In Tariffs Dissent, Clarence Thomas Embraced a Dangerous Theory of Executive Power
The conservative justice’s regrettable opinion in Learning Resources v. Trump.
The conservative justice’s regrettable opinion in Learning Resources v. Trump.
The president is relying on a provision that the government's lawyers said had no "obvious application" to his goal of reducing the trade deficit.
Attorneys for the Trump administration even admitted that Section 122 can't be applied to address trade deficits. Trump is now trying to do that anyway.
The president neither understands nor appreciates the vital role of judicial independence in upholding the rule of law.
President Trump will undoubtedly keep trying to impose protectionism, but his options are limited.
The prominent conservative legal commentator outlines the case against Trump's latest tariff power grab.
It covers many issues raised by the decision.
The legislation would almost certainly lead to a higher cost of living in the form of substantial tax increases.
What explains the fracture in the Supreme Court's "conservative bloc"?
Thanks to our victory in the tariff case before the Supreme Court, businesses that paid billions of dollars in illegally collected tariffs can seek refunds. But the process may be difficult.
A federal judge ruled in 2022 that "no legitimate humane system would operate" like Arizona's prison health care system. Three years later, that same judge found the problems still hadn't been fixed.
The new tariff will be implemented under a 1974 law that gives the president authority to impose tariffs for up to 150 days.
The battle against the president's so-called reciprocal tariffs is won, but the war for free trade and a stable business environment continues.
"will appreciate the legislative process for the bulwark of liberty it is."
There are many laws that explicitly authorize the president to impose taxes on imports, but they include limits that Trump was keen to avoid.
"There is no exception to the major questions doctrine for emergency statutes," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts.
In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize tariffs.
The cost of paying the interest is now the central story, and it's a grim one.
So now it’s radical to be against Biden-era merger notification requirements?
An encounter on the campaign trail. Was it a dead end, or a wasted opportunity?
Is the conservative Supreme Court justice planning to retire this year?
Finally given a chance to influence trade policy, the vast majority of House Republicans decided it was more important to keep President Donald Trump happy.
Gail Slater resigned from her position as Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department's Antitrust Division after butting heads with Attorney General Pam Bondi over merger enforcement.
Federal law bans the creation of a gun registry, but regulators made one anyway.
The Break Up Big Medicine Act makes no mention of the laws and government programs responsible for consolidation of the health care industry.
The Biden administration said the $350 billion bailout was urgent and necessary. Five years later, that doesn't seem true.
The Department of Homeland Security argues it doesn't need a warrant to enter a construction site.
Plus: the attorney general's self-inflicted wounds, religious revivals, and Congress votes to stop Trump's tariffs on Canada
Inflation is a silent tax—and the most painful way to finance government promises.
It was notable that the GOP members and witnesses made little effort to actually defend the legislation in question.
But the numbers are a long way from a veto-proof majority, so Wednesday's vote may be a purely symbolic victory for free traders.
Government agencies rarely check whether their handouts go to the right people. Why?
The story is an exercise in pettiness but also a perfect reason why Congress and the Supreme Court should limit the president's power grab.
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
Three Republicans defected to vote down an arcane procedural rule that would have made it impossible for the House to vote on Trump’s tariffs until August.
Politicians like New York’s Mayor Mamdani promise to solve a problem that they created.
The newspaper’s plan to address marijuana abuse would compound the disadvantages that state-licensed suppliers face in competing with the black market.
Rep. Thomas Massie said the men were "likely incriminated."
Plus: The House passes housing reform, Florida advances ADUs, and Zohran Mamdani hosts show trials for bad landlords.
Plus: An immigration court drops Rumeysa Ozturk's deportation case, Buddhist monks complete their "walk for peace," previously classified Nixon grand jury testimony is released, and more...
Plus: Speaker of the House Mike Johnson embraces warrantless ICE searches, the Super Bowl halftime culture war, and Trump continues funding the Department of Education
I will be testifying against this proposed legislation - which would authorize exclusion or deportation of all or most non-citizen Muslim immigrants.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.