Would a National Lockdown Have Saved the U.S. From COVID-19?
A comparison of Texas and California suggests that legal edicts matter less than The New York Times thinks.
A comparison of Texas and California suggests that legal edicts matter less than The New York Times thinks.
Recent upward trends in cases and deaths seem to reflect virus transmission tied to holiday gatherings.
Good news from the latest Cancer Statistics 2021 report
He will count on future production to provide second doses.
The government must move quickly to approve a one-dose regimen for Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines.
Ramp up the vaccinations now!
It's not clear how long those hopeful trends will continue.
Centralization makes sense only if you ignore differences in local conditions—and trust the feds to make the right choices.
A year into the pandemic, politicians still have not digested the dangers of careless public health measures.
The evidence is limited and mixed, but data from New York, Minnesota, and California suggest that restaurants there account for a small share of infections.
The decision says the government failed to present any evidence of virus transmission in restaurants that follow COVID-19 precautions.
We could double the number of Americans vaccinated against COVID-19.
The justices emphasized that K-12 schools are currently scheduled to reopen after winter break.
Now we wait for the FDA to get around to approving it later this week.
The ban is "not a comment on the relative safety of outdoor dining," Mark Ghaly says, but part of the effort to keep people from leaving home.
San Mateo County Health Officer Scott Morrow, who supported last spring's stay-at-home orders, airs his misgivings about reviving that policy.
Press coverage of the pandemic tends to exaggerate risk and ignore encouraging information.
The vaccines are great news, but the winter still looks bleak.
Everyone has a right to dissent from the epidemiologists' contentment with the way things are now.
It's not like we're in the middle of a pandemic or anything, right?
Especially if the COVID-19 inoculations are deployed speedily and accepted widely.
The New York Times columnist misconstrues the issues at stake in the challenge to New York's restrictions on houses of worship.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo described his policy as a "fear-driven response," cut by a "hatchet" rather than a "scalpel."
By arbitrarily foreclosing relatively safe social and recreational options, politicians encourage defiance, resentment, and riskier substitutes.
Blood test study finds that only about 10 percent of Americans are immune to the virus.
After violating his own rules, California's governor offers deceitful excuses and announces new restrictions for the little people.
That makes the disease much deadlier than the seasonal flu but not nearly as deadly as modelers initially assumed.
The case gives SCOTUS another chance to enforce constitutional limits on disease control measures.
Legal responses to this fall's surge in new cases, like last spring's lockdowns, are frequently illogical and unscientific.
They help keep the disease from spreading, but they won't single-handedly keep the COVID-19 numbers from going up.
When "fundamental rights are restricted" during an emergency, he says, the courts "cannot close their eyes."
So far the president-elect's "expectation" is off by a factor of more than three, which does not bode well for his approach to the pandemic.
Unfortunately, COVID, COVID, COVID this winter is unlikely to be Fake News.
And there looks to be more good vaccine news coming.
The president's COVID-19 adviser is not always right, but at least he is attempting to describe reality.
Peaks and valleys, a fall peak, or a slow burn?
Even after adjusting for age and comorbidities, researchers in New York and England found large improvements in patient survival.
That claim is wildly implausible and contradicted by the president's suggestion that COVID-19 was never much of a threat.
COVID-19 Cases are increasing faster than is testing, and that's not "fake news."
The president claims success based on a completely implausible worst-case scenario, while his opponent projects more than 3,700 deaths a day.
That is much lower than the toll from unintentional injuries, cancer, or heart disease but higher than the loss attributed to suicide or homicide.
The findings suggest that people infected in Connecticut were 10 times as likely to die as people infected in Utah or Oregon.
Two courts say COVID-19 lockdowns in Michigan and Pennsylvania were unconstitutional.
Both sides in the debate about face masks make claims that are not justified by the scientific evidence.
In younger age groups, the estimated risk is substantially lower than the overall IFR for the seasonal flu.
And is their luck running out?