Two Cheers for Chief Justice Roberts on the Unitary Executive
Trump v. Slaughter is a big win; Trump v. Cook is embarrassing given the posture of the case as explained in the dissents.
Trump v. Slaughter is a big win; Trump v. Cook is embarrassing given the posture of the case as explained in the dissents.
Robby Soave and Amber Duke discuss the Supreme Court’s rulings on birthright citizenship and transgender athletes.
The Supreme Court has "no shortage of tools" to enforce the separation of powers, Justice Neil Gorsuch notes. "The only real question is whether we will use them."
Understanding Trump v. Barbara.
The Supreme Court extended presidential control over federal agencies. What could go wrong?
If the laws requiring such agencies to be independent are unconstitutional, it may be that very existence of those agencies is also now illegal.
Tensions between today's two major presidential removal power decisions.
In a pair of decisions on Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that presidents have full authority to fire heads of executive branch agencies—but that the Fed is different.
Marjorie Taylor Greene discusses the future of the Republican Party, the resurgence of democratic socialism, and why the political establishment always wins
As expected, the Supreme Court overturns Humphrey's Executor, but reaffirms the independence of the Federal Reserve.
A new chapter in the never-ending battle between centralized power and local control.
War making in "the power of a single man" is not what the Founders intended.
Prosecutors in New Jersey must disclose how the technology is used in criminal cases, the state’s Supreme Court ruled.
Extensive evidence indicates that the decision to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitian migrants was motivated by unconstitutional racial and ethnic discrimination. The Court's ruling on statutory issues also has flaws.
A dispensary owner believes Hawaii’s hemp regulations are unconstitutional. He’s suing to stop their enforcement, but the law may not be on his side.
Understanding the 6–3 decision in Mullin v. Doe.
Robby Soave and Jason Russell break down the socialist sweep in NYC, the latest in House of the Dragon, and the World Cup.
Democrats and Republicans alike dragged out the process to vote on the Iran war. Antiwar advocates say their vote still matters.
A democratic socialist who favors the eradication of Western civilization just won her primary.
Her plan to fix Social Security's fiscal flaws would ask workers to cover the full cost. Some Republicans are supporting it too.
Anthropic and OpenAI may not like current federal controls on their products, but it will be consumers who end up getting screwed.
Is the D.C. Circuit willing to allow "conservative" panel decisions on hot-button issues to stand? And is en banc review more than a way to ensure further review at One First Street?
Robby Soave and Amber Duke discuss the recent online feud between Rep. Ro Khanna and Elon Musk.
Understanding the stakes of Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections.
An unplanned encounter with a silly, arbitrary (and improving) liquor law
The conservative justice continues to wage a lonely legal crusade over the Commerce Clause.
Democrats may revive impeachment if they take Congress in November. Trump and his allies, meanwhile, want his two impeachments erased.
The court ruled the subpoenas were part of an unconstitutional effort to coerce Minnesota state and local governments into giving up their immigration "sanctuary" policies.
Here are the sketchy tactics California’s public health agency is using to convince towns and cities to ban tobacco sales.
Matt Mahon tried to chart a reform-minded path, but too often he came across as a mushy moderate in an election that will be determined by partisans.
Lawmakers should be blocking Trump's corporate socialism, not making it a permanent fixture.
A landmark win for the right to keep and bear arms in United States v. Hemani.
Leave it to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to divide the justices in an unusual way.
Understanding the stakes in Kian v. Florida
Studies repeatedly show the credits aren't worth the cost.
Because the agency has banned most peptides, products from overseas labs dominate the market. How does that protect Americans?
The recently reintroduced American Innovation and Choice Online Act is a departure from America’s current antitrust regime, not an improvement.
Government agencies would have to report communications and could be sued for bullying.
The proposal was nixed only after White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf explained why it was legally dubious.
Congress cannot sit by and hope for AI to fix the deficit.
How a four-decade-old dissent may now help the president fire independent federal agency heads at will
It’s long past time to open federal surveillance powers to scrutiny and reform.
Trump's failure to secure constitutionally required congressional authorization for his war with Iran helped ensure the US lacked the staying power necessary to prevail.
A guest post by Georgetown legal scholar Peter E. Harrell.
Platner is too typical of a wave of radical and unprepared Democrats who seem poised to take power.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.