Our New Amicus Brief in the Section 301 Tariff Case
The Cato Institute, Michael McConnell, and I filed an amicus brief in litigation challenging Trump's massive Section 301 tariffs, which use "forced labor" as a pretext for sweeping protectionism.
The Cato Institute, Michael McConnell, and I filed an amicus brief in litigation challenging Trump's massive Section 301 tariffs, which use "forced labor" as a pretext for sweeping protectionism.
Why the major questions and nondelegation doctrines bolster the legal case against Trump's Section 338 tariffs.
Facing a 25 percent tariff threat, Seoul agreed to bankroll nuclear reactors and a Texas gas plant. The cost is already climbing past budget.
Economists Stephen Moore and Scott Lincicome debate tariffs as a foreign policy tool.
Canada's retaliatory tariffs include the little metal band that holds an eraser onto a pencil.
By quickly endorsing Trump's ridiculous plan to bribe voters in the midterms, J.D. Vance reveals something about the future of Trumpism. There isn't one.
The brief explains why the Section 122 tariffs are illegal and run afoul of the major questions and nondelegation doctrines.
The move further escalates this harmful and illegal trade war with a vital ally.
The ban was accompanied by a new set of tariffs targeting Canadian motorboats, cheese, and other products in the latest expansion of an absurd trade war.
Plus: Capitalism blaming, desalination innovation, Houthis fire on Saudi Arabia, and more...
Labor Day is a great time to remember that we can make workers vastly better off by empowering more of them to vote with their feet, both within countries and through international migration.
Americans have been widening the prosperity gap with our neighbors for years.
Some Democrats are licking their chops over other economic powers that Trump has claimed for the presidency.
As the president liberalized the market for beef, he also imposed new 50 percent tariffs on some $20 billion worth of Canadian goods. Americans will suffer.
American consumers and businesses are being taken advantage of by Canadians who are…offering to sell us aluminum, oil, and wood? How?
U.S. tariffs hurt Americans. Retaliatory tariffs will hurt Canadians.
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi discuss tariffs, tech moral panics, social media harms, video games, Dolly Parton, Tim Curry, AI-written journalism, and America’s $40 trillion debt.
It will take more than three months to fix the problems plaguing the American beef industry.
Plus: Trump's trade war with Canada, the growing backlash against data centers, and calls to censor journalists in Britain
Canada is one of our largest trading partners. The president imposed 50 percent tariffs on cars, wigs, and hockey sticks.
Section 338 is a long-defunct part of the notorious Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930.
A bill to sanction Russia would allow the president to place 100 percent tariffs on goods from countries that buy Russian fossil fuels.
In one case after another, the president has tried to cut the courts out of the picture painted by the Framers.
A detailed Marquette Law School poll finds public views of the Court are modestly negative, but most major recent decisions enjoy majority public support.
An idea that's wildly out of tune at a time when Americans are trumpeting their worries about affordability.
The article explains why the new tariffs are harmful and illegal for many of same reasons as those invalidated by the Supreme Court.
The liberal justice wants the Supreme Court’s harshest progressive critics to chill out.
A guest post by Georgetown legal scholars Peter E. Harrell and Jennifer Hillman.
It's been more than eight years since Trump's first aluminum tariffs were imposed. How long do we have to wait before calling this a failure?
"There is no domestic alternative" for peppercorns grown in Zanzibar or herbs from the south of France, says Ori Zohar, the former Shark Tank contestant taking the administration to court.
The president’s protectionism has constituted the largest tax increase since 1993.
The president's latest round of broad import taxes, like the previous two, treats his statutory authority as an afterthought.
Economist David Hebert highlights an underappreciated danger of Trump's tariff mania. It's a serious problem, but one that can at least be mitigated.
The BLT—a delicious celebration of the power of markets—exemplifies political attacks on the free movement of goods and people.
It was filed by several businesses, including Learning Resources, Inc., which was also involved in the IEEPA tariff litigation.
The complaint explains why the tariffs violate the requirements of Section 301, and also run afoul of the major questions and nondelegation doctrines.
The Section 301 tariffs announced on Thursday overstep the powers granted by Congress and likely run afoul of the major questions doctrine.
Plus: House votes on war powers as Trump enters Iran war "revenge mode," Ted Cruz worries about AI, Marvel movies are planned through 2042, and more...
The new policy is based on sham investigations, and runs afoul of the major questions and nondelegation doctrine.
The U.S. economy is not a reality show. The Trump administration should stop acting like it is.
From rent control and Medicare for All to tariffs, politicians left and right are embracing policy ideas that have been repeatedly shown to not work.
The trade war caused exports to Canada to fall. Now, Trump is pointing to that fact to justify more tariffs.
The 50% tariffs on many Canadian imports are based on the long-defunct Section 338 of the notorious Smoot-Hawley tariff act.
Plus: new tariffs on Brazil, Trump's primetime address on election security, and the growing popularity of democratic socialism.
The idea is simultaneously harmful and illegal.
It's almost like there is no real underlying principle guiding the Trump administration's tariff policies.
From executive power to civil liberties, what to make of a momentous year at SCOTUS?
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.