No, Government Boycotts of Nike Aren't Constitutional
The government may not discriminate against businesses because of the political views the business (or its spokesman) has expressed.
The government may not discriminate against businesses because of the political views the business (or its spokesman) has expressed.
The protesters may have broken the law, but two nights behind bars is a bit much.
Inviting followers to harass this man violates the platform's terms of service.
What happens when autonomous machines have "to choose between various shades of wrong?" A Q&A with defense analyst Paul Scharre.
And the guidelines for spying on journalists may be even looser under Trump.
The perils of poorly sourced stories
The Supreme Court's decision in Tinker is viewed as the high-water mark for students' First Amendment rights, but Justice Black's strident dissent-not the majority-spoke for most Americans at the time.
Online platforms will be subjected to a costly, easily-abused system that will likely pull down legal content.
"Solutions won't come from new laws from Washington, D.C., or from a speech police at the U.S. Department of Education."
His enterprising operation illustrates the valuable role porous borders play in undermining restrictive laws.
How should we feel about conscience-based discrimination?
The nation that gave the world John Milton and his cry for the "liberty to utter" is now at the forefront of shutting speech down.
The controversy might be two years old, but that didn't stop the Reno City Council from weighing in.
An NRA spokesperson correctly says marijuana is not "germane" to Jean's death but keeps bringing it up when discussing Castile's.
Since his whistleblowing, the United Kingdom has granted itself even more power to snoop on citizens.
Sen. Kamala Harris tried to limit the storefront speech of firearms sellers as California attorney general.
The Supreme Court nominee talks warrantless government surveillance with Sen. Patrick Leahy.
End of a Jim Crow-era law a potential win for jury nullification.
Clinton runs with a Kamala Harris whopper that's already been debunked.
Bill also calls for holding forum moderators legally liable for extreme speech.
This time the Libertarian Party seems to be hurting the Democrat, who's trying to run out the clock on confirming Brett Kavanaugh.
The case against Krissy Noble shows how drug and gun laws conspire to deprive people of a fundamental right.
So a federal judge just held.
"Brett Kavanaugh said he would kill Roe v. Wade last week." Except he didn't.
Harris and other Democrats distorted Kavanaugh's comments on birth control to portray him as a religious extremist.
So a Sixth Circuit panel just held, and it also concluded that the statements weren't actionable under Kentucky law.
The next Reason/Soho Forum Debate pits criminologist Gary Kleck against former Brady Center To Prevent Gun Violence President Paul Helmke.
The defendant, Imani Pennant, reportedly said that there's a web site that helps people create such orders.
Demands for government oversight hide opportunism amid rhetoric about safety.
Critiquing an ex-president's warnings about anti-media rhetoric, non-voting, and unelected bureaucrats
An aide for the jailed dissident calls Google's actions "political censorship."
The Sixth Circuit reaffirms this, including for sexual assault accusations, in a case against the University of Michigan; and the court also allows plaintiff to proceed with his claim that the process was biased against him because of his sex.
If credibility is at stake, "the university must give the accused student or his agent an opportunity to cross-examine the accuser."
An interesting new Younger abstention case from the Ninth Circuit, arising in our challenge to Washington's very broad criminal harassment statute.
There are many reasons to be excited about the NFL's return. The national anthem controversy isn't one of them.
Fun fact: All laws give government control of the decisions that everybody of any gender can do with their bodies.
Rand Paul betrays his civil libertarian principles when he calls for using junk science to ferret out disloyalty.
The state pays (and generously) to avoid the pending cert. petition in Allah v. Milling
Conspiracy theorist banned for "abusive behavior."
The senator is miffed that the SCOTUS nominee thinks people have a right to own the guns she wants to ban.
The Department of Justice plans to look into whether social media platforms are "hurting competition and intentionally stifling the free exchange of ideas."
Kamala Harris wants Brett Kavanaugh to give gun violence victims "a fair shake," by which she means adopting her view of the Second Amendment.
The girl was in tears as firefighters removed taser barbs from her body.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.