Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s six-year prison sentence and lifetime political ban mark a historic victory for accountability—and a public eager to believe that no one is above the law.
Despite the setback, Middletown Township is taking the case to the state supreme court.
When Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick is worried about our constitutional order, we should all pay heed.
Marcy Rheintgen was the first person to be arrested for trying to challenge Florida's bathroom bill. The case against her has been tossed out.
The lawsuit is a win not just for Anthropic, but for all users of large language models.
“Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch,” declared Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
The liberal justice faults the majority for leaving deportees to “suffer violence in far-flung locales.”
No matter how John O'Keefe died, the government failed here on multiple levels.
Although the appeals court said the president probably complied with the law he invoked to justify his California deployment, it emphasized that such decisions are subject to judicial review.
Plus: The Supreme Court upholds a state ban on transgender care for minors.
A religious group using psilocybin mushrooms in ceremonies "put the State of Utah's commitment to religious freedom to the test," a federal judge wrote.
Plus: When Stalin Meets Star Wars.
Law enforcement seized Robert Reeves' Chevrolet Camaro without charging him with a crime. After he filed a class-action lawsuit, that changed.
The case against Michelino Sunseri exemplifies the injustice caused by the proliferation of regulatory crimes—the target of a recent presidential order.
The court ruled on Thursday that a heterosexual woman shouldn't have to clear a higher bar than a gay colleague to sue for discrimination.
Plus: A love letter to the heavy metal band Slayer.
The MAGA loyalty that Trump demands is anathema to everything that originalism is supposed to be about.
Both are wins for free trade, but only one vindicates the separation of powers.
For both practical and constitutional reasons, this is the obvious way out of the chaos Trump's tariffs have created.
The federal courts are supposed to be a bulwark against presidential overreach, not a rubber stamp.
Plus: Javier Milei puts state-run TV to good use, Texas' THC antagonism, rent control lunacy, and more...
No. One of the judges in Wednesday's unanimous ruling was a Trump appointee, and the ruling rested on important legal and constitutional principles.
The Court of International Trade ruled that Trump's emergency economic powers do not include the authority to impose tariffs on nearly all imports.
The next generation of online platforms is being shaped less by engineers and entrepreneurs and more by regulators and courts—and they’re very bad at it.
Two decades after Granholm v. Heald was supposed to end protectionist shipping laws, states and lower courts continue to undermine the decision.
Are human courts the best venue to protect wild animals?
The legal principle safeguards civil liberties, protecting even unpopular people from the government.
For nearly three years, Daniel Horwitz faced contempt of court for talking about a private prison that was one of his most frequent courtroom opponents.
But the ruling suggests prostitution clients could be convicted of sex trafficking in other circumstances.
Stephen Miller's understanding of the Constitution is dubious for several reasons.
The late justice was appointed by a Republican but quickly established himself as a judicial liberal.
Some hospitals are even reporting women for testing positive for drugs that were given to them during labor.
Ozturk's continued detention "potentially chills the speech of the millions and millions of people in this country who are not citizens," said U.S. District Judge William K. Sessions III.
The Trump administration is desperate to avoid judicial review.
A Supreme Court case could determine whether Americans own their digital data—or whether the government can take that information without a warrant.
Campus protests against Israel have revived debates over the limits of First Amendment protections.
The Wisconsin judge is charged with obstruction of justice and concealing an undocumented alien to prevent his arrest.
It’s a small step in the right direction for self-defense rights.
Earlier this month, 4,700 foreign students were at risk of detainment after ICE inexplicably terminated their visa records.
The memo says "Alien Enemies" aren't subject "to a judicial review of the removal in any court of the United States."
Small businesses and a dozen states have filed a pair of lawsuits challenging Trump's authority to impose tariffs on board games, clothes, and lots of other things.
An immigration judge found the official document initiating Kseniia Petrova’s deportation to be legally deficient. She remains in detention, unable to further her cancer research.
The temporary restraining order allows time to challenge burdensome reporting requirement.
A federal judge in Colorado rules against the Trump administration.
To remain independent, institutions of higher education should end their reliance on taxpayer money.
Plus: Democrats visit El Salvador, Taiwan invasion possibilities, Hayek on rule of law, and more...
In Justice Abandoned, a law professor argues that the Court got these key decisions wrong.
Sentencing defendants based on acquitted conduct violates basic notions of justice.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
