CBP Really Doesn't Want To Reveal What It Does to Americans' Phones
A judge ruled that the border agency has to give a clearer explanation for why it seized a traveler’s phone without a warrant.
A judge ruled that the border agency has to give a clearer explanation for why it seized a traveler’s phone without a warrant.
Until recently, the state imposed no limits at all on automated license plate readers, which track the travels of innocent motorists across the country.
CBP allegedly told the nurse that “your lawyer cannot do anything” and agents can take the data “the easy way or the hard way.”
Mario Ayala is seeking the return of his property, which federal agents seized more than a year and a half ago for reasons that remain mysterious.
The feds are charging Samuel Tunick for destroying his phone at the border. Court documents show that they refused him a lawyer and lied about why he was searched.
Federal appeals courts rejected qualified immunity for cops and a judge who flouted longstanding constitutional principles.
Frustrated by the children's resistance to a parental custody decision, Judge Eric Eighmy locked them in cells until they became more cooperative.
Car-tracking cameras, like cellphones, generate vast amounts of sensitive data.
The case of George Anibowei, a U.S. citizen who has had his phone searched at least five times at the border, shows just how invasive border agents have become.
State and federal courts have almost uniformly ruled that searches of ALPR databases do not implicate the Fourth Amendment.
According to complaints filed by Good's family, Ross was not in any danger when he fired three shots into her car.
"It is clearly established that an officer cannot pull someone over without reasonable suspicion and thereafter concoct a fabricated traffic violation," the appeals court says.
Federal appeals courts differ on whether the Fourth Amendment protects your cellphone at the border. A Texas lawyer is asking the Supreme Court to settle it.
A federal appeals court says it's legal for federal agents to scroll through your phone and take pictures of its contents without a warrant or suspicion of criminal activity.
Recent comments by Greg Abbott and Ron DeSantis reflect a bipartisan backlash against warrantless surveillance.
The habitually dishonest department uncritically accepted a story that was immediately contradicted by video footage and physical evidence.
Americans are starting to recognize the dangers of pervasive surveillance by automated license plate readers.
In a federal lawsuit, Byron Prophet argues that police supervisors "turned a blind eye" for years as Gerald Goines framed innocent people.
The Kansas Justice Institute argues that Wichita's "warrantless ALPR dragnet surveillance program" violates the state constitution's privacy protections.
The Secret Service asserted a nonexistent "emergency" to track Comey's cellphone, and the FBI's evidence falls far short of proving his seashell picture was a crime.
The government is charging Samuel Tunick for telling them a code that would erase all the data on his phone—after they tried to take it on false pretenses.
The justices said the "open fields" doctrine, a sweeping exception to constitutional privacy protections, does not apply in the Keystone State.
Cops stopped a semitruck because of a drug tip, then tried to dress the illegal search up as a routine inspection.
The decision rebukes the DOJ for demanding "private and sensitive" information about Georgia election workers "with no legitimate law enforcement purpose."
Neil Gorsuch proposes an alternative to a Fourth Amendment standard that has proven to be an unreliable safeguard against government snooping.
The justice criticizes the Court’s endorsement of coercive plea bargaining and its embrace of dubious Fourth Amendment doctrines.
The justice argues that the "reasonable expectation of privacy" test and the third-party doctrine are indefensible in theory and unworkable in practice.
After a magistrate judge said a DHS investigator had failed to establish probable cause, the government decided it did not need the YouTube and iPhone records after all.
The president's last-minute endorsement of Paxton was driven by his petty grievances against incumbent Sen. John Cornyn, who was clearly the safer bet to retain the seat.
Perry County Sheriff Nick Weems preposterously claimed that Larry Bushart had threatened "mass violence" at a school.
That defense applies only when an officer "reasonably" believed he was acting within his federal authority.
Most federal appeals courts have recognized the right to record police. DHS employees nevertheless seem to view it as a crime.
"Geofence" searches illustrate the perilous combination of modern technology and deference to law enforcement.
The governor is threatening to defund the police because of an ordinance noting that an ICE administrative warrant "does not justify a stop, arrest, or continued detention" by city officers.
The city has created a network of nearly 500 cameras that routinely monitor innocent people as they go about their daily lives.
Two petitions ask the Supreme Court to uphold the remedy required by the Fifth Amendment.
The jurors concluded that the officers violated the Fourth and 14th amendments when they seized a 14-year-old without evidence that she was in danger.
But for a fraudulent and misleading warrant affidavit, Taylor would not have been killed during a fruitless late-night drug raid.
Department of Homeland Security
The Oklahoma senator, nominated to replace Kristi Noem, is blasé about the use of deadly force.
Technological innovations allow the authorities to see who has visited whole geographic areas.
Department of Homeland Security
The homeland security secretary blatantly misrepresented what she said about Alex Pretti on the day he was killed.
A mayor and a police chief "mistook their authority to maintain order for a license to suppress criticism," says U.S. District Judge Stephanie Rose.
Department of Homeland Security
The department's pattern of dishonesty supports a presumption of irregularity.
A pending appropriations bill could increase transparency and accountability by requiring DHS personnel to record encounters with the public.
The department now describes the threat as "several civilians" who were "yelling and blowing whistles."
Federal officials suggested that carrying a firearm is inherently threatening and an invitation to police violence.
As with Renee Good, a calmer response could have avoided the lethal outcome.
Although the president initially reinforced that plainly inaccurate narrative, his subsequent comments cast doubt on the initial justification for shooting the Minneapolis protester.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.