What Happened to End Citizens United PAC v. FEC?
The D.C. Circuit reheard the case en banc over sixteen months ago, but there's still no opinion.
The D.C. Circuit reheard the case en banc over sixteen months ago, but there's still no opinion.
The Supreme Court has "no shortage of tools" to enforce the separation of powers, Justice Neil Gorsuch notes. "The only real question is whether we will use them."
With the Birthright Citizenship case still undecided, the Trump Administration has prevailed in every other immigration case before the Court this term, and some are quite consequential.
Since it lost its first case on technical procedural grounds, the company plans to try again.
A discussion on the legal background and implications of using the Congressional Review Act to rescind the waiver of California vehicle standards.
The Court stayed a lower court order that would have blocked FDA rules allowing the prescription of mifepristone to terminate pregnancies via telemedicine.
It appears the Supreme Court will decide the fate of telemedicine prescriptions for mifepristone without the benefit of an FDA filing.
The Court responds to the mifepristone shadow docket filings.
Drug makers seek interim relief after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit blocks FDA rule allowing mifepristone prescriptions via telemedicine. (With Update Below.)
The Trump Administration is refusing to defend a D.C. Circuit decision upholding a flawed energy conservation ruie.
The kids climate cases continue to have standing problems in federal court.
Mark Chenoweth discusses the SEC’s gag rule, the power of the administrative state, and the legal battle over whether regulators can silence their critics.
The Environmental Protection Agency is reportedly prepared to rescind the "endangerment finding" that underpins the regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.
A recent Federalist Society Teleforum with Adam White and Ilan Wurman
In addition to its symbolic significance, rescheduling the drug will facilitate research and provide tax relief to state-licensed cannabis suppliers.
After this decision, rescinding this Biden Administration rule may be more difficult.
A suit asking a district court judge to undo every Trump Administration energy policy initiative is dismissed with prejudice; appeal to follow.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin says the Endangerment Finding is the "holy grail" of climate policy. Perhaps it's really they great white whale.
The Administration's arguments have more doctrinal support than some might think
The Court concludes that limitations on the removal of NLRB Board members and NLRB administrative law judges are both unconstitutional.
The Sixth Circuit wrestles with what it means for a regulation to be "substantially the same" as one disapproved by Congress.
An easy way to avoid the merits in the latest high-stake health care litigation.
Further indication that independent agencies will not be "independent" much longer.
A new report suggests the Trump EPA is not content with cutting off stationary source regulation of greenhouse gases.
Will the en banc court agree? Will the Supreme Court?
The D.C. Circuit resolves a dispute over which set of visa regulations bind the public.
The Federal Trade Commission ignored mandatory regulatory impact analyses in an attempt to institute its "click-to-cancel" rule.
Class actions and Administrative Procedure Act claims can achieve much the same result as the nationwide orders that the Supreme Court rejected.
Tellingly, the president avoided defending his dubious interpretation of the 14th Amendment at the Supreme Court.
The significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County
Some additional thoughts on today's Supreme Court decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition.
Environmental Impact Statements do not have to consider upstream and downstream effects.
Instead of making a headlong rush at the endangerment finding, the Administration is adopting a more targeted deregulatory strategy.
A federal judge blocks the administration's "Student Criminal Alien Initiative," which targeted foreign students who had no criminal records.
A defense of the Supreme Court's decision to let President Trump remove members of the NLRB and MSPB.
The agency may be able to adopt a bank-shot strategy to preclude most (but not all) greenhouse gas regulation under the Clean Air Act without contesting basic climate science.
Trump rightly decries the "absurd and unjust" consequences of proliferating regulatory crimes.
The administration's demands extend far beyond its avowed concern about antisemitism and enforcement of "civil rights laws."
A useful reminder from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to read circuit rules before filing.
A simple and quite symbolic presidential decree that symbolizes quite a bit, but accomplishes very little.
Although the Court lifted an order that temporarily blocked removal of suspected gang members, it unambiguously affirmed their right to judicial review.
The justices unanimously overturned a 5th Circuit decision that deemed the agency's treatment of e-liquids "arbitrary and capricious."
The Court's opinion upholding federal regulation of "ghost guns" makes passing reference to Loper Bright Enterprises.
President Trump acts to remove two Democratic commissioners from the Federal Trade Commission. Litigation is likely.
The move is part of a broader suite of deregulatory actions announced by the EPA Administrator, and is likely the least advisable item on the list.
The panel did not believe the Office of Special Counsel could be distinguished from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or Federal Housing Finance Authority.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.