How Scientific American's Departing Editor Helped Degrade Science
When magazines like Scientific American are run by ideologues producing biased dreck, it only makes it more difficult to defend the institution of science itself.
When magazines like Scientific American are run by ideologues producing biased dreck, it only makes it more difficult to defend the institution of science itself.
Despite his cluelessness, the former president's inclination to punish constitutionally protected speech reflects his authoritarian disregard for civil liberties.
A recent American Cancer Society study reports a negligible risk from passive smoking, shedding new light on the uproar over a 2003 paper.
"I am not in the newsroom," the embattled NPR chieftain said over and over again.
A recent poll finding that 18 percent of all Americans and 32 percent of Republicans believe Taylor Swift is part of a covert conspiracy effort to help Biden win reelection. This is just one example of the broader problem of political ignorance and bias.
Preferential college admissions violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
Plus: The real message behind DeSantis' abortion anecdote, midwives sue over Alabama regulations, and more…
Asked about people in general, respondents perceive moral decline. But when asked about specific acts or people in their personal worlds, the data tell a different story.
Plus: DEI trainings don't work, a case for compensating organ donors, and more...
We asked the hot new artificial intelligence system to take four popular political quizzes. Guess what we found...
Economist Tyler Cowen argues this approach is too often neglected. But is more common than he suggests.
When it comes to political polarization, it's confirmation bias all the way down.
Plus: Virginia's vote for the ERA is too late, South Carolina moves to relax birth control prescription requirements, and more...
Republicans have seized on the dubious claims of a psychologist who thinks Big Tech is shifting millions of votes to the left.
If conservatives don't like The New York Times, they don't have to read it. Unlike in the not-so-distant past, you now have endless media options.
In new studies, many people "reported that morally good beliefs require less evidence to be justified, and that, in some circumstances, a morally good belief can be justified even in the absence of sufficient evidence."
Never mind the court order showing the child as a dependent in her care.
More implicit bias research comes under scrutiny
We need to leave ourselves room for making good when we inevitably convict the wrong people.
A new book offers a tour of the modern study of race and racism.
"These type of microaggressions occur too often on campus."
Niskanen Center President Jerry Taylor argues that we should reject libertarianism and other ideologies in favor of "moderation." But, in truth, we cannot and should not abjure ideology. Trying to do so is likely to increase bias, not curb it.
But if the show must exist, I have some ripped-from-the-headlines ideas for upcoming plots.
Trump used Twitter to blast Twitter for allegedly censoring several prominent conservative leaders.
Devin Nunes gets the Richard Spencer treatment.
Former Biscayne Park Police Chief Raimundo Atesiano is accused of arrested black men for burglaries to boost the department's image.
New study explores liberal bias of university faculty-it's worse than we thought
The New York Times drives John Stossel crazy. He wants to rip it up, because so many stories have a left-wing bias.
How can you re-program the thinking of boorish college students when their free speech guarantees get in the way?
When the press tilts in favor of higher taxes and more regulation, democracy is indeed distorted.
"Hate crimes" suspected to be motivated by racial bias have dropped, but those perceived to be motivated by gender bias nearly doubled.
The Times news columns have been openly campaigning against Trump's tax cuts from the moment they were rolled out.
But wait, where was elite media advice about dealing with news-related anxiety back during the Obama administration?
(You don't really have to shut up, but here's my money.)
Yes, I'll donate to Reason right now! I'll keep my money today, thanksReason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksHelp Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksReason is the antidote to the same old stale take on ideas that actually matter to me.
I’ll support Free Minds and Free Markets! Not interestedReason pushes me to think critically with facts and analysis that shape my perspective and amplify the ideas I care about.
I want to make a donation so that my voice can be heard! Not todayEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedIt’s hard to trust the media these days, especially when everyone is pushing a partisan agenda. Reason stands for my right to make my own choices.
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No, I’ll follow the partisan herdReason’s fearless, principled journalism keeps me sane in a crazy world.
Making a donation to Reason right now will keep me from losing my mind! No, I like being madSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksSupport the voices that advocate for your freedom. Donate to Reason today!
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today