In Scathing Rulings, Federal Courts Block Arkansas and Texas Age Verification Laws
Plus: Meta revises controversial "dangerous organizations" policy, a win against civil asset forfeiture in Detroit, and more...
Plus: Meta revises controversial "dangerous organizations" policy, a win against civil asset forfeiture in Detroit, and more...
Republican-controlled Huntington Beach has sued the state government to stop enforcement of state housing mandates.
A cabinet minister who once defended the right to blaspheme now wants a crackdown.
Among other things, "Default judgment will be entered against Giuliani as a discovery sanction ..., holding him civilly liable on plaintiffs' defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, civil conspiracy, and punitive damage claims ...."
Americans support tighter laws, but not as much as they distrust government and like owning guns.
People should be free to choose how cautious to be. Mask mandates, lockdowns, and closing schools won't stop the virus.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit takes issue with how the FDA evaluated Fontem's unflavored vaping products.
The Biden Administration is revising the rules for how agencies conduct cost-benefit analyses, and some CBA experts have expressed concerns.
The state has filed a motion to set an execution date for Kenneth Eugene Smith, who survived a previous execution attempt.
Plus: The real message behind DeSantis' abortion anecdote, midwives sue over Alabama regulations, and more…
can go forward, says a federal court.
Applicants are currently waiting 10 to 13 weeks for routine processing.
"This appeal raises a question not yet addressed by any California court: whether a public official may be bribed with a promise to donate to the official's office."
Plus: A listener question about the continued absurdity of sports stadium subsidies
On September 5, the Keystone State is removing a big barrier to health care.
"[T]he Government argue[d] that when considering that the charged offenses occurred after the acquittal, the [appellant's] tactics were emboldened and this factor weighs in favor of admissibility."
"Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i) ... commands that the court must address the defendant personally to afford him the chance to speak or present evidence in mitigation."
Banks routinely snitch on customers and even deny services to people politicians don’t like.
A Texas judge ordered that the airline submit to training on the rights of religious believers after losing a religious discrimination lawsuit.
An interesting empirical study looks at whether better briefs lead to better outcomes.
The hospital baselessly claimed the teenager's mother wrote the petition after she was fired without cause.
A federal court rejects challengers' Free Exercise Clause and parental rights claims.
Mug shots are not taken to humiliate a defendant before they've been convicted. But that's the purpose they widely serve now.
The opinion was decided July 21, but was originally issued sealed; it was just unsealed today, in response to my motion to unseal.
Season 1, Episode 4 Podcasts
"You need an argument for why this is good for society. That's important, but you also need money."
In last night's Republican presidential debate, candidates floated various forms of military action against drug cartels.
Legislators abuse the emergency label to push through spending that would otherwise violate budget constraints.
Further debate on textualism, "common good constitutionalism," and the classical legal method.
An emergency proclamation by Gov. Josh Green offers developers the opportunity to route around almost all regulations on building homes.
Plus: GOP hopefuls debate tonight, Canadian link tax backfires, and more...
A report reveals new draconian restrictions the 2024 frontrunner wants to implement, such as sea blockades in Latin America and "ideological screening" for migrants.
My amicus brief to the Third Circuit argues that the district court appropriately sanctioned the Philadelphia D.A.'s Office for making misleading representations about whether they had conferred with a crime victims' family.
Geoffrey Swenson’s book Contending Orders tackles Afghanistan and Timor-Leste.
While chalking on D.C. sidewalks and streets is illegal, the protesters say they were targeted for their beliefs.
While there is some genuine politicization, it is not as great as often claimed. Proposals to undermine judicial review could easily end up empowering the very sort of authoritarian president progressives fear.
Expect more strikes, fewer government services, and more tax increases to pay for pension obligations.
The guidelines would ignore decades of academic findings about how firm concentration can have a positive impact on consumers' welfare.
A fascinating new exploration of Frederick Douglass' constitutional thought.
S.B. 423 would prevent the state's powerful Coastal Commission from shooting down affordable housing projects that comply with local zoning laws.
Plus: Court urged to stop Arkansas' social media age verification law from taking effect in September, legalizing medical marijuana linked to lower insurance premiums, and more...