Biden Issues At Least 15 Executive Orders and Actions on Day One
Plus: Columbia University neuroscientist defends heroin use, Cuomo plan would still criminalize growing or delivering marijuana, and more...
Plus: Columbia University neuroscientist defends heroin use, Cuomo plan would still criminalize growing or delivering marijuana, and more...
Justice Barrett should revisit her views on this wrongly maligned case.
Biden's willingness to extend a nationwide eviction moratorium, while declining to mandate masks nationwide, demonstrates a worrying inconsistency in his views on presidential powers.
Biden correctly recognizes he doesn't have the authority to impose a general national mask mandate. The same reasoning shows the nationwide eviction ban is also illegal.
The cult of the imperial U.S. presidency has come to feel like a national religion.
Their letter to Congress warns about inevitable abuses against religious and racial minorities.
The Senate minority leader sees a grave political risk in failing to repudiate the former president.
Plus: Pelosi wants 9/11-style commission to investigate Capitol attack, MyPillow drama, and more...
The First Amendment should not be a viable defense in an impeachment trial
The president's final batch of clemency actions includes commutations for dozens of nonviolent drug offenders.
The president acknowledges that there are limits to executive power, even during a public health emergency.
A further rejoinder to Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman.
The Constitution's words, history, and structure suggest the best answer is no. He can't plead, "I beg my pardon."
The House and Senate are making unforced errors in laying the groundwork for an impeachment trial
Eviction bans were enacted as an emergency public health measure. They’re quickly becoming a permanent policy.
Judge Michael Luttig thinks a former president cannot be tried in the Senate. The argument is flawed.
Amazon denies any impropriety in its decision to suspend the Twitter alternative, dismissing the suit as "meritless."
Trump has been impeached, but there is still time to put a stronger case before the Senate.
Conflicting signals from the Belknap impeachment
A rejoinder to Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman.
Neither major party is a friend to limited government.
Something like Wednesday evening's soothing remarks could have made a real difference on the day of the Capitol riot.
Several House Republicans joined their colleagues across the aisle in the ultimate condemnation of Trump's role on Jan. 6.
Impeachment can only succeed if it has substantial bipartisan support. Here are some ways to help make that happen.
Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo seems unlikely to double down on the past four years of economic foolishness at the Commerce Department.
Here is how Mitch McConnell, Mike Pence, Liz Cheney, Ted Cruz, and Josh Hawley responded to the president's election delusions.
History and precedent both support impeachment trials for former federal officials.
The Senate should bifurcate its impeachment inquiry: Remove from office now, Disqualify from Office-holding later
As Mitch McConnell and Liz Cheney break for impeachment, the freshman GOP congressman who succeeded Justin Amash says that Republicans who are "going to vote our conscience tomorrow" expect to be assaulted.
Among many other things, it cites recent writings by VC bloggers Jonathan Adler, Keith Whittington and myself.
GOP leaders who raise this objection to impeachment can help solve the problem through the simple expedient of supporting impeachment themselves.
The impeachment article against the president cites a little-discussed section of the 14th Amendment.
The precedents are clear, and Senate could bar Trump from holding future office.
Justice Clint Bolick dissents in Arizona v. Mixton.
Bureaucracy keeps on regulating through the chaos
Impeachment, 25th Amendment, or censure? Deplatforming, Section 230, or inclusion? The Reason Roundtable debates.
"The question of whether incitement to riot is an impeachable offense is pretty easy," says the Cato Institute's Gene Healy. "Clearly, yes."
The Constitution does not bar such proceedings. And the impeachment process could still serve the valuable purposes of deterring wrongdoing by future presidents and barring Trump from ever holding federal office again.
Prominent legal scholars who rarely agree on anything else make the case for a swift impeachment process.
The last time the Senate split 50-50, the even balance did not last long.
High government officials don't have a First Amendment right to be protected from firing based on their political views. That applies to presidents facing impeachment no less than other officials.
A response to Joshua Blackman and Seth Tillman
The rookie GOP congressman describes Capitol Hill chaos, says that some Republicans who knew better voted against election certification out of physical fear, and explains how serving in Iraq and Afghanistan made him want to "end the endless wars."
Vice President Kamala Harris will be able to case the tie-breaking vote, but 50+1/50 is still not 51/49.
The senator is a performer and nothing more.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks