'There's Nothing There,' Biden Said the Day Before the FBI Found More Classified Documents in His House
If Trump's handling of government secrets was "totally irresponsible," how should we describe Biden's conduct?
If Trump's handling of government secrets was "totally irresponsible," how should we describe Biden's conduct?
Thousands of local, state, and federal law-enforcers have access to sensitive financial data.
Plus: The editors field a listener question on college admissions and affirmative action.
Part of a law that authorizes warrantless snooping is about to expire, opening up a opportunity to better protect our privacy rights.
Prosecuting Trump for keeping government records at Mar-a-Lago now seems doomed for political as well as legal reasons.
In both cases, proving criminal intent would be a tall order.
The first FBI director wasn't all bad (or a cross-dresser). But he and the agency he created regularly flouted constitutional limits on power.
The first FBI director wasn't a cross-dresser, says a new biography, but he was often quick to flout constitutional limits on state power.
People in power lean on private businesses to impose authoritarian policies forbidden to the government.
Congress' end-of-the-year omnibus bill was delayed by arguments over where to build the new facility.
The latest Twitter Files installment shows the FBI paid Twitter millions of dollars to cover the costs of processing the agency's requests. Yikes.
Maybe the FBI has something better to do with its time?
Plus: The editors briefly celebrate a noteworthy shake-up in the Senate.
Content moderators had "weekly confabs" with law enforcement officials, reports Matt Taibbi.
Photos and information you store on iCloud will be safer from hackers, spies, and the government.
The appeals court says Donald Trump's status as a former president does not entitle him to special treatment.
A precedent set in the January 6 prosecutions could be dangerous to the public.
According to the former president's lawyers, his decision to retain the documents made them "personal."
Plus: Pandemic learning loss, German weed legalization, and more...
The FBI changed the way it compiles data, and reporting law-enforcement agencies have yet to catch up.
Plus: Court says DACA is illegal, Colorado baker appeals gender transition cake ruling, and more...
Even if a warrant wasn’t the DOJ’s only option, its choice to go this route doesn’t signal—let alone prove—anything about the future of the probe.
Judge Gary Klausner admits that the FBI probably hid their true motives in rifling through the contents of hundreds of safe deposit boxes, but says that's fine.
The potential crimes that the FBI is investigating do not hinge on the current classification status of the records that the former president kept at Mar-a-Lago.
Even if Trump did declassify those records, the 11th Circuit says, he "has not identified any reason that he is entitled to them."
In any case, that issue does not seem relevant under the statutes that the FBI cited in its search warrant.
The former president's legal team notably did not endorse his claim that he automatically declassified everything he took with him.
The FBI used a network of snitches to spy on entertainers and activists, and the Queen of Soul was no exception.
"Nuclear weapons issue is a Hoax," says the former president, who insists that nothing at Mar-a-Lago was actually classified.
The FBI's long history of using informants and manufactured plots to prosecute extremists
That failure adds to the evidence that Trump or his representatives obstructed the FBI's investigation.
There are still lingering questions about the former president's criminal liability and the threat posed by the documents he kept.
After an embarrassing failure for the FBI counterterrorism program, federal prosecutors won convictions against two of the men accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.
We still know almost nothing about their contents, which is relevant in assessing the decision to search Mar-a-Lago.
New court documents show that the FBI planned for months to seize and forfeit property found inside safe deposit boxes in an L.A. raid under the pretext of doing an inventory.
Although U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart is inclined to unseal the document, redactions demanded by the Justice Department could make it hard to understand.
But it's hard to believe conservatives who wanted to lock up their political opponents and opposed police-accountability measures are acting out of principle rather than partisanship.
Reinforcing the FBI's suspicions was the whole point of that document, which is likely to remain sealed.
Plus: Book ban enthusiasm ensnares Bible, free speech for nutrition advice, and more...
Whatever threat it may have posed, the trove of government documents seized by the FBI does not reflect well on the former president's judgment.
The law has been abused to prosecute citizens for reasons other than spying. But there are better examples than Trump to highlight problems.
Plus: The editors reaffirm free speech absolutism in the wake of the recent attack on Salman Rushdie.
Tax collectors and federal cops have always been rotten to the core.
The former president thought his 2016 opponent should go to prison for recklessly endangering national security.
After the former president dismissed the allegation as a "hoax," multiple sources now report that investigators found top secret and classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.
Plus: Elon Musk isn't the free speech warrior some think he is, #MeToo may have harmed women's productivity, and more...
As the response to the Mar-a-Lago raid illustrates, Republicans are inconsistent in the other direction.
Garland said the move was in the name of transparency, as part of his pledge that the Justice Department would "speak through its work."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10