Trump's Election Interference in California and Alaska Prompts a Series of Judicial Rebukes
Four federal courts say the Trump administration is trying to usurp the states' constitutional authority over elections.
Four federal courts say the Trump administration is trying to usurp the states' constitutional authority over elections.
U.S. District Judge David O. Carter rejected the Justice Department's demand that California officials segregate ballots from 20,000 voters it describes as "likely noncitizens."
The import taxes fit a pattern of dubious legal rationales for the president's protectionist policies.
A new poll shows that Americans are soundly rejecting the Trump administration's big government policies.
Trump launched his third round of broad tariffs after his first two attempts ran into legal trouble.
If laws passed by Congress do not apply to presidential actions, then we no longer live in a democracy.
Congress can stop Trump's Iran war by failing to fund it.
After a federal judge rejected his attempts at self-glorification, Trump said the building will "end up being ripped down" if he does not get the "recognition" he wants.
Trump's zero-sum trade talk is wrongheaded and authoritarian.
Their brief says the president is asserting "essentially boundless" authority to impose "economy-wide tariffs untethered from the statute Congress enacted."
By unilaterally razing and replacing the East Wing, the president again shows his disregard for the rule of law and the separation of powers.
The Democratic nominee won five swing states by less than one percentage point. Then things got crazy.
The Constitution assigns control of federal property to Congress, which never approved the president's demolition and replacement of the East Wing.
The Section 301 tariffs announced on Thursday overstep the powers granted by Congress and likely run afoul of the major questions doctrine.
The Supreme Court has "no shortage of tools" to enforce the separation of powers, Justice Neil Gorsuch notes. "The only real question is whether we will use them."
War making in "the power of a single man" is not what the Founders intended.
The proposal was nixed only after White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf explained why it was legally dubious.
The president has repeatedly argued that courts have no business deciding whether his actions are legal.
U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin struck down the fee, saying it exceeds the president's statutory authority and violates the separation of powers.
Legally, Trump must either cease operations or ask Congress for approval. He did neither, and Congress just went on recess.
The Court of International Trade is weighing the legality of the import taxes that the president wants to impose under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
"No statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon concluded when he enjoined the project.
Plus: Fox and Sinclair go crying to the FCC over sports streaming, and the Masters ticket lottery makes it too hard to get in
There are far too few checks left on executive power.
The Trump administration keeps trying to find legal loopholes, but the will of the people is the final judge of any major policy.
There was little rhyme or reason to the president's "emergency" tariffs, which fluctuated wildly depending on his mood.
A war by any other name must still be authorized by Congress.
The president’s invocation of Section 122 conflates a trade deficit with a balance-of-payments deficit.
The president's wildly inaccurate ideological labels are no more meaningful than his other ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with him.
The president is relying on a provision that the government's lawyers said had no "obvious application" to his goal of reducing the trade deficit.
The president neither understands nor appreciates the vital role of judicial independence in upholding the rule of law.
There are many laws that explicitly authorize the president to impose taxes on imports, but they include limits that Trump was keen to avoid.
"There is no exception to the major questions doctrine for emergency statutes," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts.
So now it’s radical to be against Biden-era merger notification requirements?
The story is an exercise in pettiness but also a perfect reason why Congress and the Supreme Court should limit the president's power grab.
The antiquated statute arguably allows the president to deploy the military in response to nearly any form of domestic disorder.
That embarrassing mistake highlights the slipperiness of Trump's attempts to justify legally dubious policies by invoking the specter of "foreign terrorist organizations."
If an indictment is enough to justify military action, why bother seeking congressional approval?
The president asserted broad powers to deport people, impose tariffs, and deploy the National Guard based on his own unilateral determinations.
Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
From immigration crackdowns to trade policy, the Trump administration is increasingly centralizing power in Washington, D.C.
Now, under Johnson's leadership, the House has changed its rules to make it even harder for lawmakers to signal their opposition to Trump's tariffs.
Trump's decision to reduce the tariffs on Swiss goods came just days after a Swiss delegation lavished the president with a variety of expensive gifts.
Donald Trump’s new stock-buying strategy isn’t socialism, but it is a step toward a government-controlled economy.
The former vice president liked being compared to the supervillain as a joke. But he had seriously villainous effects on millions of people in real life.
"The Trump Administration's Department of War gave me an ultimatum: call up your troops, or we will," Gov. J.B. Pritzker said.
Trump’s presidency may have amplified executive power, but unless lawmakers roll back those powers—and the bloated government behind them—the next administration will do the same.
The federal government can't even pass a budget. What's it doing buying a mine?
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.