Another State Supreme Court Stands Up for Economic Liberty
Following Georgia's ruling in favor of a lactation consultant, Pennsylvania’s high court reviews another “unreasonable” occupational licensing scheme.
Following Georgia's ruling in favor of a lactation consultant, Pennsylvania’s high court reviews another “unreasonable” occupational licensing scheme.
The federal courts start to grapple with COVID-19 shutdown orders.
In a 2-1 decision sure to provoke substantial debate, a court concludes that states are obligated to provide citizens with a certain degree of education.
Bogus lawsuits threaten medical professionals who are fighting on the front lines against COVID-19.
Legal scholars Lindsay Wiley and Steve Vladeck explain why courts should not give special deference to the government in cases challenging the constitutionality of anti-coronavirus policies.
New emergency rules attempt to slow down justice system to keep people apart.
“Why should courts, charged with the independent and neutral interpretation of the laws Congress has enacted, defer to such bureaucratic pirouetting?”
Jurors remain free to exercise judgment and mercy in a criminal justice system that often lacks both.
A state law allows counties to effectively steal homes over unpaid taxes and keep the excess revenue for their own budgets.
In fact, the legal doctrine lets cops to get away with outrageous conduct.
The 7th Circuit said the guard is protected by qualified immunity.
Parents in Canada seek damages and refunds for their children's in-game purchases.
It took a jury 26 minutes to decide that Jonathan Vanderhagen wasn't guilty.
A court ruled that officers did not have enough information to know whether or not stealing violates the Constitution.
Jonathan Vanderhagen believes a judge doomed his son to an early death. The judge says Vanderhagen's Facebook posts were intimidating.
Plus: millennials are buying homes after all, protecting Pinterest from anti-vaxxers, and more...
Two federal court rulings cite a significant conflict of interest.
The ruling once again shows the legal disgrace that is qualified immunity.
Proposed federal legislation would move overstressed child protection systems in the wrong direction.
"No reasonable officer would engage in such recklessness," complains dissenting judge.
Justice Natalie Lieven ruled it was in the woman's "best interests" because she has learning disabilities.
“The Court usually reads statutes with a presumption of rationality and a presumption of constitutionality.”
Understanding what's at stake in the important case of Kisor v. Wilkie.
SCOTUS sidesteps the hard questions in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky.
A study shows that when these fees hit low-income offenders, they wreck their lives—and also don't even get paid.
Rasta Imposta has a history of defending its "unique" banana costume design with copyright litigation.
Cherry regulation, landfill corruption, and taking some air.
Better evidence sharing and a dramatic drop in cash bail demands will help defendants challenge charges.
The former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York unconvincingly channels Atticus Finch in his legal memoir.
Federal judge's ruling in a fair-use lawsuit "is a big win for the First Amendment."
The Court voted along ideological lines.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor has some concerns.
Compelled use of facial and finger recognition features runs afoul of the Fifth Amendment.
The Trump administration can't ask about citizenship on the 2020 census, Judge Jesse Furman ruled.
It's not the first time the two justices have teamed up on a criminal justice case.
The Trump administration's response to a lawsuit challenging steel tariffs is a deeply un-conservative argument for greater executive power.
A federal court has struck down a New York ban inspired by kung fu movies.
The ruling extends to secret recordings of police officers.
But not according Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied a recommendation to relieve him of execution.
A defense of Brett Kavanaugh's nominated replacement on the D.C. Circuit.
New Jersey State Police Sgt. Marc Dennis was charged with falsifying records.
"He was releasing everybody. Apparently he was saying that's what the voters wanted."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks