Yale Journal on Regulation Symposium on Peter Shane's "Democracy's Chief Executive"
Participants include Daniel Farber, Keith Whittington, Cristina Rodriguez, Lisa Heinzerling, and myself, among others.
Participants include Daniel Farber, Keith Whittington, Cristina Rodriguez, Lisa Heinzerling, and myself, among others.
Voters told exit pollsters they had little confidence in the ability of either Fetterman or Oz to represent Pennsylvania.
Justices Thomas and Gorsuch have a much greater appetite for reconsidering prior precedent than the other justices do.
A divided panel concludes that government officials forced to testify at Flint Water Crisis civil trial did not waive their constitutional right against self-incrimination just because they had answered questions in depositions.
According to the ruling, the Pima County Board of Supervisors violated the state constitution's Gift Clause with its sweetheart deal to a space tourism company.
In her short, yet searing dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson argues that the court should have granted the petition of an Ohio man sentenced to death after prosecutors hid a key witness' severe intellectual disability from jurors.
It's her willingness to wield state power to punish the ideas and groups she dislikes.
Though the candidates have seemingly little in common, either one winning will harm the cause of individual liberty.
Plus: Peter Suderman may or may not attempt a rendition of a famous rap from the movie Bulworth.
Unfortunately, in five separate cases today, they're outnumbered.
To be precise, it's not an ethical violation, when opposing counsel e-mails you cc'ing their clients, and you Reply All. (But some states disagree.)
Plus: University cancels "The Problem of Whiteness" class, Twitter's snowflake-in-chief, and more...
The proposed constitutional amendment would shift the state's balance of political power.
Priscilla Villarreal found herself in a jail cell for publishing two routine stories. A federal court still can't decide what to do about that.
The crucial protector of internet speech might have some cracks in its armor.
Boeing reports that the two new presidential shuttles its building will now be $2 billion over budget.
Even before his personal foibles became front-page news, the former football star was more like a caricature of a bad candidate.
The most jarring thing about Senate candidate J.D. Vance is how open he is about rejecting the rule of law.
Neither candidate in the crucially important Pennsylvania Senate race has made much of a positive case for his candidacy.
In a post-FOSTA world, Section 230 still protects websites from lawsuits over criminal sexual conduct by their users.
On Tuesday, the senator erroneously claimed that "free speech does not include spreading misinformation."
Plus: The emptiness of Democrats' pro-democracy rhetoric, the real reason Social Security checks are getting bigger, and more...
Supreme Court protesters may get their moment of fame, but they may make it less likely the justices will allow live video broadcast of oral arguments.
If the midterms favor Republicans, their top priority needs to be the fight against inflation—whether or not they feel like they created the problem.
The federal appellate judge suggests judges should focus less on social media attention, and more on ensuring their opinions are clear, succinct and correct.
The anti-immigrant tenor of the state's GOP candidates is keeping reasonable conversations about border security out of reach.
In a now-deleted tweet, the official White House Twitter account attempted to frame a mandated cost-of-living increase in Social Security checks as the result of President Biden's good "leadership."
Amendment 1 would grant public workers collective bargaining power over just about anything that affects them, ignoring the will of voters and lawmakers.
Like Arizona's Marc Victor, Erik Gerhardt is a potential spoiler in one of the nation's biggest Senate races. Unlike Victor, he's embracing the role.
Voters will soon cast ballots on a constitutional amendment that seeks to explicitly remove any protections for abortion in the state's constitution.
The music industry objects to the use of rap lyrics by prosecutors.
In the two cases, brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions argues that race-conscious admissions violate the Civil Rights Act
The agency should be abolished and its employees sent to seek jobs in the private sector.
New article in symposium on the law and politics of impeachment now available
New data from the Public Religion Research Institute show a dramatic decline in Republican support for making abortion illegal in all cases. How this will effect voter behavior remains to be seen.
The Institute for Justice argues evidence from warrantless searches can’t be used for zoning enforcement.
This November, voters will have the chance to abolish it. They should.
The Honorable Ben Beaton would prefer not to be called "Your Honor."
In his dismissal order, the judge cited Section 230, the law protecting websites from liability for user-generated content.
An amicus brief by Professor Derek Muller suggests the justices need not confront the "Independent State Legislature" doctrine head on.
The idea that the Fed has the knowledge necessary to control the economy with perfectly calibrated policies was always an illusion.
But…does that make any sense?
Will a new commission at the U.S. Department of Agriculture solve racism? We're going to find out.
Local officials argue that the eye-popping sum is necessary due to rising construction costs, but experts disagree.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks