"Gaslighting" Isn't "Abuse" for Child Custody Law Purposes
So holds an Oregon appellate court.
So holds an Oregon appellate court.
Department of Homeland Security
Plus: FISA reauthorization, driverless trucks in California, and an Epstein suicide note.
The term “hate speech” gets thrown around a lot, but it’s legally protected in the U.S.
Plus: FISA reauthorization passes the House, a very capitalist museum, escalation in the redistricting wars, and more...
So reasons a Florida appellate court, though other courts in other states seem to take a different view.
Plus: The Supreme Court says “demands for a charity’s private member or donor information” raises First Amendment problems.
Jane and I lay out the structure of American defamation law, using the recent lawsuits brought by FBI Director Kash Patel as a launching point. Special bonus: Almost no discussion of New York Times v. Sullivan (an important case but one that listeners have doubtless heard much about elsewhere).
Financial censorship should worry us all, suggests Rainey Reitman in Transaction Denied.
The Court dispatches with an easy case the lower courts should have gotten right.
Cars are already spying on drivers. A 2021 law requires manufacturers to install more tracking technology.
Plus: A dicey FISA reauthorization, kingly quips about burning down the White House, the world's narrowest tax breaks, and more...
"[S]tatements made to third parties can be 'directed at' the victim," and thus criminal harassment if they're repeated and likely to cause serious annoyance or distress, "when they are designed to provoke an adverse consequence against the victim."
"Geofence" searches illustrate the perilous combination of modern technology and deference to law enforcement.
When he returned to the White House, Trump vowed to protect free speech from the government. The FCC's latest move against ABC and Disney looks like the opposite.
The owners of the house that Marilyn Monroe died in claim in a lawsuit that the city took their property when it landmarked it.
The panel (by a 2-1 vote) stayed a district court order that, among other things, blocked the newly established escort requirement.
The government wants access to millions of cell phone location histories. The Supreme Court will decide what the Fourth Amendment allows.
But the judge suspends his decision pending appeal, so that the appellate court has "time to consider and decide the merits of this case, absent unnecessary procedural deadlines."
Some states still allow vengeful spouses to sue a third party for destroying their marriages.
The feds have been demanding that tech companies identify the administration's anonymous online critics. That violates the First Amendment.
To justify punishing a legislator for his speech, a FIRE brief notes, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth relies on a Supreme Court precedent that is clearly inapposite.
Sen. Ron Wyden warns that Americans would be “stunned” at how officials have used the law.
Separation of Church and State
The 5th Circuit upheld a controversial law requiring Texas schools to display the Ten Commandments.
even though (as the full article explained) the conviction was for attempt to commit stalking, not for conspiracy to commit murder.
and thus presumptively a First Amendment violation (though here the presumption was rebutted by national security interests).
The order came in a peculiar context—a civil lawsuit over the custody of a child born in Afghanistan—but its logic extends further.
"The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence," said acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks