A future Miranda warning for litigants? "I wish the SDNY pro se clinic had made me aware that many third-party commercial services download court documents ... and publish this information on the internet."
No, says a district court at first; yes, it says six days later. Always good to check the docket for follow-up orders, if you have the time.
"When you've done nothing wrong, you shouldn't be subjected to an investigation," says Paul Snitko, whose box was seized in a March 22 FBI raid of a Beverly Hills business.
can go forward, as a First Amendment retaliation claim, holds a federal judge.
The announcement comes days after an exclusive report from Reason attracted national attention to the case.
“The Act is so rife with fundamental infirmities that it appears to have been enacted without any regard for the Constitution,” the lawsuit reads.
The Supreme Court will soon announce if it'll consider an appeal.
A Tennessee trial court "enjoined the parties [including a recent candidate for elected office] from making any public comments about each other and from making any 'negative or disrespectful comments' about each other to third parties."
if it's done without adequate investigation, and as a means of retaliating against the teenager's parent.
at least through discovery and until the motion for summary judgment; Netflix’s motion to dismiss has been denied.
Even when states authorize gun confiscation orders, identifying would-be mass shooters is a daunting challenge.
I much enjoyed being on this American Constitution Society chapter panel.
Two Illinois legislators meet with a high school principal complaining about an anti-China poster distributed by a student group, which promptly loses its faculty sponsor and has to
Remember, the lawyer’s true superpower is to turn every question into a question about procedure.
by limiting it to exclude people who sincerely believed the material wasn't revenge porn (i.e., the participants had agreed that it be publicly released).
A study of civil rights cases found that "police officers are virtually always indemnified" by their employers.
Umbrellas, black clothing, and chanting "all cops are bastards" signal criminal street gang membership, prosecutors said.
The university abruptly shut down dozens of classes over an unfounded claim that a white student was taunted.
In a lawsuit, attorneys for the box's owner allege that federal agents conducted an illegal search that may have resulted in the loss of some valuable gold coins.
Special bonus connections: disbarred lawyers, Tupac Shakur, New York City political figures, and then-not-yet-Attorney-General Michael Mukasey.
The line between commercial decisions and advocacy is not as clear as opponents of anti-Israel boycotts suggest.
The lawsuit stemmed from CNN's coverage of Dershowitz's argument in the first Trump impeachment trial.
The case is an indictment on just how hard it is to get accountability when the government violates your rights.
Charles Marohn called himself an engineer in speeches and articles while his license was temporarily expired. The First Amendment protects his right to do that.
Yet "[i]t is particularly troubling to the Court that [the lawyer] appears to have survived this motion more by dumb luck than any concerted effort on his part to comply with either his professional responsibilities or the orders of this Court."
(Lolicon is "A Japanese term derived from the English phrase 'Lolita complex,' lolicon describes a fascination with cartoons of very young-looking girls engaged in varying degrees of erotic behavior.")
But people have as much right to protest vaccination sites as they do to protest factories, stores, or abortion clinics.
Plus: critical race theory and ideal libertarian political appointees
So holds a Pennsylvania court, affirming a conviction for fraudulently obtaining money by claims of veteran status.
But modest redactions are permissible.
The decision will make it even more difficult for victims to hold the government accountable when their rights are violated.
Though Trump is gone, the desire to bend the internet toward partisan goals is alive and well.
even if the press release accurately summarizes the Complaint; the rule is different in some states, such as California.
The Supreme Court has a chance to fix this. The stakes are high.
Plus: Trump administration spied on CNN reporter, the right's wrong turn on economic liberty, and more...
We expect British royals to favor muzzling commoners, but too many lawmakers feel the same way.
The movie depicts the fictionalized gathering of Cassius Clay, Malcolm X, Jim Brown, and Sam Cooke, who spar over what each is doing to advance civil rights.
National surveys obscure large regional variations in public opinion about abortion limits.
The surprising move raises concerns about academic freedom.
Calling a classmate a racist slur on Snapchat is offensive. It’s also protected speech.
Plus: Three things that aren't as bad as they seem, Tennessee bans certain treatments for transgender minors, and more...
Cops say they can't function without qualified immunity, while their supporters on the right say abolishing it would be a step toward defunding the police. Neither claim is true.
The victim will now have no right to argue his case before a jury in civil court.
It's a working model for non-state governance in cyberspace that is vastly preferable to government control of social media.
Targeting “extremists” threatens civil liberties while increasing the stresses that lead to violence.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks