Should the Supreme Court Reconsider Keller v. State Board of California?
Do mandatory, integrated state bar associations violate the First Amendment? Two justices would like the Court to reconsider this question.
Do mandatory, integrated state bar associations violate the First Amendment? Two justices would like the Court to reconsider this question.
Sen. Chuck Grassley says it's dead because lawmakers feared upsetting the president.
The right's response to the coronavirus lockdowns brings out a longstanding American paradox.
Plus: unrest in Minneapolis, Twitter labels Trump tweet, and more...
It's great that Gov. Gavin Newsom is finally looking at costs and benefits. But don't kid yourself. None of it has anything to do with "science."
Weak reforms to the government’s power to secretly snoop on Americans wasn’t enough for the president. What happens next?
A flawed argument for judicial passivity in cases of government regulation.
A former Bush Administration Justice Department official responds to Judge Michael Luttig's critique of Judge Sullivan.
Sen. Wyden withdraws support for amendment due to fears it has been weakened too much.
The House will consider a surveillance reform proposal that failed in the Senate by just one vote.
A former federal judge (and Supreme Court short-lister) on what Judge Emmett Sullivan (and his critics) got right, and got wrong
The disease control agency is a poster child for bureaucratic incompetence.
The idea is not so far-fetched.
Following Georgia's ruling in favor of a lactation consultant, Pennsylvania’s high court reviews another “unreasonable” occupational licensing scheme.
A president who can attach his own new conditions to federal grants to states could use that power to undermine state autonomy on many issues - especially now that federal spending has been massively expanded during the coronavirus crisis.
The ruling says the state's top health official exceeded her statutory authority by ordering "nonessential" businesses to close.
Congress created inspectors general to be watchdogs, but it's too weak-willed to protect those watchdogs from retaliation.
A local judge has concluded the State Health Director likely exceeded her powers under the Ohio Constitution
John Baker and Robert Miller identify an alternative
Courts are beginning to recognize that public health powers, while broad, are not a blank check.
"We have long interpreted the Georgia Constitution as protecting a right to work in one's chosen profession free from unreasonable government interference."
An under-the-radar environmental lawsuit could provide the Supreme Court another opportunity to revive the nondelegation doctrine.
A new paper by Thomas Frampton suggests most recent commentary concerning the Michael Flynn prosecution gets it wrong.
In a brief exchange during a recent oral argument, the Justice suggested the Court should reconsider giving states "special solicitude" under Massachusetts v. EPA
Businesses need to be able to adjust to a world where COVID-19 remains an ongoing concern.
We submitted another strange bedfellows amicus brief on severability in the Texas ACA case.
A seemingly arcane dispute about administrative law has profound implications for the limits of public health authority.
An effort by Sen. Rand Paul to forbid warrantless investigation of citizens was soundly defeated.
The Supreme Court weighs the congressional subpoena power in Trump v. Mazars.
There is a difference between reporting facts that make the president uncomfortable and manufacturing facts to fit a preconceived view of him.
Why the Supreme Court can rule in favor of Congress in the Trump financial records cases without thereby giving Congress any unlimited power.
Do legislative subpoenas really need a limiting principle?
The new bill includes another round of stimulus checks for all Americans, funds additional coronavirus testing, and spends billions to bail out states and government agencies straining under pension debt.
There was a potentially pivotal exchange in today's Supreme Court oral argument over the House subpoenas seeking the President's financial records.
An amendment to a FISA renewal bill would let the FBI snoop on your online browser history.
Officials in six Pennsylvania counties say they will allow businesses to reopen without permission from the state government. Expect more of that.
Forcing Google to behave like a public utility would probably not serve the interests of those demanding that designation—or the rest of us.
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of a Louisiana law that requires physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at local hospitals.
The ability of Americans to buy meat in grocery stores is at risk due to serious supply-chain issues caused by COVID-19.
The federal government has done a terrible job managing the coronavirus. It doesn't deserve our labor.
A Reuters investigation reveals courts "growing tendency" to grant cops immunity from civil rights lawsuits.
An abuse of power that doesn't violate federal fraud statutes can still be an impeachable offense - and still violate other criminal law.
The federal courts start to grapple with COVID-19 shutdown orders.
The USPS has lost $78 billion since 2007, but could lose as much as $13 billion this year as the pandemic has crushed mail volume.
The 1961 speech by President Dwight Eisenhower foreshadowed the current government's response to COVID-19.
Why does it matter is a federal agency is independent of Presidential control? Ask the Department of Defense.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10