You may have seen stories about the operation of Facebook's new and innovative "Supreme Court." Don't believe 'em.
Why Republican Senators can vote on the merits of Trump's impeachment even if they believe the Seante has no power to impeach ex-officers.
The Senate should bifurcate its impeachment inquiry: Remove from office now, Disqualify from Office-holding later
January 6 was a very, very bad day for Donald Trump (but not necessarily for the rest of the country)
A surprising number of people seem to believe that the "improbability" that Biden could have won (in a fair election) is evidence that he didn't win (in a fair election). It isn't.
Yes, the nonsense in Texas AG Paxton's lawsuit is as bad as it first appeared
The Texas AG's outlandish claims about the statistical unlikelihood of Biden's victory
Nebraska (!) may well turn out to have provided the critical vote for a Biden victory
A few personal reminiscences on the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Those of you who dislike the Electoral College should find this idea of interest
An 8th Circuit panel makes a hash out of the interpretation of the fractured opinions in SCOTUS' recent June Medical decision
The answer may surprise you.
The Court could have, and probably should have, pushed these cases over to the 2020-21 Term
Putting people who dislike and distrust the government in charge of the government is a risky business, and we are paying the price for it now.
It is unconstitutional, the 11th Circuit holds, for Florida to deny voting rights to ex-felons solely because they have outstanding fines or fees. to vote And yes, "re-disenfranchise" is a real word.
It is the crowning achievement of Professor Dershowitz' long career. Not in a good way.
The Supreme Court now has before it a case in which some very important copyright principles are at stake.
The Supreme Court agrees to hear two cases on the scope of presidential elector discretion
Will we get to hear from the people in Trump's inner circle who might actually know whether he did or did not engage in impeachable misconduct?
Count Two's charges against the President are both more serious in their long-term implications for the constitutional separation of powers, and less defensible on Trump's part, than Count One's.
John Bolton may have critical evidence relevant to the House impeachment inquiry; why hasn't the House subpoenaed his testimony?
No, President Trump cannot invoke his Sixth Amendment rights in connection with House impeachment proceedings
A recently-filed cert petition gives the Court a good opportunity to rule on the constitutional role of presidential electors
An amicus filing in the case challenging the Emergency Declaration's diversion of funds towards building the Wall
Can a State Investigate Alleged Criminal Wrongdoing Involving a Sitting President?
Why are so many people in Washington DC walking around wearing Walgreens gear all of a sudden?
What if we actually took what Trump said seriously? As though he were, say, the President of the United States?
Led Zeppelin may have borrowed from the band "Spirit" in creating the well-known intro to their classic hit, but did they infringe anyone's copyright in doing so?
Some Thoughts on How the President's Stalwart Defenders Will Excuse This Latest Episode
Where are the Republicans - the honest and patriotic ones - who will help lead us out of this calamitous mess?
The highest court in Maryland finds that the State's statute prohibiting "child pornography" applies to minors who sext videos of their own sexual activity to friends.
Are we ready for a return to the "original meaning" of the Electoral College?
Can the "the" - not to be confused with the band "The The" - be protected by trademark?
Liability safe harbors for Internet intermediaries are not responsible for Internet "hate speech"
The DOJ's attempt to introduce an entirely new team of lawyers to work on the citizenship question case is rejected - correctly - by the SDNY.
A wonderful bio of perhaps the most influential American whose name most people don't know
What happened to Congress?
How could Barr have allowed Deputy AG Rosenstein to participate in evaluating an obstruction-of-justice case against the President when Rosenstein was a key participant in the possibly obstructive events, and would be a witness if a charge were brought?
Further explication of our ongoing disagreement concerning the scope and conduct of the Mueller investigation.
Q: Can the federal government hold people in custody indefinitely when they have not been charged with, or convicted of, any crime?
Judge Tigar's (ND CA) asylum decision is an especially inappropriate target for Trump's ranting, given the weakness of the Administration's position on the legal issues raised by the case.