Sexting

Police Investigate 20 Kids for Sexting, Charge No One (Thankfully)

The ideal outcome

|

Phone
Peter Cripps / Dreamstime

Let's hear it for an unusually sensible police response to a case of high school sexting.

The Nashua, New Hampshire, police received word in May that 10 or 20 students at Bishop Guertin High School had been snapping and swapping sexts.

But then, rather than arresting these kids for making child porn, or threatening to register them as sex offenders, the police did something outrageously reasonable.

They opted not to charge any of them.

As Nashua's Lieutenant Robert Page told WMUR TV:

"To begin with, the laws of child pornography were developed to target and prosecute child predators, not students and juveniles who make bad decisions," Page said.

Police said they have spoken to all the students who were involved and their parents. They also wiped the photos off the phones.

The police went on to tell the students that what they put on social media never completely disappears, so from now on, lay off the inappropriate photos. That's precisely the response I think most of us would want from the cops if our own kids ever sent or received a sext. (Which, if they're under 23, they probably did, by the way.)

Now compare the perspective and compassion of those Nashua, NH, police to the actions in any number of other teen sexting cases. For instance:

  • The 2014 Virginia case where cops sought and obtained a warrant to give a teen boy an erection so they could compare it to a sext they had gotten their hands on (as it were).
  • The case in Minnesota where a 14-year-old girl sent a racy picture of herself to a boy she liked, and was charged with distributing child porn. Yes, that made her both the exploited child and the nefarious pornographer.
  • The Rhode Island case where a girl, 13, sent a boy, 14, "inappropriate" pictures of herself, which the boy inappropriately shared. Lots of inappropriate behavior going on. But how inappropriate? He was charged with distributing child porn, she was charged with disseminating indecent material.

I vote to have Page make a video for the National Association of Police Organizations saying just what he said to WMUR:

"The laws of child pornography were developed to target and prosecute child predators, not students and juveniles who make bad decisions."

Or maybe we should needlepoint some police station pillows with that statement. Or make t-shirts. Or simply repeat it over and over until law enforcement realizes the American public does not want its children being treated like child pornographers simply because they've got a cell phone and some hormones both turned on at the same time.

Advertisement

NEXT: What Happens If Cryptocurrency Technologies Are Regulated as Securities?

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. As Nashua’s Lieutenant Robert Page told WMUR TV

    “…immediately before being placed on unpaid administrative leave,” is the end of that sentence.

  2. I wonder how much the Free State Project has influenced police in that state to where this was their response instead of a crackdown.

    1. New Hampshire has a bunch of lefty stuff going on there based on the news over the past few years but it seems to be magnitudes lower than the surrounding blue states of New England.

  3. Kids were intimidated. Records were seized. Donuts were consumed. Overtime was logged. The thin blue line has been held strong for another day!

  4. Kids don’t need cel phones.

    1. Look we aren’t trying to have cell phone confiscation, just ban dangerous accessories like cameras. We’ll have voluntary buy back program and then if you don’t submit the police will show up with the help of NSA and collect cellphones of those who don’t comply.

  5. Police said they have spoken to all the students who were involved and their parents. They also wiped the photos off the phones.

    That’s not all they had to wipe off of the phones after their “thorough review”.

  6. At least they got to look over the evidence.

  7. “To begin with, the laws of child pornography were developed to target and prosecute child predators, not students and juveniles who make bad decisions,” Page said.

    With all due respect, Lieutenant, how do you know what your legislators intended?

  8. Students learn a valuable lesson. Cops get some valuable, erm, evidence for their database.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.