A Lawsuit Settlement Highlights Trump's Hypocrisy on Government Meddling With Social Media
Despite its rejection of the Biden administration's interference, the Trump administration is still asserting authority over online speech.
Despite its rejection of the Biden administration's interference, the Trump administration is still asserting authority over online speech.
Meta's loss in a New Mexico "product design" case could also be a blow against Section 230, free speech, and online privacy.
The justice dissented from the Supreme Court's denial of a petition from a Texas journalist who was charged with felonies for practicing journalism.
The lawsuit alleges that the city has a history of silencing pro-Palestine speech.
"We are not in the mood to discuss the matter further, and have not been in the mood for 250 years."
Ohio sheriff's deputies raided Afroman's house in 2022 based on a bogus tip, then sued the rapper after he released music videos mocking the deputies.
The First Amendment does not allow the FCC chairman to police news coverage.
Eight others were convicted on vague "terrorism" charges—causing serious concern among First Amendment advocates.
Yes, 6-year-old students have First Amendment rights, the 9th Circuit says.
"Freedom of speech and of press is accorded aliens residing in this country," according to a 1945 Supreme Court ruling.
The FCC chairman's reasoning is faulty.
More than eight decades ago, the Supreme Court invented a vague First Amendment exception that would-be censors continue to invoke.
Anthropic sues the federal government—and kicks off a debate about free speech for artificial intelligence systems.
Trump administration officials openly seek to punish the AI company for its corporate philosophy.
House and Senate committees were unfazed by the obvious First Amendment problems with the proposed Statewide Counterintelligence and Counterterrorism Unit.
A mayor and a police chief "mistook their authority to maintain order for a license to suppress criticism," says U.S. District Judge Stephanie Rose.
The Trump administration will start collecting social media account information on immigration forms.
A grand jury and a federal judge rejected the president’s vendetta against legislators who produced a video about the duty to refuse unlawful military orders.
A federal judge has set the date for the president's push to punish a news organization he dislikes, again.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon notes that Sen. Mark Kelly's comments about unlawful military orders were "unquestionably protected" by the First Amendment.
A lawsuit argues that Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem coerced Apple and Meta to censor two popular ICE-monitoring tools, which violates Americans' right to freedom of expression.
It was notable that the GOP members and witnesses made little effort to actually defend the legislation in question.
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
Rumeysa Ozturk is one of several international students targeted by the Trump administration's speech-based deportation policy.
I will be testifying against this proposed legislation - which would authorize exclusion or deportation of all or most non-citizen Muslim immigrants.
The commission has targeted the news rating company with onerous record demands and a merger condition aimed at cutting off its revenue.
The federal case against the former CNN anchor hinges on conduct that can plausibly be viewed as part of a journalist's work, combined with the obvious partiality of that work.
A federal indictment accuses him and another journalist of conspiring with protesters who disrupted a St. Paul church service.
FBI Director Kash Patel pays lip service to the First and Second Amendments while casting suspicion on people who exercise their First or Second Amendment rights.
Although Bovino is gone, immigration officials will continue to disregard rights and the rule of law under President Donald Trump.
In the first social media addiction case to reach a jury, K.G.M. claims TikTok, YouTube, and other platforms are responsible for her depression, anxiety, and poor self esteem.
Agents seized devices and data but already had what they needed to prosecute the leaker.
"Carrying a firearm is not a death sentence, it's a Constitutionally protected God-given right," writes Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.).
The video is the latest example of federal immigration authorities labeling anyone who opposes them a "domestic terrorist."
After Google refused to take down a video of him, the Kentucky senator suggested upending the legal framework undergirding the internet for three decades.
The state requires carry permit holders to obtain advance permission before bringing firearms into businesses.
FIRE condemned the police visit: "This blatant overreach is offensive to the First Amendment."
Excluding generative AI from Section 230 could stymie innovation and cut off consumers from useful tools.
The constitutionally anomalous status of broadcasting invites government meddling.
The incident raises more questions about federal agents' use-of-force policies and training.
It is hard to see how, since that question hinges on what happened the morning that an ICE agent shot her.
Every federal circuit court that has considered the issue, including the one covering Florida, has upheld a First Amendment right to monitor and record the police.
Mayday.Health ads that direct people to an informational website about abortion access are deceptive advertising and must be banned, the state argues. That’s unconstitutional, counters Mayday.
Ten Frenchmen were given fines, jail time, and social media bans for accusing their first lady of being a pedophilic gay man.
In an interview with Reason, CNN's Scott Jennings recounts the conversation he had with the tech entrepreneur about his distaste for exorbitant government spending.
"Violence is anything that threatens them and their safety, so it is doxing them, it's videotaping them where they're at when they're out on operations," Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said.
Despite their general ignorance of constitutional law, bears pose a much less grave threat to your civil liberties than humans do.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks