Donald Trump

Trump Eyes Libertarian-Minded Texas Judge for Federal Court Vacancy

The Trump administration has two openings to fill on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.

|

There are currently two vacancies on the New Orleans-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, the federal appellate court whose jurisdiction covers federal districts in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. According to a recent report published in Legal Times, the Trump administration is moving quickly to fill those vacancies and is now considering a shortlist of six candidates for the two jobs. What names are on the list? Here's Legal Times:

According to four people who are familiar with the process but who declined to be named, the candidates being considered include: Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett; U.S. District Court Judge Reed O'Connor of Fort Worth; former Texas solicitor general James Ho; Andy Oldham, a deputy general counsel to Gov. Greg Abbott; Michael Massengale, a justice on Houston's First Court of Appeals, and Brett Busby, a justice on Houston's Fourteenth Court of Appeals.

Two names on this list jump right out at me.

Texas Supreme Court

The first is Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett, a rising star in conservative and libertarian legal circles who also appeared on Trump's recent list of potential U.S. Supreme Court nominees.

Willett is best-known for his concurring opinion in the 2015 case of Patel v. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation. At issue was whether state officials had a legitimate health or safety reason to require eyebrow threaders to obtain an occupational license before they could lawfully charge customers for the act of threading a piece of cotton string through their eyebrows in order to remove old hair and skin. The Texas Supreme Court laughed away the state's ostensible justifications and struck down the regulation.

Willett joined the majority opinion but also wrote separately in order to emphasize the broader issues at stake. His 49-page concurrence is effectively a call to judicial arms in defense of economic liberty. "This case is fundamentally about the American Dream and the unalienable human right to pursue happiness without curtsying to government on bended knee," he wrote. "It is about whether government can connive with rent-seeking factions to ration liberty unrestrained, and whether judges must submissively uphold even the most risible encroachments." I should also note that Willett's Patel opinion favorably cited my book Overruled: The Long War for Control of the U.S. Supreme Court.

If successfully appointed to the 5th Circuit, Willett would immediately rank as one of the most libertarian-minded federal judges in the country.

The second name on the 5th Circuit shortlist that jumps out at me is former Texas solicitor general James Ho. A former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas, Ho is perhaps best known in legal circles for a 2006 law review article defending the constitutionality of birthright citizenship for the U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrant parents. "Birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment," Ho wrote. "That birthright is protected no less for children of undocumented persons than for descendants of Mayflower passengers."

Notably, Ho's position here is directly at odds with the stated views of Donald Trump. In an August 2015 immigration white paper, for example, presidential candidate Trump vowed to "end birthright citizenship," calling it the "biggest magnet for illegal immigration." In an interview with Fox News host Bill O'Reilly, Trump said, "I don't think they have American citizenship," referring to the U.S.-born children of undocumented parents. "It's not going to hold up in court, it's going to have to be tested."

Here's an amusing thought experiment: Trump tries to test his theory of birthright citizenship in the 5th Circuit and ends up in the courtroom of Trump-appointee Judge James Ho. How does Trump respond after Judge Ho rules decisively against him?

NEXT: Help Choose "The 50 Most Influential Libertarians" at FreedomFest with William Shatner This July!

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Willett is also the King of Twitter. If you’re not following him, your life is half-lived.

  2. How does Trump respond after Judge Ho rules decisively against him?

    HE’LL SEE HIM IN COURT.

    This is possibly good news. Willett is great, it’d be good to have him making judicial decisions at a national level. Fingers crossed.

  3. I was hoping for him for SCOTUS. If not SCOTUS I think I’d rather keep on on the Texas court.

  4. More excited about the possibility of Willett than Ho. Believing that illegal immigrant children born in the US are citizens does not a libertarian make.

    1. No. All that means is that he can comprehend simple sentences in the English language.

      1. I’ve worked in law firms for years, and in my experience, that is a rare ability indeed in a legal mind.

          1. Well, in John’s defense, why develop reading comprehension when you can just peer into the author’s innermost thoughts?

            1. If he had reading comprehension, we wouldn’t have his wonderful typoes.

    2. Maybe the libertarian names are just in there to scare the Dems and Conservatives
      into voting for one of the other four candidates?

  5. How does Trump respond after Judge Ho rules decisively against him?

    With a Twitter hissy fit that will make all his previous hissy fits look like calm, reasoned discourse?

    1. One of the joys of Trump is anticipating the twitter hissy fits to come. It’s been barely a month; what will the next 47 bring?

    2. “How does Trump respond after Judge Ho rules decisively against him?”

      Ho, ho, ho, so-called judge! I’ll reverse my appointment!

      1. I wonder if there’s a judicial appointment equivalent to the NYC school rubber rooms for teachers and principals they can’t fire? He could just promote these judges sideways.

        Has any judge ever turned down an appointment because it was a sideways demotion like that?

  6. Ryder . I just agree… Amanda `s story is something… last monday I got a top of the range Alfa Romeo from having made $5127 this last 5 weeks and-in excess of, 10k lass-month . it’s by-far my favourite-job Ive ever done . I started this four months/ago and pretty much straight away started bringin home over $74, per-hour . hop over to this site
    ??????O????????????-+__+_+_+ https://tinyurl.com/2dayjob-com -*-*-*-*-*-*???????-

  7. Willet believes “the only way to secure civil society is through universal submission to the absolute authority of a sovereign.”

    Bend the knee you cowardly bitch.

  8. I love how Trump moves in directions that Reason should love, but yet, every article must have some part poking at Trump to keep up appearances.

    “Trump tries to test his theory of birthright citizenship in the 5th Circuit and ends up in the courtroom of Trump-appointee Judge James Ho. How does Trump respond after Judge Ho rules decisively against him?”

    Are you so sure Judge Ho would have the majority opinion? Birthright citizenship hinges on the “under jurisdiction” aspect of the 14th and it has not been clearly decided relative to people here illegally. There are sound legal arguments to be made that someone who actively avoided the jurisdiction of the US cannot then claim they are under it relative to the 14th. In no way is it a slam dunk.

  9. RE: Trump Eyes Libertarian-Minded Texas Judge for Federal Court Vacancy
    The Trump administration has two openings to fill on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.

    This must never happen.
    No libertarian should ever fill any court vacancy, much less a federal court opening.
    These political dinosaurs would only enforce the US Constitution and ensure the little peoples’ rights were not violated.
    Needless to say, that’s not what Stalin would do.

  10. How does Trump respond after Judge Ho rules decisively against him?

    Shoot the hostage.

    1. OLL! I like that. Made me laugh. The downside, I had a mouth full of coffee at the time that nearly shot out my nose.

  11. I looked at the check for $8628 , I didnt believe that…my… father in law was like actualie taking home money in there spare time on there computar. . there sisters roommate haz done this for under 17 months and just cleard the morgage on there apartment and got a gorgeous Chevrolet Corvette . go to websit========= http://www.net.pro70.com

  12. I looked at the check for $8628 , I didnt believe that…my… father in law was like actualie taking home money in there spare time on there computar. . there sisters roommate haz done this for under 17 months and just cleard the morgage on there apartment and got a gorgeous Chevrolet Corvette . go to websit========= http://www.4dayjobs.com

  13. I looked at the check for $8628 , I didnt believe that…my… father in law was like actualie taking home money in there spare time on there computar. . there sisters roommate haz done this for under 17 months and just cleard the morgage on there apartment and got a gorgeous Chevrolet Corvette . go to websit========= http://www.net.pro70.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.