Alabama Draws on Supreme Court's New Abortion Decision To Justify Trans Youth Treatment Ban
Alabama's attorney general argues such medical transitioning is not rooted in America’s history and therefore not constitutionally protected.
Alabama's attorney general argues such medical transitioning is not rooted in America’s history and therefore not constitutionally protected.
If Europe really cared about e-waste it would stop mandating inefficient products.
Another proposed ban shows the true motivations of the culture war.
Nearly two dozen towns that had said no to legal weed shops are reconsidering.
Both argue that the bills open the state up to costly lawsuits for very little, if any, gain.
“We believe in parents' rights and that the best decisions regarding medical treatment options for children are made by parents.”
You are not for school choice or parents’ rights when you try to ban race and LGBT subjects in private education.
ACLU: “The agency’s new rule substitutes parents’ judgment as to what medical care is in the best interests of their children for the judgment of the government.”
A House Energy Subcommittee Hearing entertains dangerous and disingenuous rhetoric against technologies for freedom.
No, we don't need more anti-alcohol laws—no matter how rowdy the bachelorette parties get.
Protecting citizens from intrusive government surveillance is a virtue well worth signaling.
After San Francisco approved a similar ban, teen smoking rates increased.
Instead of trusting the science, the FDA will treat adults like children.
Government and the media aren't paying attention to the relative benefits of vaping over smoking tobacco.
It's not "freedom" to tell business owners they have to let unvaccinated people onto their premises.
A blanket ban on medical procedures for minors is not a prescription for human liberty.
The winners in every battle over restrictions are the people who do whatever they please without regard for government officials.
Maybe California will figure out how to keep the lights on by then.
There’s nothing good about censoring communication platforms citizens want to use.
The good news is that Boston has just barred law enforcement from using facial recognition technology.
This unilateral executive action has been scrutinized by both Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and U.S. District Judge Brantley Starr.
If only everybody weren’t stuck in their homes.
"Facial recognition represents a dystopic advancement of the police state."
Law enforcement betrayed the trust of gun owners who were doing their best to comply with government-mandated confiscation.
Can't buy it? That's okay, you can easily get the pieces to build one yourself.
When the human condition resists perfection through legislation, the answer always seems to be more—and stupider—laws.
The city is banning e-cigarettes while actual cigarettes remain legal.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.