Judge Says Warrantless Flock Search Violated Driver's Fourth Amendment Rights
The automated license plate reader system is “a type of indiscriminate mass surveillance," says a federal judge.
The automated license plate reader system is “a type of indiscriminate mass surveillance," says a federal judge.
The SEC should not keep a searchable record of Americans’ lawful trades, much less make them pay for it.
Gun registry bans might not be enough to protect gun owners from lists built from license-plate data.
Dan Osborn discusses breaking with both parties, opposing the Iran war, and how he plans to win over Trump voters.
AI-powered license plate readers flagged an abnormal driving pattern. Then officers made up reasons to pull him over and interrogated him, and they faked a K-9 alert to justify a nonconsensual search.
Defenders of Flock-style surveillance systems argue that people “have no reasonable expectation of privacy in public.” They're wrong.
The city's ordinance targets price gouging that its own evidence doesn't show—and it could kill discounts that save shoppers money.
Angela Lipps is suing for $10 million after a Fargo police detective ignored evidence that she was innocent and arrested her anyway.
Sens. Raphael Warnock and Katie Britt would seem to have little in common, but they both feel people should have more protection from bad cops with surveillance tech.
It was Flock that led cops to the wrong woman. It was police who ignored the other evidence and jailed her.
The rationale for AI facial scanning—to prevent bad actors from following students into buildings—makes little sense.
SparrowMap uses volunteer cameras to track the police in the same way police track the public. The government considers it a potential threat.
Gun owners should be paying attention to how police use gunfire microphones in conjunction with license plate cameras.
Cops keep carving out tech exceptions to the Fourth Amendment—and courts are giving them their blessing.
The immigration system has a confusing and opaque approach to foreigners who have done sex work.
Flock has been promoting a recent study of its cameras' impacts on car theft. But the paper didn't demonstrate a causal effect.
Trump says he supports the cameras simply because law enforcement does, no matter that they can be misused or abused.
New cars in the E.U. must now have cameras that track drivers' eyes and flag distractions.
Twenty-five years after the attacks, control and distrust rule the institutions that process foreigners who travel or immigrate to the United States.
We still believe in the false promise of trading freedom for safety.
While the Treasury forces money changers to report on suspected immigrants, Homeland Security is having police pull people over for suspicious transactions.
Recent comments by Greg Abbott and Ron DeSantis reflect a bipartisan backlash against warrantless surveillance.
Plus: J.D. Vance wants to pay stay-at-home parents, what America got wrong after 9/11, and whether FDA cuts are putting food safety at risk
Criticism from Trump allies and recent survey results show that resistance to widespread deployment of automated license plate readers spans the political spectrum.
Sonoma County launched the program to find illegal cannabis grows, but it secretly morphed into a wider search for minor building code violations.
A federal lawsuit claims the Waukesha County Sheriff’s Office used the Flock cameras without a legitimate government purpose and in retaliation against the vet for exercising his First Amendment right.
Americans are starting to recognize the dangers of pervasive surveillance by automated license plate readers.
What the simultaneous revolts against Flock and data centers can tell us about the power and risks of populism
Civil liberties advocates warn that Americans’ privacy and surveillance concerns won’t be solved without strong legal protections.
The tentacles of the Trump administration’s domestic spying apparatus are being revealed—and their reach is alarming.
Florida police departments have been adding drones, facial recognition technology, and license plate readers to their arsenals for years.
The State Department doesn’t accuse Autistici/Inventati of doing anything more than providing "untraceable" email accounts. But that’s enough to outlaw it as a terrorist organization.
Sometimes direct action is the only way to get politicians to consider civil liberties.
Benn Jordan wants the snoopers to be “a little unsettled.”
The U.S. government responded in ways that are so integrated into daily life that we no longer recognize them.
"If there are Flock cameras in your city, they are tracking, logging and sharing your movements without a warrant," warns the ACLU.
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi take on press restrictions, the war on drugs, Flock cameras, data centers, dating, punk rock, and why war is still bad, actually.
How many warrantless cellphone searches does it take to change border policy?
The company’s attempts to protect Americans’ privacy “will do nothing to protect innocent people from warrantless mass surveillance,” says an Institute for Justice attorney.
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi break down the absurd political fights about America’s surveillance state before jumping into House of the Dragon.
From wrongful arrests to officers stalking exes, license plate cameras keep exposing police failures.
Robby Soave and Amber Duke attack The Free Press' latest attempt to defend Flock cameras.
New details emerge regarding the Trump administration's surveillance dragnet cracking down on its online critics.
Michael Soyfer, an attorney at the Institute for Justice, calls it “just the tip of the iceberg.”
The Kansas Justice Institute argues that Wichita's "warrantless ALPR dragnet surveillance program" violates the state constitution's privacy protections.
The department plans to triple the number of surveillance towers along the U.S.-Mexico border over the next decade.
The Secret Service asserted a nonexistent "emergency" to track Comey's cellphone, and the FBI's evidence falls far short of proving his seashell picture was a crime.
The government is charging Samuel Tunick for telling them a code that would erase all the data on his phone—after they tried to take it on false pretenses.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.