Prosecuting Trump for Incitement Would Set a Dangerous Precedent
Unlike the cancellation of Josh Hawley’s book, such criminal charges pose a real threat to freedom of speech.
Unlike the cancellation of Josh Hawley’s book, such criminal charges pose a real threat to freedom of speech.
The impeachment article against the president cites a little-discussed section of the 14th Amendment.
High government officials don't have a First Amendment right to be protected from firing based on their political views. That applies to presidents facing impeachment no less than other officials.
A response to Joshua Blackman and Seth Tillman
Under federal law, incitement to riot does not include "advocacy of ideas" or "expression of belief" unless it endorses violence, which Trump did not do.
Contrary to what the judge who blocked his extradition implied, the Espionage Act does not include an exception for "responsible" journalism.
The more that big social media companies act like they can control what people say, the more competition they encourage.
"I hope my case can start removing senseless boundaries to teletherapy," said Brokamp, who is suing in federal court on First Amendment grounds.
Police response “likely escalated tensions and the potential for violence” say investigators.
The justices emphasized that K-12 schools are currently scheduled to reopen after winter break.
Now do qualified immunity.
"While I fully support the spirit of this legislation, certain technical changes are necessary."
Though journalists tend to despise the WikiLeaks founder, his fate could impact the future of their profession.
The escaped slave called the Constitution "a glorious liberty document" that justified extending equality to blacks and women.
"I am pessimistic about where this goes in the future," says the outgoing chairman, who is stepping down in January.
Plus: Congress to vote today on marijuana decriminalization, new study shows bad news for indoor diners, and more...
The outgoing FCC chairman discusses 'light-touch' regulation and the future of free speech on the internet.
The New York Times columnist misconstrues the issues at stake in the challenge to New York's restrictions on houses of worship.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo described his policy as a "fear-driven response," cut by a "hatchet" rather than a "scalpel."
Plus: National Labor Relations Board rules against The Federalist, France is getting less free, and more...
A divided panel concludes that such ordinances run afoul of the First Amendment, creating a split with other circuits.
A court split between Florida and California may mean an eventual Supreme Court decision.
ISU initially criticized the tweet, but later affirmed the group's free speech rights and declined to punish them.
The case gives SCOTUS another chance to enforce constitutional limits on disease control measures.
But what one side likes, the other side hates. There's no way Twitter and Facebook can appease them both.
Plus: DOJ argues for right to kill civilians, tech CEOs are back before Congress today, Dolly Parton helped fund COVID-19 vaccine, and more...
When "fundamental rights are restricted" during an emergency, he says, the courts "cannot close their eyes."
A new lawsuit says the state's electioneering statutes violate the First Amendment.
Judge Susan Brnovich said no reasonable person would question her impartiality just because her husband already says they're guilty.
Part three in Reason's documentary series, "Cypherpunks Write Code," tells the story of the U.S. government's long battle to keep strong cryptography out of the hands of its citizens
Democrats and Republicans agree on that point, although they disagree about what it means in practice.
Plus: Supreme Court won't stop Pennsylvania from counting late ballots, proposed amendment would limit Court to nine justices, and more...
A brief supporting the company's appeal argues that its discussion of pain treatment was constitutionally protected.
Ira Glasser, former head of the ACLU, is worried that his former group is embracing identity politics over free speech.
Plus: Pennsylvania restaurant wins lockdown lawsuit, Pakistan bans TikTok, and more...
Plus: 898,000 new jobless claims, and more...
The subject of the new film Mighty Ira explains why social justice warriors are wrong to attack free speech.
The Texas senator notes the opposing party's blind spots on freedom of speech and the right to arms.
Two courts say COVID-19 lockdowns in Michigan and Pennsylvania were unconstitutional.
A new DOJ proposal aims to bring the internet communications law in line with Trump's personal interpretation of it.
The parts that aren't constitutionally dubious are brainless culture-war fodder.
“The Constitution sets certain lines that may not be crossed, even in an emergency.”
There’s nothing good about censoring communication platforms citizens want to use.
The Wall Street Journal reports that Barr told prosecutors to pursue federal charges, including sedition charges, whenever possible.
Plus: America's global prestige continues to drop, marijuana law enforcement is still racist, Wisconsin and Minnesota voters prefer Biden, and more...
That point seems to have escaped many people who have not actually watched the controversial film, some of whom think it should banned.
Population-wide lockdown orders are "such a dramatic inversion of the concept of liberty in a free society as to be nearly presumptively unconstitutional" wrote U.S. District Judge William Stickman IV
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10