawsuit in Wisconsin reveals an apparently coordinated effort to push a new form of balloting upon Wisconsin voters that was not protected by uniform chain of custody and security standards and protocols. Regrettably, this is the same sort of conduct we have seen across many battleground states that Democrats knew they had to win to defeat the President where the rules of the election were changed at the last minute and guardrails against fraud were simultaneously lowered.

    We hope that the State Legislatures in every affected State will take up this battle to protect the voters in their State. This is a solemn responsibility the Constitution entrusts directly to State Legislatures. The time for full scale investigations and resolve to uphold the Constitution is now, and President Trump is committed to fighting corruption and ensuring free and fair elections today and into the future for every American.” Jenna Ellis, Senior Legal Adviser for Trump 2020 Campaign and Attorney to President Trump.

  23. Also

    (1) Cybersecurity expert says there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election
    (2) More than 100 people who worked for Dominion Voting Systems have removed their LinkedIn profiles since Election Day
    (3) Parent company of Dominion Voting Systems received $400 million from Swiss bank 75% owned by Chinese gov’t
    (4) Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome
    (5) Twitter blocks links to Sidney Powell’s legal defense fund website, brands it “potentially harmful”
    (6) Twitter bans Senator Doug Mastriano after he led hearing over Pennsylvania election discrepancies
    (7) Culture War contines after Trump – Matt Taibbi
    (8) NBC News is a CIA mouthpiece – Glenn Greenwald
    (9) MSM demand Facebook, Google and Twitter censorship – Glenn Greenwald
    (10) Gab banned by payment processors
    (11) YouTube, Google suppress AE911Truth, boost ‘authoritative’ sources like NIST

  24. I’m surprised Trump hasn’t fired Barr by now. Hasn’t he already replaced 90+% of his staff, some positions multiple times? From what I’ve seen, Trump either has a bad judgement of character when he hires his people, or he’s a tyrant. Hmmmm, I wonder which one he is.

  25. He later made clear that he was not done investigating.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.