Some Jobs Are More Equal Than Others
All professions deserve the same constitutional protections that speech-heavy industries get.
All professions deserve the same constitutional protections that speech-heavy industries get.
"I've lost everything," says Vicki Baker.
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson denied qualified immunity to the officers involved in Patterson v. United States.
What to expect from Joe Biden’s pick for attorney general.
The unfolding legal saga of City of Hayward v. Stoddard-Nunez
Abrasive, tasteless, and uncompromising, Flynt undoubtedly made the world safer for speech of all varieties.
In 2014, Reason reported on the misbehavior of Rod Ponton, who has suddenly risen to internet stardom after being unable to turn off an adorable filter during an online legal case.
Fourth Amendment advocates prevail in Wingate v. Fulford.
The state used civil asset forfeiture to seize Tyson Timbs' car in 2013. His nightmare hasn't ended.
The warden at the center of the case was originally given qualified immunity.
A federal court said it did not violate her Fourth Amendment rights.
Justice Clint Bolick dissents in Arizona v. Mixton.
The Biden administration has just delivered its first disappointment to criminal justice reform advocates.
The incoming president can bring some much-needed professional diversity to the federal bench.
Is the chief justice just a politician in robes?
The Constitution “plainly makes the appointment of electors a state-by-state matter.”
A tentative decision from Los Angeles Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant is yet another rebuke of officials trying to reimpose March-style lockdowns on a skeptical public.
The PACER database is antiquated and expensive to access, and that's just the way the federal judiciary likes it.
The president and his allies keep losing election cases.
Is this the Supreme Court’s next big gun rights case?
The legal doctrine provides rogue government agents cushy protections not available to the little guy.
Garland’s judicial record is replete with deferential votes for police and prosecutors.
The legal doctrine is a free pass for rampant government abuse.
The newest lawsuit in Pennsylvania is a longshot attempt to argue that all mail-in voting is unconstitutional because it differs from traditional, in-person voting. It's likely to fail.
Americans likely learned very little about her judicial philosophy.
An appeals court upheld a rule by the Ohio Secretary of State to limit each county to just one ballot box, overturning a previous ruling that said more boxes were needed.
Plus: Pandemic brings rise in electronic ankle monitoring, a court rules on stimulus checks for incarcerated people, and more...
Whitmer helped spark a national debate over the limits of executive power.
If confirmed, she would cement a strong 6-3 conservative majority.
Even the most police-skeptical courts grant the doctrine in egregious circumstances.
"I believe there is sufficient evidence of a clearly established Fourth Amendment violation," writes the dissenting judge.
Tennessee's requirement that barbers have at least a high school education is "unconstitutional, unlawful, and unenforceable," ruled the state's Chancery Court.
"The Constitution says everyone is entitled to equal protection of the law—even at the hands of law enforcement," wrote Judge Carlton W. Reeves.
The Department of Homeland Security announced in court that it would pull the contentious directive.
The chief justice has managed to infuriate every major political faction.
"Supreme Court jurisprudence...is heavily weighted against you," an appeals judge told state prosecutors last week.
And no, it wasn't the shoplifter's home.
Hold agencies and regulators accountable for outcomes, not compliance.
Interactions between the public and the police should be kept to a minimum.
It's a perverse kind of progress, but it's progress all the same.
“Officers don’t have the time to pull out law books and analyze the fine points of judicial precedent.”
A flawed argument for judicial passivity in cases of government regulation.
The idea is not so far-fetched.
Following Georgia's ruling in favor of a lactation consultant, Pennsylvania’s high court reviews another “unreasonable” occupational licensing scheme.
The federal courts start to grapple with COVID-19 shutdown orders.
In a 2-1 decision sure to provoke substantial debate, a court concludes that states are obligated to provide citizens with a certain degree of education.
Bogus lawsuits threaten medical professionals who are fighting on the front lines against COVID-19.
Legal scholars Lindsay Wiley and Steve Vladeck explain why courts should not give special deference to the government in cases challenging the constitutionality of anti-coronavirus policies.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks