The Big National Injunction Case
A decision with major implications for the national injunction--not Trump v. Hawaii but Gill v. Whitford
A decision with major implications for the national injunction--not Trump v. Hawaii but Gill v. Whitford
The government's prosecution of the Silk Road founder depended on a Fourth Amendment doctrine made questionable by Carpenter's new respect for the information accessible via modern technology.
Interview of David Sanger in episode 223 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Cannabidiol, recognized by most states as a treatment for epilepsy, now has the federal government's blessing.
Play On author Jeff Bercovici explains how to get stronger, faster, smarter in middle age and beyond.
A poorly written proposal to expand copyright claims could potentially decimate online sharing of information.
A handful of primary races and runoffs in seven states hold a national significance.
Today's Supreme Court decision adds to the law -- and the uncertainty -- about when the First Amendment bans the government from requiring speech.
The op ed outlines some of the grave flaws in today's Supreme Court ruling.
A disciplinary panel recommended Andrew Medina be fired. He was not.
"It's all working out great," Trump said in South Carolina. Few people seem to agree with that assessment.
An interesting separate concurrence in the "travel ban" decision.
In a civil suit, Paul's attorney claims the senator has been the victim of "physical pain and mental suffering."
A new report finds high costs, and low speeds on Europe's high-speed rail lines.
Some preliminary comments on a badly flawed ruling.
Anti-immigrant fearmongers of demographic doom proved wrong in the 19th and 20th centuries, and today's will be no different.
"The Government has set forth a sufficient national security justification to survive rational basis review."
The U.S. has nearly unlimited power to decide when foreigners are admitted to the country, even based on factors (such as ideology, religion, and likely race and sex) that would be unconstitutional as to people already in the country.
The E.U. retaliated against Trump's steel and aluminum tariffs. Now, whiskey drinkers will pay the price.
Is it really fair for we who benefited from fossil fuels to blame for global warming on those who supplied what we demanded?
In a narrow, 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court overturns lower court injunction against Travel Ban 3.0, while also declaring Korematsu has been overruled.
One government intervention into the economy begets another, and American businesses are caught in the chaos. Good and easy to win? Not so much.
President David Cole says guidelines "are explicitly designed to help affiliates and national staff think through various factors in case selection decisions."
Plus: The FDA approves a cannabidiol-based drug and The Intercept explores the NSA's secret spy hubs.
The SEC is getting serious about initial coin offering (ICO) oversight.
Let's get behind economic freedom for everyone, even when we don't like how they use it.
Will widespread private arms rebalance power between individuals and the state? It looks like we're going to find out.
David Cole and Nadine Strossen had responded to Kaminer's op-ed on this; Kaminer responds in turn.
Democrats in Congress are releasing statements that undercut Rep. Maxine Waters' call to harass members of Trump's administration.
Her money is green, and you can talk to her while she's chowing down.
The media empire's flagship paper has seen subscription rates boom with Trump in office. But can the good times last?
Reason editors grapple with disassociation etiquette, family separation, third-party legal doctrine, health association plans, and the existential despair of Fozzie Bear
The political advantages of the president's zigzagging on family separation and the "Muslim ban" are not obvious.
Washington State told to revisit ruling against Arlene's Flowers.
"If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant...you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them."
It can do that because it's a global brand, but other businesses aren't as lucky. And workers everywhere stand to lose.
Recognition for everything from Florida's terrible drug sentencing laws, to the efforts to legalize ecstasy, to explanations of why Trump's wall won't work.
The Supreme Court justices divide among themselves in many different ways.
Plus: Parsing the Westworld season-two finale and how Trump's tariffs could be bad for good cheese.
It is well-established that everyone within the United States, even those who may have entered illegally or over-stayed a visa, are entitled to Due Process.
In 18th century France, wearing the wrong fabric could get you in big trouble.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.