The U.K. Has Banned 'Harmful Gender Stereotypes' in Advertisements
The move is an assault on free speech.
The move is an assault on free speech.
Don't blame him for any FISA abuses. He's been fighting it for years.
Hawley is selling it as a way to fight tech-company "bias" against Republicans. Don't believe him.
"These type of microaggressions occur too often on campus."
Reason's Robby Soave on his new book, Panic Attack: Young Radicals in the Age of Trump
I shouted out, who killed online freedom of speech? When after all, it was you and me.
It's become nothing but a weapon fought over by people who want to smash each other—and you.
Alice sends nude picture to her ex, Bob. Bob's new girlfriend (or maybe would-be girlfriend) Carol gets it and posts it online. Carol wouldn't be guilty under the state revenge porn statute, the court rules.
The president's spokeswoman is doing what she has always done on TV, unencumbered by the legal distinction between partisan pundit and executive branch employee.
Also: Mike Lee says Congress must reassert power over the presidency. And so long to Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
A lawyer caught on tape criticizing his client (a judge), in the making of a documentary about the prosecution of rapper Meek Mill.
New technologies mean new crimesolving techniques—and new threats to privacy and liberty.
Nancy Pelosi's overwrought take on Donald Trump's receptiveness to "oppo research" is hard to take seriously.
A small city in California has been plagued by police shootings, costly civil rights lawsuits, and incidents of excessive force.
Habitually untrustworthy snoops still demand we trust them to monitor our communications.
The debate about whether the killer should have been prosecuted for federal hate crimes shows how the Justice Department targets defendants based on the opinions they express.
Be afraid as more journalists and politicians start calling for stronger policing of online speech.
Plus: Amash says the "two-party system is hurting America," Zuckerberg gets deepfaked, Wonkette's lame defense of Harris, and more...
State databases that track the medications we take invade our privacy without reducing opioid-related deaths.
Plus: psychedelics research bill moves forward, big companies push back against abortion bans, and more...
Prof. Michael Dorf, who co-signed an amicus brief with me on this subject, adds more in response to an exchange with a law professor on the other side.
The agency is mum on how many people are impacted
Despite scant evidence, everyone wants to believe that social media has a unique ability to control our thoughts and actions.
"The presence of YAF would further marginalize minority students on campus."
When Tucker Carlson and Elizabeth Warren agree on trade, regulation, and social media, it's time to rethink a few things.
We can still say no to mass surveillance.
The U.S. Supreme Court had sent the case back down to be considered in light of the (narrow) Masterpiece Cakeshop decision.
You might consider buying a hat to cover your face—and hoping you’ll be allowed to wear it.
Plus: Ashton Kutcher serves up "sex trafficking"-enabled surveillance, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio goes after soft serve, and more...
The video platform temporarily demonetized a conservative comedian's channel, satisfying no one.
The People v. Lawrence Ferlinghetti explains how America embraced free speech—and how we're ready to throw it away.
The Seattle festival's organizers argue that banning signs referring to state-licensed cannabusinesses violates the state and federal constitutions.
The police conducted two searches in two days to track down who is leaking things leaders don’t want the public to know.
"We must act now" is not a gun control policy, let alone an argument.
Don't worry, a spokesman tells Congress, the agency has "strict policies" for using facial recognition technology.
Censorship inevitably ends up being used to protect the powerful from criticism.
Both still see surveillance abuse that needs fixing. They’re pursuing different paths to get there.
An ACLU brief bolsters the state's case, arguing that people reasonably expect information about the medications they take will be kept confidential.
Restrictionists once again discover that draconian rules aren’t enough to overcome people unwilling to obey.
Plus: Spending bill includes pro-marijuana changes, State Department starts collecting social media accounts of visa applicants, and more...
The President's effort to coerce Mexico into blocking the emigration of its own people undermines the distinction between keeping people out and locking them in. It thereby makes US immigration policy analogous to the Berlin Wall.
A lower court decision the Supreme Court is currently considering reviewing has important - and dangerous - implications for property rights.
Abroad, legislators are in the mood to theatrically punish social media companies. CEOs shouldn’t play along.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10