Why Did YouTube Remove This Reason Video?
Our coverage of biohackers working on a DIY vaccine last year was solid reporting on an important subject. If YouTube insists on banning journalism like this, what's next?
Our coverage of biohackers working on a DIY vaccine last year was solid reporting on an important subject. If YouTube insists on banning journalism like this, what's next?
People fret about online echo chambers, but offline echo chambers can be just as strong—or stronger.
"I chose to be that guy who didn't issue the apology," says Daniel Elder. "Things went from there and it wasn't good."
The law would make a federal case out of every aggrieved internet user and compel companies to host messages they do not wish to platform.
Jones has been accused of fabricating her COVID-19 cover-up claims. Now she says she's running for Congress.
I don't know the correct level of content moderation by Facebook, Twitter, Google, or Amazon, and neither do you.
How reactionary politicians are using monopoly concerns as cover to pursue pre-existing political agendas
A new article's authors thanked Twitter for calling out their problematic microaggressions.
The creator of ultra-woke poet Titania McGrath makes the case against cancel culture.
Plus: Prosecutors are big lobbyists for new crime bills, Biden floats compromise on corporate taxes, and more...
The creator of Titania McGrath on cancel culture, government overreach, and younger generations' willingness to censor
“The Act is so rife with fundamental infirmities that it appears to have been enacted without any regard for the Constitution,” the lawsuit reads.
We expect British royals to favor muzzling commoners, but too many lawmakers feel the same way.
Calling a classmate a racist slur on Snapchat is offensive. It’s also protected speech.
It's a working model for non-state governance in cyberspace that is vastly preferable to government control of social media.
A member of the board (and a Cato Institute vice president) defends the controversial decision to kick the former president off the social media platform.
Facebook can't kill, jail, or tax you. It can only stop you from posting on Facebook.
"It's very obvious that nobody involved in [the bill] consulted a First Amendment lawyer," says TechFreedom's Berin Szóka.
"At the time of Mr. Trump's posts, there was a clear, immediate risk of harm."
Plus: The challenges of free speech on Twitter, the case against baseball bailouts, and more...
From "power poses" to the self-esteem movement to implicit bias tests, we want to believe one small tweak will solve our problems, says Jesse Singal.
"The notion that a school can discipline a student for that kind of...non-harassing expression is contrary to our First Amendment tradition."
A moot case about Trump blocking tweets leads to concerns that tech companies have too much control over speech.
Civil liberties advocates warn that the legislation threatens activism, journalism, and satire.
What about the federal government's own health experts?
Even minor tweaks to the law could shore up Mark Zuckerberg's dominance.
Plus: Atlanta shooter blames "sex addiction," Maryland wants new occupational licensing requirements, and more...
"We don't need to use a faulty model and apply it to the very real terrorism problem that we have at home," says terrorism expert Max Abrahms.
The whole thing is arguably voided by Section 230.
Plus: Problems with the PRO Act, what libertarian feminism isn't, and more...
Plus: Iowa limits early voting, a prominent sex trafficking "rescue" group relies on psychics, and more...
All professions deserve the same constitutional protections that speech-heavy industries get.
Is the senator's authoritarian grandstanding the dark future of the GOP?
One bill would require lengthy disclaimers on all online political ads.
Plus: The era of sovereign influencers, a new experiment in universal basic income, and more...
Big outlets get subsidies. The government still gets to pick winners and losers.
Platform censorship results from centralized design. Cryptocurrency techies are building decentralized alternatives.
He was no libertarian, but he absorbed an important lesson about regulating speech.
TikTok may have outlasted the Trump administration, but whether it will find another enemy in Biden is unclear.
Online companies might not be as nefarious as you think.
Plus: The aftermath of the New York Times' anti-Pornhub crusade, and more...
"Silicon Valley's Safe Space" has misinformed readers.
Tech companies should have the same freedom to choose their customers.
A person you know might be having an online conversation without a transcriptionist and a fact-checker right now, and we have to stop it.
The paid online newsletter service allows writers the opportunity to keep more of the fruits of their labors.
It’s a terrible idea that violates Section 230, but is it actually unconstitutional? Don’t be so sure.