The Economist Who Wants To Make the World Poorer
Thomas Piketty's plan is a comprehensive program for global managed decline dressed up in the language of climate justice and equality.
Thomas Piketty's plan is a comprehensive program for global managed decline dressed up in the language of climate justice and equality.
Now Katherin Youniacutt and Tammy Thompson are taking their fight to become licensed master social workers to the Texas Supreme Court.
The Faster Labor Contracts Act promises quicker union agreements, but it would let federal arbitrators impose contracts workers never approved.
"It's really important that people step back, look at economic history," says economist Donald Boudreaux. "They'll see that we prosper more the more economically free we are."
The Iran war and Trump's tariffs are pushing prices higher, and neither will be easy to undo.
A market-friendly ruling party, abundant energy, and ample talent could jumpstart a new tech hub in the Himalayas.
The president has repeatedly argued that courts have no business deciding whether his actions are legal.
The ruling relies in part on the Supreme Court's decision in the tariff case.
Rep. Ro Khanna's minimum wage proposal promises prosperity but would likely price many low-skilled workers out of the labor market.
Behind Japan's economic success lies a government and legal system that clearly prioritize social stability and group harmony over individual rights.
The economic fallout of the law has been significant. Is it even legal?
With cigarettes costing around $40 a pack, Australia’s war on smoking has become a case study in how prohibitionist policies create black markets, violence, and criminal power.
The administration has paid $20 billion in refunds. Now, it is asking a federal appeals court to limit which businesses will get the rest.
Vermont passed single-payer legislation in 2011 and abandoned the plan after three years of failure. Why?
The Department of the Interior embraces its inner statism by banning conservation groups from leasing public land.
They appear to be yet another illegal power grab, one that should be challenged in court.
The state requires that people prove certain businesses are needed. How to do that is another question entirely.
Even as the White House backs away from its foolish tariff plans, the Trump administration keeps revealing why it should never have had these powers in the first place.
In Roanoke, Virginia, one entrepreneur’s dream ran into permit rules, taxes, Prohibition-era alcohol rules, and a city order to spend $10,000 on a “historic” dry-cleaning sign.
Plus: the Democratic Party's candidate problem, property tax breaks for seniors, and the UFC on the White House lawn
The Great American Cotton Plan will shell out millions in taxpayer funds, continuing the Trump administration’s pattern of paying off industries harmed by the president’s economic policies.
The only winning move is not to play. But if you must, a new book offers some suggestions.
They claim the injunction requiring refunds cannot be universal, and can only apply to those businesses who filed lawsuits seeking recovery.
Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy says that capitalism is killing youth hockey and fueling a "crisis of resentment." But who exactly is pissed?
After nine months of murdering suspected cocaine smugglers, the Trump administration has no evidence that the strategy is working as advertised.
The U.S. Treasury is trying to fight the kind of trade embargo that it usually imposes on other countries.
Unionized state workers say agencies need to study the additional emissions that would be caused by requiring employees to come into the office four days a week.
Alvin Roth, Nobel Memorial Prize–winning economist, wants us to think more about how controversial freedoms can become commonplace.
If the government does not reduce the cost of public services, then a special tax break for one group merely forces everyone else to pick up the slack.
Though some of their products may have been redirected elsewhere, American farmers are likely eating most of the losses.
A 2024 paper claimed higher minimum wages don't kill jobs. It was statistically significant—and almost certainly misleading.
Nobel Prize-winning economist Alvin E. Roth discusses the moral limits of markets, how bans create black markets, and why harm reduction often works better than prohibition.
A new Bears stadium and Gov. J.B. Pritzker himself stand to gain if the legislation passes.
He famously said the Founders had created "a republic, if you can keep it." How have we kept it? And can we continue?
I watched hours and hours of the Enhanced Games so you didn’t have to.
Objectivism in Turkey has risen and fallen in recent decades, but is newly rejuvenated.
The surprising move saves taxpayers from a steep bill—for now.
Law professor Natasha Sarin debates the Cato Institute's Adam Michel.
I gave the talk earlier this week.
A Minnesota senator got fined for insider trading on a prediction market. His response was to ban the platforms for everyone in the state.
A 10 percent ownership cap was supposed to prevent monopolies in Missouri's marijuana market. Instead, the state's licensing regime may have created a blueprint for companies to build one.
They cost each American household roughly $1,000 in 2025, with more coming in 2026.
The decision means the injunction blocking collection of the tariffs will not be blocked while litigation continues.
British supermarkets already operate on thin margins, but politicians are treating their prices as if they were arbitrary.
Johan Norberg discusses what makes societies prosperous, why protectionism and nostalgia keep returning, and how populism feeds cultural decline.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks