Supreme Court Ruling Offers Hope to an Iowa Marijuana User Who Got 4 Years for Owning Guns
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Hemani could open the door to relief for cannabis consumers convicted of illegal gun possession.
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Hemani could open the door to relief for cannabis consumers convicted of illegal gun possession.
Is the D.C. Circuit willing to allow "conservative" panel decisions on hot-button issues to stand? And is en banc review more than a way to ensure further review at One First Street?
The Supreme Court could be poised to decide whether it's you or Big Tech companies.
The decision is a modest but welcome step toward rectifying the injustice of criminalizing conduct that violates no one’s rights.
The Pung family of Isabella County, Michigan, maintained they were entitled to fair market value. The high court disagreed, but with a twist.
Even under the Supreme Court's highly elastic understanding of that clause, Thomas says, such laws do not qualify as regulation of interstate commerce.
Understanding the stakes of Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections.
The conservative justice continues to wage a lonely legal crusade over the Commerce Clause.
The Supreme Court ruled that "an agreement not to appeal a sentence is unenforceable when it would result in a miscarriage of justice."
The Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Hemani.
The unanimous decision upholding the gun rights of cannabis consumers is striking given the Supreme Court's long history of accommodating the war on drugs.
A landmark win for the right to keep and bear arms in United States v. Hemani.
Leave it to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to divide the justices in an unusual way.
Understanding the stakes in Kian v. Florida
Richard Hershey is asking the Supreme Court to overrule a 5th Circuit decision that blocked the lawsuit provoked by that obvious First Amendment violation.
The proposal was nixed only after White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf explained why it was legally dubious.
How a four-decade-old dissent may now help the president fire independent federal agency heads at will
Plus: the Supreme Court's biggest pending decisions, renewed court-packing debates, and the economic fallout from the Iran war
These arguments are relatively weak. And to the extent they are valid, they can be addressed without changing the Court's ideological balance.
The JAWBONE Act would let Americans sue government officials who try to restrict their speech by pressuring social media platforms, broadcasters, or AI companies.
Three different VC bloggers are among the speakers: Jonathan Adler, Keith Whittington, and myself.
Court-packing would cause great harm, including by boosting power-grabbing presidents like Trump. Callais's flaws are better addressed by other means.
The president has repeatedly argued that courts have no business deciding whether his actions are legal.
The court unanimously ruled that penile plethysmography is unreliable and inadmissible as evidence of recidivism risk.
"There was nothing inevitable about it. Absolutely nothing," the Supreme Court justice tells Reason's Nick Gillespie.
Damon Root discusses the path to emancipation, the struggle to secure freedom after the Civil War, and the constitutional changes that remade America.
Plus: a few words about my new book
The president’s habitual attempts to criminalize dissent hark back to tyrants of yore.
The two judicial conservatives continue to disappoint criminal justice reform advocates.
The federal government is still fighting to collect nonprofit donor information despite Supreme Court warnings that such demands chill free speech.
They cost each American household roughly $1,000 in 2025, with more coming in 2026.
Lifetime tenure for federal judges has been the constitutional practice since ratification.
Perry County Sheriff Nick Weems preposterously claimed that Larry Bushart had threatened "mass violence" at a school.
That defense applies only when an officer "reasonably" believed he was acting within his federal authority.
A discussion of the Supreme Court's "Shadow Docket" on the We the People Podcast.
Three Second Amendment groups say the law violates the right to own arms in common use for self-defense and other lawful purposes.
Plus: Chinese relations, far-right extremists, Yale discriminated, and more...
The Court stayed a lower court order that would have blocked FDA rules allowing the prescription of mifepristone to terminate pregnancies via telemedicine.
Should it take more than a 5–4 vote for the Supreme Court to strike down a federal law?
The 6th Circuit upheld that 158-year-old law, while the 5th Circuit concluded it could not be justified as a revenue measure.
Even as the Justice Department files lawsuits aimed at vindicating gun rights, it undermines them in other cases.
The civil liberties group, which long maintained that there is no constitutional right to arms, sang a different tune at the Supreme Court this year.
Plus: A "supremely cringe" viral tweet about the Supreme Court
A recent YouGov poll shows the Court is likely less unpopular than before. The tariff ruling may have given it a boost. The poll has several other notable findings, as well.
The justices will consider what to do with the Fifth Circuit's mifepristone order for a few more days
Neil Gorsuch's new book reminds us that to accelerate progress, we must first acknowledge the progress that has already occurred.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks