How Does California Define COVID-19 'Misinformation'? Judges Disagree, but Doctors Are Expected To Know.
One federal judge thought the state's new restrictions on medical advice were clear, while another saw a hopeless muddle.
One federal judge thought the state's new restrictions on medical advice were clear, while another saw a hopeless muddle.
seems to have gone very well.
They both share in their authoritarian desires to censor online speech and violate citizen privacy.
"There is an obligation both to incarcerated persons and the taxpayers not to keep someone incarcerated for longer than they should be," a Louisiana district attorney said. "Timely release is not only a legal obligation, but arguably of equal importance, a moral obligation."
U.S. District Judge William B. Shubb says the law is unconstitutionally vague.
Bipartisan efforts to ban the app in America would be a great blow to our economy and our liberty.
Why is Gov. Ron DeSantis acting just like his opposition by attempting to dictate what students are permitted to learn?
The president seems to have forgotten his concession that such laws leave murderers with plenty of options that are "just as deadly."
"The Town has routinely detained, cited, and forced Mr. Brunet to go to trial to vindicate his constitutional rights, taking the extraordinary step of adopting a boldly unconstitutional local Ordinance to silence him," the complaint reads.
"I think, in principle, it's ridiculous to have to deal with this eminent domain bullshit on the grounds of the Alamo," says owner Vince Cantu.
Priscilla Villarreal's case will be heard again tomorrow at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. She has attracted some unlikely supporters.
Daryl Morey raises concerns about the lack of free expression at his alma mater.
And we can publish them much more quickly than most major law reviews would.
"Sometimes I even feel like they wanted me in there, because I was in there so long," said one 18-year-old who was wrongfully incarcerated for 166 days.
Western nations should adopt a general policy of granting refuge to Russians seeking to avoid conscription, and otherwise fleeing Vladimir Putin's increasingly repressive regime.
"Respondent voluntarily resigned his position with Petitioner and allegedly embarked on a career as an adult film actor and standup comedian."
The Supreme Court's Dobbs decision gives states the ability to prohibit abortion. For a lot of pro-lifers, this highlights how much persuading they still have to do.
The actor is a polarizing figure. That shouldn't matter when evaluating the criminal case against him.
The researchers identified 662 cases involving threats to multiple victims, but they concede that it's likely "there are many more threats than completed events."
"In short, the controlling motivations for the suspension were the interest in bringing down a reform prosecutor," the judge wrote.
Virginia’s children’s privacy proposal leaves businesses wondering how they can comply.
Thousands of local, state, and federal law-enforcers have access to sensitive financial data.
So the Florida Supreme Court held today.
Justice Department regulations threaten people with prosecution for failing to register even when their state no longer requires it.
Eliminating privacy in schools would be a disaster for academic freedom and social development.
(Note that this case is about immunity when Internet platforms provide access to material, not the separate question about immunity when Internet platforms block access to material.)
"If you don't like a book, don't read it. The First Amendment's guarantee of the freedom of speech and the right to access information has created a beautiful marketplace of ideas in our country," said one ACLU representative opposing the bill.
Body camera footage shows precisely why some people don’t trust police to respond appropriately to nonviolent incidents.
The Supreme Court takes up “true threats” and the First Amendment in Counterman v. Colorado.
The lawyer's "personal interest in avoiding the 'reputational harm' that she might suffer if the public were made aware of the 'very serious allegations here'" "cannot meet the 'weighty' standard for overriding the presumptions of open records and public access."
Plus: FOSTA in court, challenges to Illinois' assault weapon ban, and more...
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. ET for a discussion of the Facebook Files with Robby Soave.
Throughout the pandemic, the CDC was in constant contact with Facebook, vetting what users were allowed to say on the social media site.
Secret internal Facebook emails reveal the feds' campaign to pressure social media companies into banning COVID "misinformation."
The city has not granted a single permit since the Supreme Court upheld the right to bear arms last June.