Why James Madison Wanted Greater Limits on States' Rights
The “father of the Constitution” worried about federal and state overreach.
The “father of the Constitution” worried about federal and state overreach.
The liberal justice wants the Supreme Court’s harshest progressive critics to chill out.
Michael Soyfer, an attorney at the Institute for Justice, calls it “just the tip of the iceberg.”
Constitutional limits on federal authority should not be partisan matters.
Will they be held responsible for the illegal search and the damage to his property?
What’s at stake in Ream v. U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Plus: San Francisco slashes affordable housing mandates, wide support for streamlining environmental review, and Mamdani's rent ripoff report.
Leonard Hoffmann and his neighbors in North Dakota went to court to fight for fair market value—as the Constitution promises—after WBI Energy Transmission said it would take their land at a discount.
Plus: An unconstitutional war is back on.
From executive power to civil liberties, what to make of a momentous year at SCOTUS?
The conservative justice pushed for greater executive authority even in cases in which Trump won.
Why Trump lost big in the Supreme Court cases he cared the most about
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi discuss NYC's air conditioning wars, birthright citizenship, 2010s comedy, and more!
The case could settle the long-simmering issue of whether the Second Amendment covers commonly owned but politically disfavored rifles.
Understanding Trump v. Barbara.
The Supreme Court extended presidential control over federal agencies. What could go wrong?
Understanding Chatrie v. United States.
Washington’s troops won the ground war, but today's left and right are waging war on the ideals of the Revolution.
War making in "the power of a single man" is not what the Founders intended.
Understanding the stakes of Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections.
The conservative justice continues to wage a lonely legal crusade over the Commerce Clause.
A landmark win for the right to keep and bear arms in United States v. Hemani.
Understanding the stakes in Kian v. Florida
The man known only as "A Farmer" warned against the "sword of government."
The proposal was nixed only after White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf explained why it was legally dubious.
The family's attorney says it's the largest settlement for a dog shooting case in Colorado history.
How a four-decade-old dissent may now help the president fire independent federal agency heads at will
Civil liberties groups say recording the police is core First Amendment activity. The Right to Record Act of 2026 would create a right to sue federal officers who violate it.
Behind Japan's economic success lies a government and legal system that clearly prioritize social stability and group harmony over individual rights.
The American Civil Liberties Union is asking a judge to block the Memphis Safe Task Force from retaliating against anyone who exercises their First Amendment right to record the police.
Damon Root discusses the path to emancipation, the struggle to secure freedom after the Civil War, and the constitutional changes that remade America.
Plus: a few words about my new book
The president’s habitual attempts to criminalize dissent hark back to tyrants of yore.
The two judicial conservatives continue to disappoint criminal justice reform advocates.
He famously said the Founders had created "a republic, if you can keep it." How have we kept it? And can we continue?
Vicki Baker is more fortunate than several other similarly situated victims. But it took a very long time to get there.
Lifetime tenure for federal judges has been the constitutional practice since ratification.
Should it take more than a 5–4 vote for the Supreme Court to strike down a federal law?
Leo Garcia Venegas and the Institute for Justice are suing to block immigration raids on private construction sites that target Latinos.
Plus: A "supremely cringe" viral tweet about the Supreme Court
Neil Gorsuch's new book reminds us that to accelerate progress, we must first acknowledge the progress that has already occurred.
The Dissident Right is furious with Neil Gorsuch for saying America is a creedal nation. That just goes to show how out of touch its obsessions are.
From immigration and guns to executive power, transgender athletes, and mail-in ballots, these are the Supreme Court cases to watch out for in May and June.
The justice defends the Supreme Court as a model of respectful and principled adjudication.
Congress hasn't voted to declare war since 1942, yet the legislative branch constantly refuses to rein in presidents.
The Supreme Court justice discusses the Declaration of Independence, how unchecked power threatens liberty, and what the Founders can teach future generations.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.