Our Constitution: "Well-Regulated Democracy," "In Its Principles … Purely Democratical"
I keep hearing the same (pointless, I think) claims that America is a republic, not a democracy. It's both a republic and a democracy.
I keep hearing the same (pointless, I think) claims that America is a republic, not a democracy. It's both a republic and a democracy.
Noted environmental law scholar Richard Revesz will be nominated to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
U.S. counterterrorism action in Somalia hasn’t been approved by Congress, but it rages on anyway.
Republicans are losing ground in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.
Tyler Cowen explains why it's a mistake to conflate democracy with what is good and just.
An effort to ban sales of two books to minors ended with a Virginia judge saying that the state’s obscenity statute is “unconstitutional on its face."
The Insular Cases “rest on a rotten foundation,” Gorsuch wrote.
Mary Peltola will only be the third Democrat, as well as the first Native Alaskan, to represent Alaska since it became a state.
A new ordinance in Franklin will restrict evening and weekend protests and subject violators to misdemeanor charges.
Plus: California "Kid's Code" bill could mean face scans to visit websites, Michael Horn on reinventing schools, and more...
UPDATE (see end of post): Perhaps this is just an example of the "chilling effect," where a law deters even behavior that it may not actually cover (perhaps in part because of how the law's own backers had initially described it).
Third post in the symposium on the National Constitution Center "Restoring the Guardrails of Democracy" project. Walter Olson presents the Team Libertarian Report.
Canadian legal scholar Leonid Sirota outlines some reasons why.
Plus: "Reparations" for the news industry, the disappearance of starter homes, and more...
From cronyist subsidies to an unfair tax code, there are several key fixes Congress could make to better serve the public.
The president claims broad authority to act under a post-9/11 law.
Plus: Spider study sheds light on how misinformation spreads, Airbnb regulation ruled unconstitutional, and more...
The likelihood that the Supreme Court considers the FDA's treatment of vaping products is increasing.
The former TV doctor, who two years ago said "we ought to completely change our policy on marijuana," mocks his opponent for agreeing.
The police admitted wrongdoing, but Denver moved forward with a plan to reduce crowds and crimes downtown—by targeting food trucks that did nothing wrong.
An unusually detailed discussion of what factors court should consider in deciding whether a religious exemption request is sincere (generally a threshold requirement for the request to stand any chance of prevailing).
After redistricting, neither representative was willing to run in a different district, leading to a lengthy, expensive, and unnecessary campaign.
Despite an overwhelming sense that the country is headed in the wrong direction, the only way most voters will fire an incumbent is by voting for a different incumbent instead.
Plus: Trump sues over Mar-a-Lago raid, why people vote to "dismantle democracy," how Ireland ruined its rental market, and more...
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said that Russians should "live in their own world until they change their philosophy." But keeping Russians isolated plays into Putin's hands.
Ignoring the principles of supply and demand, Fetterman thinks high gas prices should be a matter for law enforcement.
How do you justify government speech mandates? Apparently, you deliberately pretend that businesses have no right to control the messages they choose to present.
Dennis Misigoy is unsparing in his criticism of both Rubio and likely Democratic nominee Val Demings.
Originalist legal scholars Mike Ramsey and Mike Rappaport debate whether the major questions doctrine - an important theory underlying several recent Supreme Court decisions - can be squared with originalism or not.
"Most" new IRS hires, claims a gullible FactCheck.org, "will provide customer services."
Gun control advocates may embrace the 10th Amendment.
Why should we believe that this boondoggle will produce better results than hundreds of other corporate welfare programs?
The case shows the power given to judges when parental consent or notification is required for a minor's abortion.
But it will raise taxes and sic thousands of new IRS agents on American households.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10