No Religious Exemption from Forum Selection Clause in Employment Agreement
"Plaintiff should be treated like any other employee in his position, not that he should be favored based on his identity."
"Plaintiff should be treated like any other employee in his position, not that he should be favored based on his identity."
Foreign Law in American Courts
An interesting demonstration of how foreign law—including Islamic law—is sometimes applied (pursuant to American law) in American courts.
My new law review article defends long-standing principles: The privilege is not only constitutionally required, but it also helps to protect abuse victims by bringing sexual abuse to light.
The Ninth Circuit allows a religious discrimination claim against Alaska Airlines to go forward, based on its firing of Christian flight attendants who objected on a company-run intranet to the company's statement in favor of a federal ban on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination.
Understanding the stakes of Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections.
The league’s conduct is indisputably protected by the First Amendment. But that doesn't make it wise.
The D.C. mayoral race offers two leading candidates who are saying a lot of the right things about housing supply.
Uh, no, says the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, refusing to set aside plaintiff’s brother’s will, in which the brother left nothing to the plaintiff.
A guest post by Prof. Paul Finkelman.
Constitutional climate litigation seems to know no bounds.
"[A]bsent a clear showing of substantial harm to the child, the noncustodial parent retains his or her fundamental right to direct the child's religious upbringing during his or her parenting time."
Separation of Church and State
The 5th Circuit upheld a controversial law requiring Texas schools to display the Ten Commandments.
A federal judge ruled the Ten Commandments monument at the state Capitol must be removed.
I submitted some additional testimony to a House subcommittee, in response to questions from Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon.
The court's reasoning mostly turns on a conclusion that much of the prison behavior that plaintiffs complained about wasn't dictated by that particular law.
From a termination of parental rights decision by the Ohio Court of Appeals.
It was notable that the GOP members and witnesses made little effort to actually defend the legislation in question.
I will be testifying against this proposed legislation - which would authorize exclusion or deportation of all or most non-citizen Muslim immigrants.
A federal indictment accuses him and another journalist of conspiring with protesters who disrupted a St. Paul church service.
Rejecting a textualist reading of Section 702 in favor of a cramped co-religionist privilege would raise serious First Amendment objections.
A textualist reading of the Title VII religious employer exemption resolves a long-running circuit split.
A textualist interpretation of Section 702 shows that the exemption applies when a religious employer confines employment to people who fit the employer's religious observances, practices, and beliefs.
Understanding Title VII as a law designed to advance both liberty and equality helps to illuminate the statute's religious employer exemption.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.