The DOGE Daze of Regulatory Reform
Why Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are overestimating the extent to which the administrative state can be brought to heel through Presidential fiat.
Why Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are overestimating the extent to which the administrative state can be brought to heel through Presidential fiat.
The Federal Trade Commission's antitrust action does not benefit grocery shoppers.
Plus: New York City moves forward on zoning reforms, Utah city moves backward on granny flats, and D.C. considers a ban on landlords' pit bull bans.
It looks like we can expect the antitrust assaults to continue.
Joe Biden ran on some good ideas to reform policing and incarceration, which he mostly failed to deliver.
From the war in Afghanistan to the war on drugs, Reason writers offer performance reviews of Joe Biden's single term as president.
By picking a former aide to J.D. Vance as the next head of the Department of Justice's antitrust division, Trump sends a worrying signal.
The Yakama Nation has won a temporary restraining order preventing the City of Toppenish, Washington, from closing its new cold weather shelter.
Here's how expiring tax cuts could affect you.
The final version of New York's "City of Yes" reforms makes modest liberalizing changes to the city's zoning code.
Flawed calculations and overlooked benefits show why Trump's immigration plan would be a fiscal disaster for America.
The Department of Justice's recommended remedies will only harm consumers.
Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan used the state to achieve political aims that have nothing to do with keeping markets competitive. J.D. Vance has said she's done "a good job."
If confirmed, Chris Wright and Gov. Doug Burgum will have the opportunity to prioritize innovation and deregulation to the benefit of taxpayers and the environment.
With the help of New York’s environmental review law, local NIMBYs halted an approved housing project, adding to delays and costs in a city facing a housing shortage.
Plus: Democrats' housing-lite postelection recriminations and yet another ballot box defeat for pro–rent control forces in California.
If advertisers don’t want to give data to Facebook Marketplace, they shouldn’t advertise on Facebook.
Even with burgeoning private sector support, nuclear can’t thrive without regulatory reform.
Having a large market share may just mean that a company is really good at what it does.
When money comes down from the DOT, it has copious strings attached to it—strings that make infrastructure more expensive and less useful.
Justice Gorsuch shows more interest in property rights challenges than his colleagues on the Court.
The First Circuit's ruling is another blow to the consumer welfare standard.
Environmental Protection Agency
Lee Zeldin’s legal prowess may lead to a shrinking of the administrative state.
Will the mercurial tech mogul put his thumb on the scale to help his own companies, or will he push for a broader deregulatory agenda?
Golden State voters decisively rejected progressive approaches to crime and housing.
As skyrocketing costs and mass exoduses define the Golden State, Democrats face a crucial reckoning.
Plus: Land acknowledgements, New York's migrant expenditures, and more...
Supposedly targeted at immigrants and travelers, the program endangers everybody’s liberty.
Much of the detail remains to be worked out, but lawmakers and corporations are already preparing.
Despite decades of bipartisan attempts, industrial policy keeps failing to deliver on promises from both the left and the right.
Under Khan's leadership, the Federal Trade Commission has been bad for business and bad for consumers.
In the Abolish Everything issue, Reason writers make the case for ending the Fed, the Army, Social Security, and everything else.
A ballot initiative to create a new category of medical providers for animals is winning approval, though votes are still being counted.
A related initiative preventing the state's most prolific rent control–supporting nonprofit from funding future initiatives is headed for a narrow victory.
Victory in the fight for cheaper housing, a more liberal land-use regime, and greater property rights won't come from the White House.
We don't know how Kamala Harris would wield her awesome power, and we don't know how the rule of law would constrain Donald Trump.
Voters say they want to "stop the madness." Expect the madness to continue.
In this Texas Law Review article, Josh Braver and I argue that most exclusionary zoning violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
No matter who wins, we can expect bad policies surrounding sex and especially surrounding technology.
These two candidates can't even be trusted to explain their own ideas.
California would benefit from building more housing and having more experimentation with how public services are delivered.
Links to all my writings on these topics.
Dave Smith is for Trump. Jacob Grier is for Harris. David Stockman says we're screwed either way.
Plus: Kamala Harris' closing argument, the FTC's harassment of Musk-owned Twitter, and more
Proposition 33 would repeal all of California's state-level limits on rent control. It's passage could prove to be a disaster for housing supply in the Golden State.
For decades, the Jones Act has increased costs and hurt grid reliability in Puerto Rico.
A new IMF study finds that a global increase in tariffs could decrease global GDP by nearly 1 percent by 2025 and over 1 percent by 2026.
From taxes to special loans to price gouging, the Trump and Harris campaigns have engaged in a race to see who can pander hardest.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10