Should Justice Barrett Recuse from 2020 Election Litigation? (Updated)
There's no precedent for a recusal, but there's also no precedent for the current situation.
There's no precedent for a recusal, but there's also no precedent for the current situation.
The Supreme Court nominee weighs in on a famous case.
Perhaps Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice David Wecht ought to read more history, starting with the speeches of the late Rep. John Bingham.
A Supreme Court Preview panel that focuses on administrative law.
All five cases were recommended to the White House by commutation recipient Alice Marie Johnson.
Advancing laws that further libertarian objectives, no matter who champions them, looks like the surer route to our preferred ends.
"This is probably not about persuading each other unless something really dramatic happens," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R–S.C.)
Plus: Supreme Court won't stop Pennsylvania from counting late ballots, proposed amendment would limit Court to nine justices, and more...
Sens. John Cornyn and Ben Sasse have spoken out sharply against Trump's policies and character as the election nears.
The implications of this move are as yet unclear.
The House Intelligence Committee is mulling ways to stop an "infodemic." Is this really a task we want the government to tackle?
As a professor, Judge Barrett expressed a skepticism of Executive Power that is uncommon among Republican nominees.
The accusation is often made. But it simply isn't true.
The Judicial Conference is recommending additional judges for what is already the largest
Bonus fact: The majority opinion was written by a male judge, joined by three female judges (one of them a former sexual assault prosecutor). The dissent was written by a male judge.
The filibuster is not inherently a tool of oppression simply because segregationist politicians in the 1950s and '60s found it useful.
A burst of recent scholarship exploring the Originalist case for and against the nondelegation doctrine.
Americans likely learned very little about her judicial philosophy.
The results of facial recognition software might not be admissible evidence—but the police are allowed to use them to generate admissible evidence.
There's a fox, a goose, and a bag of grain. And a hippopotamus in the middle of the river.
Plus: DOJ sues over Melania Trump adviser's book, Justice Clarence Thomas wants to limit Section 230, and more....
The North American Butterfly Association will get the chance to press its Fifth Amendment claims against the Department of Homeland Security.
The Court adds an important Appointments Clause case to the docket.
Plus: Pandemic brings rise in electronic ankle monitoring, a court rules on stimulus checks for incarcerated people, and more...
Enforcement is supposed to be about protecting "consumer welfare." Overturning that goal would be bad for all of us.
Republicans understandably prepared for attacks on Barrett's faith which thankfully haven't materialized.
Ricky Dale Harrington is polling at 38 percent in a two-way race against one of the leading voices of the GOP's ascendant authoritarian nationalism.
There is little reason to think Barrett would vote to overturn the Affordable Care Act, which in any case seems legally secure.
Plus: $150,000+ in fines in NYC's first weekend of new shutdowns, California ballot-box confusion, and more...
After years of federal fiscal recklessness, is Washington's bill finally coming due?
The divided 2-1 decision is the first court of appeals ruling to rule on the legality of a key part of the funding diversion effort.
Mail-in ballots typically take days or sometimes weeks to be counted, so don't expect results on Election Night this year.
Giving one man control of all nuclear weapons is a mistake.
Plus: Tech companies respond, proposed H-1B visa changes, and more...
Two courts say COVID-19 lockdowns in Michigan and Pennsylvania were unconstitutional.
The original rules might not be found in the text.
It is an abrupt reversal for Trump, who as recently as Saturday had voiced his support for another stimulus package.
Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito worry about the future of religious freedom. That’s not the same as a call to overturn the decision.
The Supreme Court decides a decent number of environmental cases, but does not seem particularly interested in environmental concerns.
Whitmer helped spark a national debate over the limits of executive power.
Plus: Texas attorney general accused of bribery, Homeland Security wants credit reports on immigration sponsors, and more...
The court concludes that the ban is illegal in large part because the broad authority claimed by the president violates the nondelegation doctrine.
As more senators test positive for COVID-19, the ability of the Senate to conduct business is threatened.
A useful summary of how White Houses are not always forthcoming about medical issues afflicting Presidents.
The former vice president has a long history of reckless responses to the menaces du jour.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks