How Much Deference Does SCOTUS Owe to Congress?
Should it take more than a 5–4 vote for the Supreme Court to strike down a federal law?
Should it take more than a 5–4 vote for the Supreme Court to strike down a federal law?
Leo Garcia Venegas and the Institute for Justice are suing to block immigration raids on private construction sites that target Latinos.
Plus: A "supremely cringe" viral tweet about the Supreme Court
Neil Gorsuch's new book reminds us that to accelerate progress, we must first acknowledge the progress that has already occurred.
The Dissident Right is furious with Neil Gorsuch for saying America is a creedal nation. That just goes to show how out of touch its obsessions are.
From immigration and guns to executive power, transgender athletes, and mail-in ballots, these are the Supreme Court cases to watch out for in May and June.
The justice defends the Supreme Court as a model of respectful and principled adjudication.
Congress hasn't voted to declare war since 1942, yet the legislative branch constantly refuses to rein in presidents.
The Supreme Court justice discusses the Declaration of Independence, how unchecked power threatens liberty, and what the Founders can teach future generations.
Plus: The Supreme Court says “demands for a charity’s private member or donor information” raises First Amendment problems.
The government wants access to millions of cell phone location histories. The Supreme Court will decide what the Fourth Amendment allows.
Plus: Does Trump expect to lose the birthright citizenship case?
Democrats can't muster the votes to impeach and remove Trump, or even to stop an illegal war. The 25th Amendment would be even more difficult.
Remembering the infuriating case of United States v. “The Spirit of ’76.”
Plus: The Alito retirement rumors keep swirling.
How the digital privacy rights of millions are at stake in Chatrie v. United States.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.
There is no voting crisis that demands federal intervention.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara.
Understanding the stakes in Trump v. Barbara.
A war by any other name must still be authorized by Congress.
Two different pieces of legislation aim to create state workarounds to the procedural quagmire of federal civil rights litigation.
What’s at stake in Watson v. Republican National Committee.
“Officers don’t have the blanket authority to arrest anyone who runs from them,” says an attorney from the Institute for Justice.
Ohio sheriff's deputies raided Afroman's house in 2022 based on a bogus tip, then sued the rapper after he released music videos mocking the deputies.
Plus: Brian Doherty, RIP.
What happens if both political parties come to distrust the Court’s judgment?
The judiciary is largely absent from the long-running constitutional debate over undeclared foreign wars.
Plus: An unsettling comparison between the Iran War and “Lyndon Johnson going into Vietnam.”
The president has no lawful authority to launch a war absent a congressional declaration of war.
More habeas corpus petitions were filed over the last year than in the past three administrations combined because of the administration's mass detention policy.
The conservative justice’s regrettable opinion in Learning Resources v. Trump.
What explains the fracture in the Supreme Court's "conservative bloc"?
A federal judge ruled in 2022 that "no legitimate humane system would operate" like Arizona's prison health care system. Three years later, that same judge found the problems still hadn't been fixed.
The battle against the president's so-called reciprocal tariffs is won, but the war for free trade and a stable business environment continues.
Is the conservative Supreme Court justice planning to retire this year?
News outlets, civil rights groups, and court records tell a much different story than the government's claims about "Operation Catch of the Day."
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
Three Republicans defected to vote down an arcane procedural rule that would have made it impossible for the House to vote on Trump’s tariffs until August.
Plus: Is this the Supreme Court’s next big immigration case?
Lower courts keep inventing loopholes to uphold discriminatory booze regulations.
Here's a quick reminder of what the Fourth Amendment has to say about that.
Sandy Martinez's little-known story is a microcosm of the broader debate over what, exactly, transgresses the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines.
Plus: More evidence that immigrants are good for America, Trump's call to "nationalize" elections, and more...
Plus: Why is the Supreme Court’s tariff decision taking so long?
It is nearly impossible to sue a rights-violating federal agent under current caselaw.
FIRE condemned the police visit: "This blatant overreach is offensive to the First Amendment."
Plus: Still waiting on the tariffs case.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks