Trump Says He Downplayed the Coronavirus Threat To Avoid 'Panic.' That Helps Explain His Policy Failures.
In interviews with Bob Woodward, the president said he knew COVID-19 was much more serious than he let on.
In interviews with Bob Woodward, the president said he knew COVID-19 was much more serious than he let on.
Trump's new coronavirus adviser Dr. Scott Atlas says yes.
Public health authorities are cracking down on a holiday activity where the age group least at risk of COVID-19 walks around outside wearing masks.
The industry's fate depends on the whims of an agency charged with deciding what is "appropriate for public health."
Democrats are proposing $3 trillion.
Plus: FDA meddles more in vaping market, GOP lawmakers take aim at social media (again), and more...
A federal lawsuit argues that the distinction drawn by Massachusetts is unconstitutional.
A new lawsuit argues that the city and state's eviction bans are an unconstitutional impairment of contracts unrelated to the COVID-19 pandemic.
School choice programs can help Hispanic families ease their fears about the coronavirus.
New York City restaurants have been excluded from the reopening of dining rooms in the rest of the state.
The Trump administration's new nationwide eviction moratorium provokes a backlash from some congressional Republicans.
It's a power grab that could undermine federalism and separation of powers, and imperil property rights.
If the goal is minimizing the death toll over the long run, it is too soon to say.
"Economists are accustomed to thinking about tradeoffs," says economist and Nobel laureate Alvin Roth. "It appears that at least in some parts of the ethics community, they are not."
The Trump administration is pushing the envelope of its executive authority by issuing a new blanket eviction moratorium for all rental properties nationwide.
Plus: Joseph Kennedy losing in Massachusetts, the White House is preparing an eviction moratorium, and more...
Public officials are routinely undermining the legitimacy of coronavirus countermeasures by ignoring their own (often arbitrary) rules.
67 percent say they would get vaccinated as soon as an inoculation becomes available.
"We are writing to ask you to update your Halloween safety guidance to include considerations related to COVID-19."
The Reason Roundtable spits fire at street violence, poison politics, and the nationalization of every local story.
Abolishing fares could lead to even more federal aid for L.A. Metro, which has already received a $861.9 million bailout this year.
America has been lagging behind other countries.
The risk for the elderly is much higher, probably largely because of preexisting medical conditions.
Defeating surveillance is a powerful argument for covering your face.
"When terror is seen as justified, I think it's inevitable that something terrible is going to happen," journalist Nancy Rommelmann told Nick Gillespie last week.
On missing the accessible fruits of giant corporate filmmaking
The assertion, which contradicts the president's own warnings about the virus, is based on a misinterpretation of CDC data.
The infection and death rates have surpassed those of the general population.
A new study suggests that a second higher wave of infections can be avoided.
Research suggests reducing spending will boost consumption in the short- and long-run.
The president wasn't kidding that he told public health officials, ‘Slow the testing down, please!’
Rose City has been on fire for months. Are Portland-style protests coming soon to a town near you?
Leasing state toll roads could provide the revenue states need to improve their balance sheets.
Even when they have a good idea, the argument gets muddled.
Gerald Friedman of the University of Massachusetts says yes, while the Pacific Research Institute's Sally Pipes says no.
The PPP hasn't worked as planned, and one cheery exception does not disprove the rule.
The Reason Roundtable assesses one convention, previews another, and pleads with everyone to get their kids out of politics.
Two sets of states, the House of Representatives and Solicitor General all get argument time.
The New York Times thinks so, but the data do not fit that hypothesis very well.
The danger of the virus can’t be considered to the exclusion of the need for jobs and prosperity.
Would requiring masks for in-person voting infringe constitutional rights?