Pennsylvania State Trooper Suing To Get Right to Bear Arms in Private Capacity Back
Prohibited by federal and state law from owning a firearm because of a previous involuntary commitment.
Prohibited by federal and state law from owning a firearm because of a previous involuntary commitment.
The ruling also rejects an "assault weapon" ban, caliber restrictions for long guns, a heavy handgun tax, and registration requirements.
That scary 105 accidental gun death figure, more than five times the previous year? Turns out to really be 5, slightly more than a quarter of the previous year.
Clinton and Trump agree on a fantasy of presidential power to keep guns out of bad hands in a manner that would be effective, constitutional, and not harass the innocent more than stop the guilty. It can't be done.
'No fly, no buy' rears its unconstitutional head at the debate.
Did a marketing campaign trick Americans into loving firearms?
The gun gender gap is growing smaller.
Prior restraint keeps blueprints off the Internet.
Fear mongering, despite the pretenses, is a bipartisan project.
Gun rights groups argue that the District of Columbia's restrictions on self-defense outside the home violate the Second Amendment.
Citing "a strong link between drug use and violence," the appeals court says it's reasonable to stop patients from buying guns.
Two grams of marijuana reportedly recovered.
Also, demonstrators carried sex toys around UT Austin to protest the law.
Forget stories of restrictive laws; predators have easy access to weapons, but honest people can get into trouble for defending themselves.
Lawsuit insists a combination of restrictions against both open and concealed carry of weapons in the state constitute a Second Amendment violation.
Make love, not liberty? Students urge the state to protect "cocks not glocks" on campus.
The billionaire blabbermouth is right about his Democratic opponent's hostility to gun rights.
But not for long, I bet.
Their platform and their presidential nominee disdain the constitutional right to arms.
On August 1, 1966, armed civilians prevented a mass shooter from claiming even more victims.
Just a string of policies that would waste time and money, create a pointless new class of contraband, and rob many innocents of self-defense.
Activists alienate potential allies in the fight against police abuse by perpetuating myths.
The omission is consistent with Hillary Clinton's disdain for the right to armed self-defense.
A governor cannot and should not simply suspend laws.
Doesn't care if suspending open-carry is constitutional; fortunately Gov. Kasich does.
The police got militarized to fight drugs. If you thought the drug war was racist, how do you think the gun war will look?
The use of a "bomb robot" to take down a suspect appears to be a new police tactic.
"Exercising our right to bear arms should not translate to a death sentence over something so trivial as a traffic stop for a broken tail light, and we are going to watch this case with a magnifying glass."
The Bullet Button Reloaded disables the magazine release until the rifle is opened.
Voters will have 16 other issues to consider Election Day.
Sterling had been selling CDs outside a supermarket; police had responded to a call that a man matching his description had pointed a gun.
One bill the California governor signed will require uncompensated destruction, sale, or confiscation of existing peacefully owned magazines with a capacity of larger than 10.
Not looking to go hard on themselves, just on your rights
Both sides want to chip away at your civil liberties, even if sometimes they argue about it.
The Supreme Court rules 6-2 in Voisine v. United States.
The Terrorist Firearms Prevention Act relies on an FBI standard we are not allowed to know.
The Orlando massacre shows the folly of fighting a decentralized terrorism model with centralization.
If the government can take away our natural rights to travel and self-defense, can other fundamental rights be far behind?
Still shamelessly exploiting emotions without regard to the dangerous consequences.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks