Lawyers' Bar Journal Article Discussing Their AI-Hallucination Errors Doesn't Entirely Satisfy Judge, but …
the judge declines to issue sanctions, in part because “their expressions of repentance are made in good faith.”
the judge declines to issue sanctions, in part because “their expressions of repentance are made in good faith.”
"In an era of rampant unverified AI usage within the legal field, this case presents a prime example of the risk associated with serving as a rubberstamp when acting as local counsel."
opposing counsel had "directly and swiftly pointed the errors out to the trial court."
"How [plaintiff's lawyer] then could have blindly and solely trusted Claude to remedy the brief is difficult to fathom."
But the court is unanimous on the sanctions for the particular Assistant D.A. who was involved, and added: "We strongly encourage trial courts to carefully review proposed orders with the understanding that artificial intelligence software, with all of its potential risks and benefits, may have been used to prepare such proposed orders."
A new lawsuit claims that ChatGPT gave the shooter information about busy times on campus and how to use guns.
“Mr. Kachouroff's statements to the Court in this case do not inspire confidence.”
Remember: It could happen at your firm, too.
A lawyer's duties "do not disappear solely because an attorney chooses to outsource his labor to AI."
Plus: the Facebook verdicts, porn star chatbots, facial recognition gone awry, drag queen regulation, and more…
Tantaros is representing herself in a lawsuit against Fox and, among others, ex-Senator Scott Brown, alleging sexual harassment and other claims.
"It appears that the Court’s prior admonitions and sanctions have had little, if any, remedial impact."
with cameo appearance by out-of-jurisdiction counsel's citation of non-existent cases.
The Texas Court of Appeals just upheld the order.
Anthropic sues the federal government—and kicks off a debate about free speech for artificial intelligence systems.
The nonexistent cases were first introduced by opposing counsel, but the appellant's lawyer didn't spot the error at the trial court, and submitted a proposed order to the trial court that cited those cases. That, the appeals court held, meant that appellant forfeited the right to challenge the decision.
"Because Claude is not an attorney, that alone disposes of Heppner's claim of privilege."
A magistrate judge recommends a $10K sanction for a lawyer's repeated incorrect citations, and has some things to say about the pattern he has been seeing in his own court.
"which, even if it were true, is simply unacceptable by any measure of candor to any court."
The "filings have led to the Court completely losing trust in" the lawyers involved.
The claim is "iffy" partly because part of the plaintiff's argument is that ... ChatGPT said the award was likely AI-generated.
The firm, has "more than 1,600 attorneys in over 80 offices nationwide."
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.