9/11's Lesson: War Doesn't Work
Historian Stephen Wertheim says two decades of failed wars have finally made America more likely to embrace military restraint.
Historian Stephen Wertheim says two decades of failed wars have finally made America more likely to embrace military restraint.
Now they'll have to explain to a federal judge how this isn't a violation of the First Amendment.
Plus: Tipped minimum wage kills jobs, how the U.S. "helped" out women in rural Afghanistan, and more...
What if every one of your noncash financial transactions was automatically reported to a beefed-up, audit-hungry IRS?
S.B. 8 relies on litigation tricks that conservatives have long condemned as a threat to the rule of law.
Hint: It wasn't Big Tech censorship.
Plus, why is no one talking about the Medicare Trustees' entitlement report?
"I have my First Amendment rights," says Hank Robar.
An encryption back door will lead to abusive authoritarian surveillance—even if you present it as a way to stop child porn.
In June, police stormed the offices of Apple Daily, one of the last pro-democracy newspapers and an unapologetic defender of Hong Kong's autonomy.
While libertarians will be inclined to applaud some of the new laws, others exemplify familiar conservative excesses.
Former District Attorney Jackie Johnson may face accountability for her official actions in the Ahmaud Arbery investigation.
By and large, those schemes (like Texas’s SB 8 liability for abortion providers) must be fought by raising the Constitution as a defense in a civil lawsuit—not through preenforcement challenges.
The same legal ruse can be used against gun rights and other civil liberties, not just against abortion.
Denizens of the popular online forum protested the spread of COVID misinformation, but the company rightly wouldn't cave to their demands. It still cracked down on 55 subreddits in the end.
Plus: More bad news for free speech online, Fauci on booster shots, and more...
A federal judge says an anti-porn group's suit against Twitter can move forward, in a case that could portend a dangerous expansion of how courts define "sex trafficking."
"Governor McKinney had no power to contract away the Commonwealth's essential power of freedom of government speech in perpetuity by simply signing the 1890 Deed."
in a case brought by a woman who was trying to document her claims that a school affiliated with a local Islamic center was overusing a local park.
Officials look for scapegoats to blame as the working force suffers burnout.
The decision is wrong, but consistent with previous precedent. Yet it also threatens to create a road map for circumventing constitutional rights. Fortunately, the latter can be prevented.
Plus: Millennial myth busting, McFlurry madness, and more...
Blankenship had been convicted of a misdemeanor related to a deadly disaster at a mine his company owned; Trump, Jr. had erroneously labeled him a "felon"; a judge concluded that there's enough evidence that Trump, Jr. knew the statement was false, or at least likely false.
Because the Supreme Court so far has not intervened, post-heartbeat abortions are now illegal in the Lone Star State.
Compared to pandemic employment shifts in other fields, law enforcement numbers are fairly stable.
The agency returns to a research area where it has caused much controversy in the past.
"The pandemic's wrongest man" can likely profit from martyrdom.
Plus: Kids got more obese during the pandemic, how Section 230 protects gun rights, and more...
Even supporters of the law should recognize the dangers of using enforcement as punishment.
The court rejects the argument that publicity about the lawsuit might taint jury pool, and "has imposed a deep emotional burden upon [church's] current members, imposes a possibility of some clients of the church's weekly meal, food pantry, counseling programs, or other services withdrawing their participation [and] imposes a possibility of loss of donors."
A sharp departure from the Trump administration's approach
Supporting the cause because your "side" went down is not a principled position.
"You have no choice in the matter."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks