"The AI Data Will Provide an Unrivaled View into the Mind of a Defendant …"
"whose [mental state] is itself the measure of Plaintiff’s [punitive] damages."
"whose [mental state] is itself the measure of Plaintiff’s [punitive] damages."
The president stands out from his modern predecessors by openly displaying his contempt for the First Amendment.
And there's a defamation case stemming from all that.
Idaho Supreme Court finds false caselaw quotations, after jury found false factual assertions.
"[D]efendant purportedly posted more than 20 videos ... attacking plaintiff's character with 'blatantly false allegations of wrongdoing' and 'highly offensive and demeaning fake [AI] videos.'"
Their defamation and breach of contract case against Stefanie Lambert can go forward, a judge concluded.
"Professor Abdou provides no authority which stands for the proposition that expressing disapproval of a foreign terrorist organization in a Congressional hearing amounts to discrimination or creates a hostile work environment ...."
The court is unmoved by plaintiff's claims that defendants' coverage of the underlying dispute led to people threatening her.
Jane and I examine the Robby Starbuck v. Google decision, one of the first major court opinions arising from generative AI "hallucinations."
UPDATE: Though this opinion was handed down just two weeks ago, it turns out to be a slightly revised version of an opinion from July 2022; my apologies for not noticing this at the outset.
The recommendation includes entry of a default judgment against Boteach in a defamation lawsuit brought against him by a Florida hotel.
A sample allegation: "[T]his was orchestrated because at this point, you fucking know that this was not an original idea. You know that it was stolen from a black creator, and you are still doing backflips to make excuses for that."
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.