Is a Government Shutdown Better Than More Reckless Borrowing?
Short-term solutions and governing from crisis to crisis isn't working.
Short-term solutions and governing from crisis to crisis isn't working.
I recently did interviews on these topics with Reason TV, the Washington Post, and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
The Colorado governor finds common ground with many libertarians. But does he really stand for more freedom?
Plus: New York City's crackdown on short-term rentals, Brazil's UFO investigations, and more...
Police also wrongly cited him for "improper hand signal" after the man flipped them off.
"[The decision] showcases the now-familiar contrast between the Court’s two different approaches to conservative jurisprudence: the strict formalism of Justice Gorsuch—a stern insistence that the United States live up to the letter of its legal obligations come hell or high water—as opposed to the status-quo, stare decisis driven conservative jurisprudence of Justice Kavanagh and Chief Justice Roberts."
"[T]he Court held that despite being a 'trustee' for the Navajo Nation and despite having promised the Navajo water sufficient to make its lands productive, the United States does not have an obligation to help the Navajo obtain that water."
Politicians are throwing laws at the wall and seeing what sticks.
"The opportunity to think for ourselves and to express those thoughts freely is among our most cherished liberties," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion.
A nice review of Climate Liberalism by Jordan Lofthouse (and a less nice one by Robert Bradley).
Our political leaders envision a future in which high-tech implants snitch about our use of painkillers.
Alabamans have no right "to conspire with others in Alabama to try to have abortions performed out of state," argues Attorney General Steve Marshall.
A federal circuit judge writes that Detroit's vehicle seizure scheme "is simply a money-making venture—one most often used to extort money from those who can least afford it."
Plus: Meta revises controversial "dangerous organizations" policy, a win against civil asset forfeiture in Detroit, and more...
Republican-controlled Huntington Beach has sued the state government to stop enforcement of state housing mandates.
A cabinet minister who once defended the right to blaspheme now wants a crackdown.
Among other things, "Default judgment will be entered against Giuliani as a discovery sanction ..., holding him civilly liable on plaintiffs' defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, civil conspiracy, and punitive damage claims ...."
Americans support tighter laws, but not as much as they distrust government and like owning guns.
People should be free to choose how cautious to be. Mask mandates, lockdowns, and closing schools won't stop the virus.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit takes issue with how the FDA evaluated Fontem's unflavored vaping products.
The Biden Administration is revising the rules for how agencies conduct cost-benefit analyses, and some CBA experts have expressed concerns.
The state has filed a motion to set an execution date for Kenneth Eugene Smith, who survived a previous execution attempt.
Plus: The real message behind DeSantis' abortion anecdote, midwives sue over Alabama regulations, and more…
can go forward, says a federal court.
Applicants are currently waiting 10 to 13 weeks for routine processing.
"This appeal raises a question not yet addressed by any California court: whether a public official may be bribed with a promise to donate to the official's office."
Plus: A listener question about the continued absurdity of sports stadium subsidies
On September 5, the Keystone State is removing a big barrier to health care.
"[T]he Government argue[d] that when considering that the charged offenses occurred after the acquittal, the [appellant's] tactics were emboldened and this factor weighs in favor of admissibility."
"Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i) ... commands that the court must address the defendant personally to afford him the chance to speak or present evidence in mitigation."
Banks routinely snitch on customers and even deny services to people politicians don’t like.
A Texas judge ordered that the airline submit to training on the rights of religious believers after losing a religious discrimination lawsuit.
An interesting empirical study looks at whether better briefs lead to better outcomes.
The hospital baselessly claimed the teenager's mother wrote the petition after she was fired without cause.
A federal court rejects challengers' Free Exercise Clause and parental rights claims.
Mug shots are not taken to humiliate a defendant before they've been convicted. But that's the purpose they widely serve now.
The opinion was decided July 21, but was originally issued sealed; it was just unsealed today, in response to my motion to unseal.
Season 1, Episode 4 Podcasts
"You need an argument for why this is good for society. That's important, but you also need money."
In last night's Republican presidential debate, candidates floated various forms of military action against drug cartels.
Legislators abuse the emergency label to push through spending that would otherwise violate budget constraints.
Further debate on textualism, "common good constitutionalism," and the classical legal method.
An emergency proclamation by Gov. Josh Green offers developers the opportunity to route around almost all regulations on building homes.
Plus: GOP hopefuls debate tonight, Canadian link tax backfires, and more...
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10