Australia Offers a Terrifying Vision of an Internet Without Section 230
What happens when YouTube and Facebook can be held liable for their users’ speech?
What happens when YouTube and Facebook can be held liable for their users’ speech?
Though some of the worst misinformation is coming from abroad.
Denmark recently lifted all COVID mandates. The U.S. should do the same.
This is where government demands to moderate what users say will ultimately lead.
The government is ignoring the costs of lockdowns—for lives, for liberty, and for the economy.
Here’s why Section 230 is so important.
Without a Bill of Rights, the land down under quickly goes where America may eventually follow.
Plus: ACLU identity crisis, Texas bans vaccine rules, and more...
Congress should rue the day it hopped on the kangaroo-meat ban.
Big outlets get subsidies. The government still gets to pick winners and losers.
This tech/media fight down under is not about democracy or monopolies. It’s about ad revenue.
Plus: The FDA approves a new rapid at-home COVID-19 test, lockdowns in Victoria, Australia ruled a human rights abuse, and more...
If the new trustbusters get their way, tech platforms might be forced to pay money to traditional news outlets for the privilege of linking to their content.
Will the U.S. be next?
The country's response to Hong Kong residents fleeing the national security law was modest, yet still drew the ire of Chinese officials.
The Australian series shows it’s not all about Trump.
Online censorship is coming, and it’s going to be bad news for everybody.
"I would rather be remembered for writing something that was...offensive, than to be forgotten for writing something bloodless."
It’s all part of the international push by officials to monitor the public. You’re next.