SCOTUS Full of Trump Appointees Joins the Conspiracy To Deny Trump His Rightful Victory
The justices declined to intervene on behalf of Republicans who challenged absentee voting in Pennsylvania.
The justices declined to intervene on behalf of Republicans who challenged absentee voting in Pennsylvania.
According to the ruling, the former Trump attorney also filed the wrong claims in the wrong court at the wrong time on behalf of the wrong plaintiffs.
"Don't listen to my friends," the president says, referring to supporters who took his fraud allegations seriously.
Some of the changes are reasonable. But many of the new questions are badly designed and incorporate serious errors. Moreover, such tests raise the deeper issue of why immigrants are required to pass a test to get the right to vote, but natives are not.
"This is about restoring faith and confidence in American elections," the president says.
The former Trump attorney's election fraud lawsuits feature the same sort of dubious evidence that has failed to impress courts across the country.
Either the AG is acknowledging reality, or he's joined the anti-Trump deep state conspiracy.
Trying to counter viral election fraud claims is like playing whack-a-mole. [With Updates]
Fox News interviewer Maria Bartiromo uncritically accepts Trump's outlandish conspiracy theory.
"The Campaign cannot win this lawsuit," the 3rd Circuit says. "The Campaign's claims have no merit."
At least nine GOP senators are publicly urging the president to concede or questioning his claim that he actually won.
Both the president and his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, have publicly embraced Powell's wild claims about voting machine manipulation.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann rejected an attempt to block certification of Pennsylvania's election results.
Without a shred of evidence, Sidney Powell is alleging a conspiracy more vast than Russiagate. Shouldn't that raise red flags?
Although the president's lawyer says the anti-Trump conspiracy is "easily provable," the affidavits he cites fall notably short.
St. Louis residents agree to shift to approval voting for local primaries.
The president's rhetoric and his campaign's actions are corrosive, but even the most powerful man on the planet can't control America's diffuse election system.
The fabulism that is inseparable from Trumpism can conjure up "millions" of stolen votes as easily as "more than a MILLION" protesters.
Trump's campaign officials and attorneys are peddling this nonsense with help from credulous Fox News hosts, but their theories don't stand up to scrutiny.
Plus: Another COVID-19 vaccine, another blow against DHS DACA order, and more...
The president still insists the election was stolen by a vast criminal conspiracy.
Even if the GOP's complaints are valid, they do not prove a vast anti-Trump conspiracy.
Plus: Hillbilly Elegy film flops, TikTok would like to know if it's still banned, and more...
The newest lawsuit in Pennsylvania is a longshot attempt to argue that all mail-in voting is unconstitutional because it differs from traditional, in-person voting. It's likely to fail.
The nefarious scheme evidently includes Republican officials and Trump-friendly news outlets.
The only person he needs to convince is himself.
It's the world of the present, not the controversies of the past, that motivated voters.
Biden appears to be winning, but the election is far from settled.
Plus: Republicans denounce Trump fraud allegations, Trump campaign mounts multiple legal challenges, and more...
This isn't fraud. This isn't a scheme to steal the election. It is the very predictable outcome of the president's own words and actions.
What is the platform accomplishing by calling further attention to the president's wild claims of voting fraud?
Trump's tweets are muddying the process. His legal challenges deserve to be heard, and all votes will continue to be counted.
The president's complaints about "a major fraud" present a familiar puzzle.
The most expensive ballot initiative campaign in Massachusetts history ended with a resounding victory for property rights.
The legal fight over mail-in ballots may soon heat up at SCOTUS.
American voters have the chance to usher in a few libertarian policies this election, courtesy of these state ballot measures.
A new lawsuit says the state's electioneering statutes violate the First Amendment.
There was nothing remotely fraudulent about the 127,000 votes cast in Harris County's drive-thru voting station.
There could be in some situations. But less often than many assume. And, ironically, the same reasoning suggests many people would have a duty NOT to vote in such cases.
A lawsuit filed just days before the election asks federal courts to toss out all the votes already cast at drive-through polling stations in Harris County.
Plus: Biden should stop bragging about the Violence Against Women Act, Trump should stop bragging about tariffs, and more...
Plus: Fewer Americans are watching sports, Milton Friedman's powerful TV series turns 40, Amy Coney Barrett joins the Supreme Court, and more...
The issue is currently before the Supreme Court in the case of Trump v. New York.
It might be better to find something else you'd rather do on Election Day.
Across 14 states that track party affiliations of absentee-ballot-voters, 56 percent of mail-in votes have been cast by Democrats and only 23 percent have been cast by Republicans.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.