Government officials keep trying to make us expose our data to them—and the criminals who ride on their coattails.
How the press learned to stop worrying and love censorship.
"We need to stop this generation of big tech companies from profiting off of lies to the American people," the candidate told PEN America.
Online platforms would have to "earn" speech protections by compromising encryption—all in the name of fighting child porn.
Biden tells the New York Times he would revoke Section 230 protections and hold Facebook (and other sites) liable for their content.
Gutting the trade deal would make it easier to strip our speech protections here at home.
Since FOSTA passed in 2018, "sex workers have faced increased violence" and "have been forced onto the streets," the California congressman says.
The answer to real and imagined problems is always spend more, regulate more.
The presidential hopeful on Thursday released a plan to regulate tech giants.
In comments to CNN on Monday night, Biden expressed a willingness to smash Section 230 in order to settle a feud his campaign is having with Facebook. That's a terrible idea.
Plus: The ACLU sues the FBI, divorce rates are at 40-year low, and more...
Gutting Section 230 would make it harder to track drug deals, not easier.
For once, the Trump administration is on the right side of a debate with Congress over trade.
The cases hinges on two laws—FOSTA and Section 230—that have been hotly contested in recent years.
The bad news is he's a congressman now. And he's trying to stomp all over Section 230 in order to attack home-sharing apps.
Four myths about the law that made the modern internet possible.
It flies in the face of precedent.
Plus: 8chan called before Congress, data privacy bill hits a snag, and more...
The Missouri senator thinks wasting time on Instagram is a problem so big that only the federal government can solve it.
Section 230 Is the Internet's First Amendment. Now Both Republicans and Democrats Want To Take It Away.
From Josh Hawley to Kamala Harris, online free speech is under attack.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.) has proposed a dreadful bill that would give the government control of internet content. He thinks the only reason anyone could be opposed is because they've been bought off.
"Section 230 has nothing to do with neutrality. Nothing. Zip. There is absolutely no weight to that argument," Wyden says. He oughta know. He wrote the damn thing.
From Sohrab Ahmari to Josh Hawley, what the new right really wants is to squelch free expression.
Plus: Immigration officials confirm Trump tweets about new raids, Elizabeth Warren talks sex work decriminalization, and more...
Hawley is selling it as a way to fight tech-company "bias" against Republicans. Don't believe him.
Be afraid as more journalists and politicians start calling for stronger policing of online speech.
Legal scholar Jeff Kosseff wanted to write a "biography" of Section 230, the law that immunizes websites and ISPs from a lot of legal actions. He fears he has written its obituary.
Nancy Pelosi wants to gut Section 230
Plus: Senators move to end warrantless NSA spying and the "Paycheck Fairness Act" passes the House.
Plus: a Robert Kraft/spa-sting update, Florida sex-buyer registry nixed, D.C. activist alleges entrapment, and more sex-work and sex-policy news.
Plus: SCOTUS declines Hawaii lesbian case, UC stands by professor in free speech standoff, and ACLU warns of "privacy Trojan horse."
"Google and Facebook should not be a law unto themselves. They should not be able to discriminate against conservatives."
Gun buyers, gay lovers, cannabis customers, and Yelp users are just a few of the groups that benefit from this federal law.
On Monday, a federal appeals court considered Grindr's guilt in a case involving app-based impersonators.
Killing Section 230 would only lead web platforms to ban even more speech.
The feds hound Facebook for ads that allegedly violate the Fair Housing Act.
The Senate Accused Them of Selling Kids for Sex. The FBI Raided Their Homes. Backpage.com's Founders Speak for the First Time.
An inside look at how indie media veterans James Larkin and Michael Lacey became the targets of a federal witchhunt.
Plus: digital privacy concerns down 11 percent since 2015
Director of Anti-Sex Trafficking Doc I Am Jane Doe Doesn't Understand the Laws She's Trying to Reform
Watch Elizabeth Nolan Brown discuss the film with director Mary Mazzio, who aims to overhaul Backpage and federal law in the name of sex-trafficked teens.
Judge Says Backpage Protected by First Amendment, Rejects Pimping Charges for CEO… Then Backtracks a Few Hours Later
"Congress has spoken on this matter and it is for Congress, not this court, to revisit." Except for maybe later this afternoon...
"Make no mistake; Kamala Harris has won all that she was looking to win when she had us arrested."
Plaintiffs coerced into prostitution as teens alleged that Backpage was complicit in their trafficking.
Senators sneak through SAVE Act as amendment, creating criminal liability for classified-ad sites.
Closing sites like Backpage.com puts trafficking victims at even more risk.