California Judge Blocks Enforcement of State and Local Bans on Restaurant Dining in San Diego County
The decision says the government failed to present any evidence of virus transmission in restaurants that follow COVID-19 precautions.
The decision says the government failed to present any evidence of virus transmission in restaurants that follow COVID-19 precautions.
We could double the number of Americans vaccinated against COVID-19.
The justices emphasized that K-12 schools are currently scheduled to reopen after winter break.
Now we wait for the FDA to get around to approving it later this week.
The ban is "not a comment on the relative safety of outdoor dining," Mark Ghaly says, but part of the effort to keep people from leaving home.
San Mateo County Health Officer Scott Morrow, who supported last spring's stay-at-home orders, airs his misgivings about reviving that policy.
Press coverage of the pandemic tends to exaggerate risk and ignore encouraging information.
It's not like we're in the middle of a pandemic or anything, right?
The New York Times columnist misconstrues the issues at stake in the challenge to New York's restrictions on houses of worship.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo described his policy as a "fear-driven response," cut by a "hatchet" rather than a "scalpel."
By arbitrarily foreclosing relatively safe social and recreational options, politicians encourage defiance, resentment, and riskier substitutes.
Blood test study finds that only about 10 percent of Americans are immune to the virus.
After violating his own rules, California's governor offers deceitful excuses and announces new restrictions for the little people.
That makes the disease much deadlier than the seasonal flu but not nearly as deadly as modelers initially assumed.
The case gives SCOTUS another chance to enforce constitutional limits on disease control measures.
Legal responses to this fall's surge in new cases, like last spring's lockdowns, are frequently illogical and unscientific.
When "fundamental rights are restricted" during an emergency, he says, the courts "cannot close their eyes."
So far the president-elect's "expectation" is off by a factor of more than three, which does not bode well for his approach to the pandemic.
Unfortunately, COVID, COVID, COVID this winter is unlikely to be Fake News.
And there looks to be more good vaccine news coming.
The president's COVID-19 adviser is not always right, but at least he is attempting to describe reality.
Peaks and valleys, a fall peak, or a slow burn?
Even after adjusting for age and comorbidities, researchers in New York and England found large improvements in patient survival.
That claim is wildly implausible and contradicted by the president's suggestion that COVID-19 was never much of a threat.
The president claims success based on a completely implausible worst-case scenario, while his opponent projects more than 3,700 deaths a day.
That is much lower than the toll from unintentional injuries, cancer, or heart disease but higher than the loss attributed to suicide or homicide.
The findings suggest that people infected in Connecticut were 10 times as likely to die as people infected in Utah or Oregon.
Two courts say COVID-19 lockdowns in Michigan and Pennsylvania were unconstitutional.
Both sides in the debate about face masks make claims that are not justified by the scientific evidence.
In younger age groups, the estimated risk is substantially lower than the overall IFR for the seasonal flu.
And is their luck running out?
If only that signaled a broader respect for legal limits on executive power.
Government officials think Americans can't handle the truth, an assumption that tends to backfire.
The comparison between Sweden and the U.S. casts doubt on the importance of broad legal restrictions.
The trends suggest that Sweden's less restrictive policy has been more successful at reducing fatal outcomes.
A week after being sued over his arbitrary COVID-19 policy, Gov. Charlie Baker says he will allow arcades to reopen.
A federal lawsuit argues that the distinction drawn by Massachusetts is unconstitutional.
If the goal is minimizing the death toll over the long run, it is too soon to say.
"Economists are accustomed to thinking about tradeoffs," says economist and Nobel laureate Alvin Roth. "It appears that at least in some parts of the ethics community, they are not."
67 percent say they would get vaccinated as soon as an inoculation becomes available.
The risk for the elderly is much higher, probably largely because of preexisting medical conditions.
The assertion, which contradicts the president's own warnings about the virus, is based on a misinterpretation of CDC data.
A new study suggests that a second higher wave of infections can be avoided.
The New York Times thinks so, but the data do not fit that hypothesis very well.
The rhetoric may not be accurate, but it is definitely useful.
The coronavirus pandemic has ushered in an age of sloppy, inaccurate journalism and a heightened need for media literacy.
The study suggests that vaping raises your risk of catching the disease, but only if you stop.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10